390 swap into a maverick

Discussion in 'Technical' started by ardrossankid, Dec 19, 2014.

?

what is needed to put a 390 in a maverick

  1. 390

    1 vote(s)
    25.0%
  2. mustang 2

    3 vote(s)
    75.0%
  1. lm14

    lm14 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2013
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Location:
    Iowa
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick, 1937 Ford Tudor, 1962 F100
    It can be done and there are some on this site with FE engines in Mavericks. I know of a SOHC and Tunnel Port in Mavericks. Lots of work to make it fit.

    FE can be a really hard running engine. Got one in my '62 unibody with '63 dual quad intake, '61 HiPo heads and a 428 crank in a 390 block.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. John Holden

    John Holden Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    NJ
    Straight axle?
     
  3. John Holden

    John Holden Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    NJ
    I mean for the OP...
     
  4. Bill Arps

    Bill Arps Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2014
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    12
    Location:
    176 Laird Ave Essex Ontario Canada
    Vehicle:
    71 Maverick drag car
    I made my name racing FEs WON stock points with a 428 SCJ 69 Cougar and won allot of class wins and eliminators with my 68 Fair lane and like other posters told you they are a pain to put in for a limited performance gain. Ray Paquet holds SS/A record 427 stick 64 thunderbolt 8-50 ET @ 155 MPH .That shows they can run ,but when you hit a bump and you see the fenders flex you will be sorry.My friends brother did it and i junked his car . So nothing impossible just sum things not worth the effort .
     

    Attached Files:

    Krazy Comet likes this.
  5. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    But you can't buy two 428's for what a 363 stroker will cost.
     
  6. dan gregory

    dan gregory Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    835
    Likes Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    chesapeake va
    Vehicle:
    1970 maverick
    You can get a rotating kit to turn a 390 into a 428 which would be quite potent.But,by the time you notch the towers & put a cage in the car to handle the weight,not including a heavy *** c6,tooooo much weight on the nose.Not practical for the street car when you can build small blks. now that will do the same thing.
     
  7. stroker mav

    stroker mav Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2012
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    canton, ohio
    Vehicle:
    1964 country sedan,1933 essex terraplane
    You can build a 347 11 to 1 compression from a stock roller block,and a hyd roller cam that makes 460 HP very easy,with procomp 210 heads.
     
  8. junrai

    junrai Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,516
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    rancho cordova ca
    Vehicle:
    1972 mercury comet 1972 comet gt
    Ive spent $13100 so far on my 363 and have probably $1500 to go for everything from dart black to turn key
    but itll be producing somewhere in the 1000 hp to the wheels and thats a conservative build for whats possible with the dart small block
    the power to weight ratio of a small block compared to the big blocks and the lack of fabbing anything to make it fit is what made me go with the small block instead of a big ol 460 or even a 390 like I had thoughts of doing before I wen the 363 route

    at first I wanted to do the 390 just to be different but I didnt want to cut and fab stuff to make it fit when I could drop basicaly the same motor the car came with back in

    I still say go for it.
     
  9. stroker mav

    stroker mav Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2012
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    canton, ohio
    Vehicle:
    1964 country sedan,1933 essex terraplane
    What kind of a power adder are you putting on the engine to get 1000 HP ?
     
  10. junrai

    junrai Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,516
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    rancho cordova ca
    Vehicle:
    1972 mercury comet 1972 comet gt
    super charged
     
  11. 74mavCoryE.

    74mavCoryE. Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    13
    Location:
    Alberta Canada
    Vehicle:
    1974 maverick 2 door 302V8 C4 Auto
    390 definitely not gutless definitely not a boat anchor but also definitely not meant for a maverick. But I pity the people that call them boat anchors. A 390 with a stock large cfm 2 bbl carb headers and a mild cam will out rip a 460 any day and most certainly stomp any 302. But too heavy and big to fit in a maverick.
     
  12. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    Didnt they put tbe 390 in mustangs and cougars at one point?
    Weight of a 390 is like 650lbs..with al intake prob closer to 600
     
  13. 74mavCoryE.

    74mavCoryE. Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    13
    Location:
    Alberta Canada
    Vehicle:
    1974 maverick 2 door 302V8 C4 Auto
    They definitely did I believe the mustangs and cougars of the 60's were about 4-6" wider across the shock towers. Also a full dressed 390 or any FE would be 770lbs cam drop 60 lbs or so by using aluminium intake etc. My 3 cents
     
  14. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,689
    Likes Received:
    2,412
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    Alu intake is worth approx 55Lb savings, probably another 50Lb saved using alu heads... With alu heads, intake, and tube headers they won't weigh but very little more than a all iron 351...

    The 390 were used in Stangs from '67 thru '69, and 428 from '68-'70(both FE, same externally)...

    The FE won't begin to fit because Maverick/Comet uses the fat Fairlane/Torino shock towers vs narrower Mustang type... Even with Stang towers would be close, as frame rails are approx ¾" narrower than a '68 Stang(yes I've measured)... Frame rails on '68 Torino are close to three inches wider than Stang...
     
  15. 74mavCoryE.

    74mavCoryE. Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    13
    Location:
    Alberta Canada
    Vehicle:
    1974 maverick 2 door 302V8 C4 Auto
    I completely agree FE motor has no place in a maverick or comet. As long as people stop calling them heavy boat anchors and useless etc. Have built many FE's and never had one come apart even at 700 rpm.
     

Share This Page