c4 with overdrive??

Discussion in 'Transmissions' started by satchelmcqueen, Jul 19, 2015.

  1. satchelmcqueen

    satchelmcqueen Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Location:
    north georgia
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    so im trying to decide to either go with the regular c4 for a 302 swap and regear to 3.00, or go with an overdrive trans. what options are out there for a simple install, but as good as the c4?

    im trying to hit 2000rpms at 70mph. current gear is 3.55

    also someone mentioned the c4 for the 200 6cyl i currently have is different than that of the 302 version of the c4. whats the difference?
     
  2. rthomas771

    rthomas771 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,046
    Likes Received:
    936
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    GA
    Vehicle:
    '74 Maverick 302 5-Speed.'60 Falcon V8. '63.5 Falcon HT
    Gear Vendor https://www.gearvendors.com/hrford3s.html
    If you turn too low of rpm you're running off the idle circuit which runs richer and mpg falls on its face. Most 302's get better mileage at 3000-3300 rpm
     
  3. satchelmcqueen

    satchelmcqueen Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Location:
    north georgia
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    wouldnt that high of rpm (3k) kill a 302 after a few years? maybe im just to cautious, but ive always stayed out of anything over 3000rpms for any length of time.

    if this is ok to run all the time then my 3.55 will be what i stay with. lord knows id love the sound of headers and open dual exhaust at that rpm, but i dont want to hurt the engine in the long run. your opinion please.
     
  4. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,689
    Likes Received:
    2,412
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    It's a case that you'll need small duration cam(stockish) to maintain a good vacuum so you can run efficiently around 2000 RPM... Too much cam and it'll be running with power valve open due to low vacuum...

    The first 5.0 Mustangs with T5 five were carbed... Those used a 3.08 gear along with the .68 O/D for a 2.09 final ratio and gave in the lower 20s for MPG... With 225/60/15 tires that combo ran somewhere around 1800 RPMs at 60 mph...

    Soooo with a non lock torque converter you'd need approx a 2.30 - 2.50 final to run 2000 RPM at 60 MPH... With a AOD, your 3.55s would be equal to a 2.41... Since AOD is lockup, something like 3.80 would probably be a better choice...

    BTW not same but way back I had a '76 Mustang II 4cyl MPG model that came factory with a 8" 2.69 gear... Couldn't get it into 4th till around 35 MPH(had no O/D), but would make 32 MPG highway running 60 MPH(this was back when 55 was national speed limit) ... In that light should be a piece of cake for a 5.0 to pull a similar gear...
     
  5. rthomas771

    rthomas771 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,046
    Likes Received:
    936
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    GA
    Vehicle:
    '74 Maverick 302 5-Speed.'60 Falcon V8. '63.5 Falcon HT
    3k ain't high in my book with a V8...2500 with a six. A 3.55 is great around town red light to red light and maybe going to the next exit on the interstate. If you're talking a lot of interstate driving at 70+ mph then a 3.25 or 3.00 will be better. With a V8 I think you will be happy with 3.55 with an AOD. A 3.55 is a lot of gear at 70 mph without overdrive. I have a 250 six cyl w/t5 and 3.40 gear and it will be screaming its guts out in 4th gear (1 to 1 ratio) at 70+ mph on the interstate but it can hang all day around 50-55 mph.
     
  6. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    523
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
    You want screaming on the interstate you should have been with me on a Portland trip. Drove down 3 or more hours in my GTO with 4.10s at 65-70, squeaked out 5 mpg!

    Edit....TH400, no OD.
     
    rthomas771 likes this.
  7. rthomas771

    rthomas771 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,046
    Likes Received:
    936
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    GA
    Vehicle:
    '74 Maverick 302 5-Speed.'60 Falcon V8. '63.5 Falcon HT
    I know the feeling. Use to have 4.57 with 24" tires on my Falcon. Didn't use 1st or 2nd gear much. Could wind out the 1st 3 gears crossing a 4-lane intersection from a dead stop
     
  8. Hotrock

    Hotrock Rick, an MCCI Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,470
    Likes Received:
    716
    Trophy Points:
    313
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Munroe Falls, Ohio
    Vehicle:
    1972 Mercury Comet, 1997 Mustang Cobra, 2019 Ford Edge ST
    I currently run my 302 with a 3.80 gear and C4 trans. By calculation at 3000 rpm and my 28" tires I cruise at 66 mph. I've been operating with this setup for a number of years with both a 351 and a 302. The short stroke 302 handles it better than the long stroke 351. A 26" tire will give me 61.45 mph @ 3000 rpm.

    My Comet came stock with a 2.79 gear. It was like over-drive on the highway. I would go through the 1/4 mile traps at 96+mph in second gear!

    BTW I will be driving my Comet 3 hours to Washington, PA for the National meet.
     
  9. Mavit

    Mavit Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Prince george bc
    Vehicle:
    two muatangs ansd one comet

    One thing that I found with a 302 is to get the best mileage on the high way it likes 2200 rpm, any lower and there is no throttle response! Run higher and the gas mileage suffers. Some type of over drive is a nice fit
    I use a T-5 with 2.95 low and 3.89 gears! With the over drive my final ratio is higher than it was with the stock
    2.78 gears and the direct C4
     
  10. satchelmcqueen

    satchelmcqueen Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Location:
    north georgia
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    i also had a mustang II 1976.
     
  11. junrai

    junrai Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,516
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    rancho cordova ca
    Vehicle:
    1972 mercury comet 1972 comet gt
    in my comet gt I have a 302 c4 with a 3.55 posi and the gas mileage SUCKS I love the sound of the headers with the dual exhaust on the freeway or around town BUT your wallet and your cooling system better be ready
    I really like the 3.55 but I think its a bit much if you plan to use it for alot of freeway traveling and want to get decent mpg

    my sons 71 maverick grabber with a 84 5.0 stockish build stock cam quick fuel carb electric fuel pump with regulator and not running the vacuum advance hes knocking on 30mpg with a factory 3.00 rear end and a t5 trans. it has tons of power on the street and plenty of mpgs for the freeway oh and he has hooker headers with pypes mufflers just turning out the side off the headers
     
  12. Mavit

    Mavit Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Prince george bc
    Vehicle:
    two muatangs ansd one comet

    Yes a 3.55 gear with a C-4 will spin the engine a little higher at free way speed than is good for fuel economy, what would be a nice setup would be the 3.55 with over drive!
     
  13. satchelmcqueen

    satchelmcqueen Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Location:
    north georgia
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    after much consideration between a rebuilt stock c4 vs ford aod, i am going to just go stock c4 with gear vendors overdrive. itll be a bit more money but you just cant beat the stuff itll do vs an aod. i just dont see how it can be beat. the gear combos are unlimited and you can still gear very stout and keep all the bottom end you want and still come out with a nice cruise gear at the end. this is what ill do.
     
    rthomas771 likes this.
  14. COMETIZED

    COMETIZED Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    542
    Trophy Points:
    288
    Location:
    Florida
    Vehicle:
    70 Mav. 74 Comet
    I ran 3.73 9"inch EqaLok with a Tremec 5 Speed OD tranny in my 75 Comet witha 347 Stroker,Headers,Flowmasters
    Mandrel Bends Exhaust and got excellent on the road mileage and Kicked Booty too on the low end.
    I'm sold on OD Trannys . Both cars have them now .
    Cometized
    (Chip)
     
  15. satchelmcqueen

    satchelmcqueen Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Location:
    north georgia
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    yes, i will use a v8 c4 for the rebuild. now a 250 also is the same as the v8 trans correct?
     

Share This Page