What is the best way to maintain upper A-arms?

Discussion in 'Technical' started by ratio411, Oct 27, 2007.

?

Best way to access grease fittings in the upper A-arms?

  1. Cut nice [i]round[/i] holes and seal them with grommets, only to be removed for service.

    39.1%
  2. Use 90* grease zerks, even though the wheels may have to be removed to service, it's worth it.

    56.5%
  3. Hack the holes, because greasing the arms is better than worrying about some little holes.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Grease fittings!?! What grease fittings?!?

    4.3%
  1. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    Okay, so Craig made a thread that got me thinking... :idea:

    Now that our cars are achieving 'classic' status, how do we properly grease the upper A-arms without hacking dripping steel gouges into our shock towers?
    What should be considered the benchmark way of maintaining the upper A-arms?
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2007
  2. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    I just thought of an option I have seen done...
    However it is sorta obscure and everyone might not be familiar.

    I have seen grease hoses run down to where the fittings would be and then plumbed to the top of the tower and a single grease fitting to feed both sides of each arm.

    That is probably my choice, but I didn't put it in the poll!:banghead:
     
  3. don graham

    don graham MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,800
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    302
    Location:
    arizona city, az.
    Vehicle:
    70 mav, 71 grabber, 73 Comet, 2004 f-250 crew cab diesel, 2001 f-250, 2004 explorer, 2007 Gold Wing trike.
    i was going to be a smart a$$ and say exercise daily. but really the holes with the grommets are about the neatest way to go. i've used the 90 degree fittings before.:)
     
  4. stangclone

    stangclone Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    ofallon,il
    Vehicle:
    1972 maverick,1965 mustang
    i have used the 90* fittings and the wheels do not have to be removed if you use a rubber hose on your greese gun.
     
  5. Rick Book

    Rick Book Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,744
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    197
    Location:
    Thailand
    Vehicle:
    Missing my old '70 Maverick
    I dunno. The grease is going to take the path of least resistance. If there's much resistance in the opposite side line or joint, it will not see any grease.

    Correct? :hmmm:
     
  6. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    Very good point!
    I guess the best way would be to run each hose to it's own zerk.
     
  7. Thack

    Thack vision advicator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Moreno Valley Ca
    Vehicle:
    71 2 Dr Maverick, 70 Mustang Sportsroof, 77 F100 4x4, 72 maverick grabber wifes
    replace with late model mavericks or granadas. they have rubber bushings
     
  8. rayzorsharp

    rayzorsharp I "AM" a Maverick!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    11,256
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    298
    Location:
    Grand Bay, Alabama
    Vehicle:
    Three 71 Maverick Grabbers, a 72 302 Sprint, a 73 LDO 2door parts car, a 76 silver v8 Stallion.
    Tom, are you talking about the entire control arm or just the bushings? I wasn't aware the late model Maverick ones were different.
     
  9. CometGT1974

    CometGT1974 Gearhead

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,583
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    117
    Location:
    Western NC
    Vehicle:
    74 Comet GT
    Throw them in the trash and install a coil-over conversion kit!!:D:dancing:
     
  10. Grabber5.0

    Grabber5.0 Gear-head wannabe

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    127
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    Vehicle:
    71 Grabber
    Not mine. :huh:
     
  11. blugene

    blugene Senior member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,764
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    283
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Marietta, OK
    Vehicle:
    73 Comet GT, 72 Comet GT, 2008 "Comet" (our boxer, who is now in the galaxies)
    I would say holes no bigger than required and properly aligned. I agree that the resistance is a factor, so I think that maybe lifting the car so that the wheels are half way thru its travel points may help ...
     
  12. Grabber5.0

    Grabber5.0 Gear-head wannabe

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    127
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    Vehicle:
    71 Grabber
    I can't believe there is even a poll, after so much talk about how much cutting holes in the towers weakens them. Guess everyone changed their minds? ;)
     
  13. blugene

    blugene Senior member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,764
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    283
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Marietta, OK
    Vehicle:
    73 Comet GT, 72 Comet GT, 2008 "Comet" (our boxer, who is now in the galaxies)
    I certanly understand what your saying. That's why I said no bigger than needed and a straight shot. If the person is going to hack it then better to use the zerks.
    Other things should be considered also, like going with a big block or shaving etc... I wouldn't think having a 6 is a big factor in weakening is what i'm trying to say.
    Also, the hole should be perfectly round, no straight edges/cuts. Due to the difficulty in acheiving this, maybe the zerks would be better. :outtahere:
     
  14. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,822
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    That's why they make hole saws. Unfortunately the person who put the lube holes in mine used a chisel and hammer! :eek: Someday I will weld an appropriately sized washer over each hole and make them more presentable.
     
  15. rayzorsharp

    rayzorsharp I "AM" a Maverick!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    11,256
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    298
    Location:
    Grand Bay, Alabama
    Vehicle:
    Three 71 Maverick Grabbers, a 72 302 Sprint, a 73 LDO 2door parts car, a 76 silver v8 Stallion.
    Exactly...3/4 saw worked great for me.
     

Share This Page