Sacriledge!

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by |MaverickMat|, Nov 6, 2008.

  1. |MaverickMat|

    |MaverickMat| '74 Grabber

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Vehicle:
    1974 Grabber
    Ok I'm bored and I have an idea that is probably not popular :naughty: :naughty:

    I want a lightweight, inexpensive, powerful engine to put in a Maverick. Mavericks already being lightweight, of course. I thought about doing an aftermarket 347 and tricking it out to the max, but that cost $$$ + my firstborn child. So I thought... my buddy has an LS2 in his Camaro... and is always bragging about it... :idea: why can't I put an LS2 in a Mav? They're way cheaper, very lightweight, and with only a cam change and headers I've heard they can push out over 400hp. Would this be a terrible thing to do? Would I be hated for defiling a Ford product with a Chevy engine? I feel like it's in the true spirit of Hot Rodding though...
     
  2. Dave B

    Dave B I like Mavericks!

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    16,931
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Location:
    Parts Unknown......
    Vehicle:
    3 Grabbers
    Do it!!, Be a "Maverick!!"
     
  3. rayzorsharp

    rayzorsharp I "AM" a Maverick!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    11,256
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    298
    Location:
    Grand Bay, Alabama
    Vehicle:
    Three 71 Maverick Grabbers, a 72 302 Sprint, a 73 LDO 2door parts car, a 76 silver v8 Stallion.
    Whether you realize it or not, it would cost you more to do that than it would to put a 347 in.
     
  4. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    i dont see where your getting the idea that it would be anywhere close to "cheaper"...

    and a 347 should be right at 400hp anyway
     
  5. jbbossmav

    jbbossmav Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    md.
    Vehicle:
    71 maverick grabber
    i dont like it..... but maybe thats just me!
     
  6. rthomas771

    rthomas771 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,064
    Likes Received:
    959
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    GA
    Vehicle:
    '74 Maverick 302 5-Speed.'60 Falcon V8. '63.5 Falcon HT
    Yes, you would be hated and people will talk about you behind your back. Everywhere you go people will be pointing their finger at you. If you want a chevy motor go buy a Chevrolet. If you want a Mopar engine buy a Mopar. Keep them in the family :Handshake
     
  7. Bryant

    Bryant forgot more than learned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,538
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    71 Maverick
    its different but i doubt by the time you turn the key and it fires off you will have spent less that you would have on a good 347. not only do you have to customer fit the ls2, wire the eletronics, plum the fuel system, and figure out exhast manifolds or headers, but also figure out what trans to use. you can use adapters to run a ford trans or you can run a gm trans.
    Ive never been a fan of swaping other brand motors in to different make cars. it feel if you want a chevy, get a chevy.
     
  8. Andysutt

    Andysutt '72 Comet GT

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Conway Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT
    I think a 347 would be way cheaper
    You can get a good kit for around a grand

    and it drops right in... worst case scenario is cutting the towers for header and spark plug clearance.
     
  9. ModMav71

    ModMav71 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    773
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    65
    Location:
    Sebring, FL
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber 98 DOHC Cobra engine w/5speed, 1974 Pinto 2.0 4speed daily driver.
    An LS2 should be right at 400hp stock. In the 05-06 GTO's they were rated at 400hp from the factory, actually most make more than that. If I had an LS2 with a 6speed I would drop that in my Maverick in a heart beat. Those are awesome engines! I wouldnt care if everyone else didnt like it, its my car and I will do what makes me happy!
     
  10. |MaverickMat|

    |MaverickMat| '74 Grabber

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Vehicle:
    1974 Grabber
    You guys are gonna flame me, huh.... :hide: Ok, so a crate 347 from Summit, ready to rock out of the box is around 10k (advertised around 400hp, FW I assume). An LS2, we'll go with a crate to be comparible, is about 6k, rated at the same hp. The stroked 302 is basically at it's limit, unless you stoke up the NOS. The LS2 is barely scratching the surface, and you've got about the same weight, almost half the cost, and room for lots more hp if you want it. I'd go with a T-5 tranny, and a chevy tranny would fit in fine and be about the same cost as a Ford. There's the custom driveshaft, with a ford end and chevy end, but I dont' think that'd be too much more than a regular high end driveshaft. The rest is just custom fabrication which just takes time. I'm more worried about the motor mounts... that would be difficult to figure out I think. And yeah the wiring would be a pain... But I feel like you'd have so much more available power to you at a very light weight and, and the VERY least, the cost would come out flush.

    It would be so HATED! :bananaman:bananaman
     
  11. |MaverickMat|

    |MaverickMat| '74 Grabber

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Vehicle:
    1974 Grabber

    Thanks ModMav :)
     
  12. Andysutt

    Andysutt '72 Comet GT

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Conway Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT
    if you do a MII swap you can put whatever you want in it pretty easily.
    I still say stay ford power but do what you want, its your car

    also realize that you have to buy a proper radiator, computer and harness, fuel pump and fuel plumbing to run a fuel injected motor
     
  13. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    after you cut out the shock towers and get custom headers made the amout of money you saved over the 347 should pay for the mustang II front end

    no ones telling you to buy a 10k crate motor, you can have an existing core built to a 347 for way way cheaper then that
     
  14. |MaverickMat|

    |MaverickMat| '74 Grabber

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Vehicle:
    1974 Grabber
    Yeah I realize that a crate is gonna be way pricier than getting a core motor and working that up. I'm just concerned about cranking power out of a stock 302. I know they're stout and can handle upwards of 600+ hp, but I feel I would want an aftermarket block just as a precaution. I'd hate to pour money into a 302 just to crack the block cause I'm welping on it run after run... and if I go from that premise, a crate LS2 is cheaper than a crate 347.

    Course the point was made that it's the modifications to the electrics/exaust/wiring/etc that'll catch up to me, and it's totally true. But in the end I have a very powerful and radically different hot rod... :thumbs2:
     
  15. Andysutt

    Andysutt '72 Comet GT

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Conway Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT

    Just as "radical" as everyone else with a LS motor.....

    Course that can be said with everyone with a 347 also

    But if it was me... Id spend the money on a MII and a good 347 or a 415w and call it a day
     

Share This Page