rear quarter panels replacement

Discussion in 'Cosmetic' started by pipman76, Oct 12, 2009.

  1. JDHill

    JDHill Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Location:
    San Diego, Calif.
    Vehicle:
    Maverick Grabber 1971
    :eek: Careful talking $ the Gov (Big O) might be listening. :drool:
     
  2. Boosha

    Boosha Built to run hard

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buckeye State
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Maverick,1964.5 Mustang,1966 T-Bird
    Nice work!:thumbs2:Looks good.:yup:
     
  3. brainsboy

    brainsboy Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    774
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Location:
    Tampa
    I think its important to note that the reproduction quarter panels are not the same on the bottom side. Who ever is making the part didnt buy the bottom die so the bottom rear side of the reproduction quarter panels is different than the originals. If I get around to it I will take some photos and post the differences
     
  4. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    523
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
    They are different for sure. I'm cutting up full quarters for patch panels as we speak. I was able to get them for $169 a side which I didn't think was that bad. I agree they can be made but there are some compound curves on the lower rear that I wouldn't want to try to replicate.
     
  5. Boosha

    Boosha Built to run hard

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buckeye State
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Maverick,1964.5 Mustang,1966 T-Bird
    Can someone post a pic of the section that is different of the orig.?
     
  6. Mavman72

    Mavman72 Gone backwards but lookin' forward

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6,759
    Likes Received:
    272
    Trophy Points:
    273
    Location:
    Buffalo N.Y.
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick 2 door.Original V-8 3 spd std shift.Also a 72 one owner Sprint sporting a 351 Windsor
    The bottom edge of the quarter does not have the pinchweld area like the originals do.
     
  7. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    523
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
    I can take some pics when I get home tonight.
     
  8. Boosha

    Boosha Built to run hard

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buckeye State
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Maverick,1964.5 Mustang,1966 T-Bird
    :tiphat: Thank You!
     
  9. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    523
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
    Forgot to do this last night, sorry. Hope these are good enough to help make sense of it.

    Here's the new one, it's flat on the bottom where it meets the trunk extension.
    [​IMG]

    Here's the original, where it meets the trunk extension it has an upside down trough so to speek on the bottom. It also has a different shape where it curves around the back by the valance but it doesn't show in the pics I took so I didn't post them.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  10. Boosha

    Boosha Built to run hard

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buckeye State
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Maverick,1964.5 Mustang,1966 T-Bird
    OK I see now.The "valley" is not present on the repro's.Is the rear section by the valance noticable or is it workable?
    Thanks for the pics.:Handshake
     
  11. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    523
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
    The rear by the valance is solid on mine so I left it. It is noticable but can most likely be worked around. I'll see if I can get better pictures and post them.
     
  12. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    523
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
    OK here we go. The big difference at the back is that they didn't even try to come close to the original. Take a look, I also included a pic of my solution which is to leave that section in place! Don't get me wrong here, I think these were worth every penny I paid for them but they aren't NOS quality for sure.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page