How close to perfect were they

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by 65 comet, Sep 22, 2010.

  1. facelessnumber

    facelessnumber Drew Pittman

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    Messages:
    3,710
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    Vehicle:
    '71 Grabber
    Exactly my take on it. I'm glad they didn't get Boss 302's, 4-speeds and 9's. If they did, I either wouldn't have a Maverick or I'd be too scared of devaluing my priceless artifact with the mods I've made.
     
  2. jncastell

    jncastell Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,016
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    100
    Location:
    Ogden, Utah
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick Grabber Clone
    First the last model should have been released in 1980 whith low production numbers from 78 to 80. It was an economy car so keeping it real; an accessible fuse box, a small console W/two drink holder, an electric button or a manual cable release for the rear quarter windows, dual sport mirrors and louvers an option on all models. Then unknown to most of the public like one of those rare unknown, unadvertised dealer option Special Packages That we see in those two big Muscle Car Magazines, and it seems they were former car dealers or knew one or stumbled upon the car. A 4 Barrel, W/Electric Choke, and Headers and maybe, just maybe a Deluxe Special Package Consisting of the 71-72 Grabber hoods W/71-72 Grabber Stripping and rear spoiler but it’s going to Cost You Baby! This aint your Grand Pa’s Horse-N- Buggy!!!
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  3. ford84stepside

    ford84stepside Lone Wolf

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,038
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    132
    Location:
    Berry Alabama
    Vehicle:
    1947 Lincoln Zephyr Coupe
    Economy car or not, even the Falcon got a few performance options. Should have offered a "Drag Pack" with a 4 barrell, trac loc rear, 3:55 or 3:73 gears, 4 speed, Heavy duty cooling, stiffer springs and shocks, etc. All that stuff was readily available on other models.:drive:
     
  4. sportyfamilycar

    sportyfamilycar ElMaverick

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Messages:
    714
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    KY
    Vehicle:
    (2) 77' Mavericks
    (y) i agree, the maverick wasn't given the variety of performance options as it's predecessor.
     
  5. darren

    darren Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,852
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    East of Dave
    Vehicle:
    72 302 Maverick
    I think the Mav was just a couple of years too late for those goodies. They didnt do the 302 cars till 71 and then came 72 and de-tuning/emmissions.
    Maybe it could have had those options if the 69.5 cars came 302 equipped. It would have given them a year or two feel out the market and add items like a drag pac.
     
  6. 69GT

    69GT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    60
    Location:
    Fresno
    Vehicle:
    72 Grabber Maverick.
    Ok... I think in 70 they should have had the 11" disks as an option on all 250 and up engines and 5-lug.

    The Grabber should have been like a mini Mach 1 and had the 2BBL 302 as the base and the J-Code 4BBL 302 as the top of the line with true dual exhaust and a 3.55 posi and 4-Speed optional.

    And of course the 302 4BBL H.O. Maverick Comes out in 71 and the motor is identical to a boss 302 with the option of a mini drag pack and 3.91s with the 4-Speed Detroit locker combo is available. And that would be the top dog :)
     
  7. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    Mavericks will never be everyones "perfect" car but they were built as econo-cars and were perfect for us to get 30 years later and mod to a point where they are perfect for us as individuals.
     
  8. wjtkb

    wjtkb Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    87
    Location:
    keystone heights fl
    Vehicle:
    maverick, 94 toyota pick-up, 94 honda accord
    There actually was a designe for a boss 302 maverick and i do belive only one was ever created. If anyone is interested please pm me and ill go find the article on it with all the details. Thanks
     
  9. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    538
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
    Kind of surprised this hasn't been mentioned but a proper power steering box would be great. As mentioned earlier a factory console would be nice too.
     
  10. Demmitt

    Demmitt nutz and boltz

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    70
    Location:
    Sandsprings, Oklahoma,
    Vehicle:
    1976 2 door, 1969.5 2 DOOR
    1968

    things i would have like to have seen.

    inside things like hood pop, door spekers, roll down 1/4 glass, rear defrost.
    rear The tride and true 9". rear disk.
    body power att, bobcat taillights, no marker lites.
     
  11. 69GT

    69GT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    60
    Location:
    Fresno
    Vehicle:
    72 Grabber Maverick.
    I heard of the Boss motored Maverick. My friend said it was a test mule that had the BOSS 302 with 4-Speed and 4.30s. It was faster than the up coming 429 SCJ Mustang from what he remembered.... and so away went the Maverick. Definitely would have cannibalized Mustang sales since it would have been cheaper. The Maverick had a brief identity crisis with the arrival of the Pinto as the real economy offering from ford. I do think Ford should have offered the J-Code 302, disk brakes, and 4-Speed. It's a no brainer.
     
  12. supermav

    supermav Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    267
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    122
    Location:
    clarkston wa.
    Vehicle:
    71 grabber,65 galaxie drag car,66 fairlane 2 door hardtop,64 falcon ranchero
    factory tach,4 speed and the j code 302
     
  13. GrabberJoe

    GrabberJoe Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2003
    Messages:
    997
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Brooklyn, Michigan
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick Grabber
    Ford did a lot with Maverick and Comet in the 8 years of production. A "Simple Machine" in 1969 to a sporty car to a V8 to 4 door. There were many trim options and some drive train options. As far as performance, I bought a new '74 Grabber with a V8. In '74 the Mustang II was far from a performance car. The Grand Torino Sport was a big car and no more fast back body style option. I can tell you from my own experience a Maverick with a V8 in '74 was feared especially on Telegraph rd here. Even new with no mods the car was quick and fun to drive. That car was $3900 new on a-plan a lot of money for a Maverick. A '74 Grand Torino Sport with a 460V8 was nice but not as quick as it once was and it was expensive. In my opinion a V8 Maverick was the best choice.
     
  14. sportyfamilycar

    sportyfamilycar ElMaverick

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Messages:
    714
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    KY
    Vehicle:
    (2) 77' Mavericks
    :Handshake i agree, it was by far not wimpy for its time. dad told me how he won alot of races in his 302 comet back in the day just by freeing up the exhaust and a 4 barrel.
     
  15. tim keck

    tim keck truckdrivintrailertrash

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    sharps chapel,Tn
    Vehicle:
    '72 Comet, '75 Maverick, '85 F150 4x4 ,'93 F150,'75 F100,'77 Jeep Wagoneer,'91 Dodge D250 Cummins,'90 F150 xtra cab 4x4, '93 F150 4x4
    Some options they easily could've offered;
    disc brakes
    4 barrel carbed 302
    4 speed
    dual exhaust
    more gear ratios up to at least 3.55
    a limited slip diff
    same engine bay as the Mustangs, allowing the factory install of 351s
    center consoles
    Sure, Ford didn't want the Mustang to have any internal competition, but the Duster/Nova guys got some sweet powertrain options, it would've been nice if the Maverick had too.
     

Share This Page