50th anniversary crash test (AMAZING!)

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by Recrdholdr, Mar 25, 2011.

  1. Recrdholdr

    Recrdholdr National Record Holder

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    77
    Location:
    London Ontario
    Vehicle:
    I want a 70-73 Maverick
    Not a Maverick but just shows how far we have come. Not at all what most would expect. The interior view in the second video says it all. OUCH. The third one I just threw in for fun. It's crash test of a Smart car LOL






     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2014
  2. mercgt73

    mercgt73 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    3,829
    Likes Received:
    354
    Trophy Points:
    223
    Location:
    Eastern Shore, Maryland
    Vehicle:
    1973 Comet GT (clone), 1974 Mustang II, 1980 Bobcat Wagon
    pretty cool, thanks. that smart car gets tossed...
     
  3. Wilbur Green

    Wilbur Green Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,254
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    121
    Location:
    Plymouth, Ohio
    Vehicle:
    76Stallion, 762dr.
    Neat but not for the weak got my blood flowing.
     
  4. Recrdholdr

    Recrdholdr National Record Holder

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    77
    Location:
    London Ontario
    Vehicle:
    I want a 70-73 Maverick

    Well it definately shows that all that metal around you isn't much good. Casr used to be made so the car would survive an accident now they are made so WE survive.
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2011
  5. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    that's unbeleiveable about the 59.
    Arent those full frames....x frame at that? which means it should have had hardly no damage..
    My buddy crashed his old 67 buick special doing 120 we did a 360 twice then the pass front hit the jersey barrier...only thing it needed was the bumper a new fender/grille and about 400 bucks in frame work...so again ..what the hell was wrong with that 59 lol

    heres a link
    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3092819/1967-buick-special
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2011
  6. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    i dontr think thats much so...they always built the car to make us survive...just theyre approach is different.
    vintage is made for the car to survive...since it doesnt give more harsh on our body..

    new cars are doing the same but with better seatbelts...use of air bags and crumble points to cushion the impact to make the crash less severe on the driver/passengers.

    between the extra give of the car to cusion the ill effects and air bags deploying detroying dashes/airbag replacement and what not...cost is too much to effectivly repair...so they usualy total out...
     
  7. Awesome_X

    Awesome_X Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Vehicle:
    2005 Rx8 with mods... hopefuly some time soon I will have another maverick and have time to work on it!
    I watched the first video a couple of times (on my cell) and I'm not for sure bit I don't see an engine in the old car when the front gets smashed open, I'm going to go watch it again.

    Okay watched it again twice and I still say the engine bay is empty, I think it would be harder to crush the front of that far if there was an engine in it. Not that it would make it any safer or anything just what I noticed and MO.
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2011
  8. 69GT

    69GT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    60
    Location:
    Fresno
    Vehicle:
    72 Grabber Maverick.
    I wonder how much difference having a six point cage would have made. Probably not much at that angle.
     
  9. w0ppe

    w0ppe Driver #11

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Bastion, Afghanistan
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick 4-Door, 4.1L
    This would explain why some of the older cars are actually relatively light vs. it's modern cousins... I know my Mazda weighs more than the Maverick despite it being much smaller, smaller engine, aluminum bodied, etc.
     

Share This Page