Sleeper Fairmount w/5.3l goes 9.95

Discussion in 'Drag Racing' started by olerodder, Sep 25, 2012.

  1. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
  2. MaverickDan

    MaverickDan I wanna go fast!!!

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2007
    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Midlothian, VA.
    Vehicle:
    73 Maverick 4dr
    That guy has a build thread on the turboforums, but can't believe he wasn't kicked out for not having a cage.
     
  3. Tannersg1

    Tannersg1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    1,345
    Likes Received:
    205
    Trophy Points:
    163
    Location:
    Classified
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
  4. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    That would certainly be a little humbling to have a 4dr Fairmount stage next to me beat me to the lights when I have a 6.7l and he has a 5.3l............that is a sweat little car.
     
  5. Wilbur Green

    Wilbur Green Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,254
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    121
    Location:
    Plymouth, Ohio
    Vehicle:
    76Stallion, 762dr.
    That is a cool package.
     
  6. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,689
    Likes Received:
    2,412
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    Yep cool, but... Welcome to 1955 when the SBC begin finding it's way under the hood of about every vehicle imaginable... As time goes on I'm bettin' we'll see more of these swaps because the fat girl 4.6(now 5.0) won't fit in many older chassis without cutting... Unless blown or has some $$$$ heads, the 4.6 won't make power anyway...
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2012
  7. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    those LS swaps are hard not to consider no matter how blue your blood is. Hell.. I even thought about it for my Comet build for more than a few minutes. It's a good time to build another "under-spec'd" Ford bullet to set the Chevy guys straight though. lol

    I see tons of LS's with turbo's out on the streets these days. Super easy to just add bolt ons and end up with a solid 11 second car that is otherwise bone stock and still weighs 4,000+ lbs with all the boom-boom stereo goodies in it. Hard to dismiss that bang for the buck.. even if you are anti-Chevy. :)
     
  8. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    You know, back some 40 years ago when I ran SS/IA (of which the class was dominated by Camaro's with SB's) the Ford was thought of as a "step child", and for the same money you could build a SBC that would run circles around the SBF. The Ford just didn't have the selection of "off the shelf" parts that Chevy did. Then it was pretty much a draw in the late 70's to the early 90's, but once again Chevy has pulled ahead in the SB world......and I for one would really like to build one again. Now, with that said I have to say the next leap for Ford will be with the Coyote 5.0...............the traditional OHV motor has just about come to the end of it's life cycle..................Chevy has been working on a SOC and DOHC SB and I'll bet even money it will replace the current SB.
     
  9. 65comet

    65comet Mark Sherman

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2010
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Erie, Co.
    Vehicle:
    2-65 Comet Caliente Hardtops 65 Comet 2 dr Sedan, 65 Mustang 2+2 Fastback, 68 F100 4x4, 1976 Pinto Sport Sedan, 2-79 F350's and 7 Grandson's
    You mean something like what Ford did back 1963
    Gentlemen, meet the 255 CID Quad Cammer. Average HP - 825 @ 9600 rpm and was reported to have been pushed to 1440 hp on the dyno before it came apart and that was on 103 octane pump gas.
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2013
  10. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    You forgot about the SOHC 312 that was developed in the late 50's.
    These are some of my favorite motors;
     
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2012
  11. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,689
    Likes Received:
    2,412
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..


    This is no doubt a Y block but how are the cams operated??? Has a conventional timing cover with no doubt a chain inside... Guessing this isn't the SOHC version you are referring to???



    [​IMG]

    The other three engines sure look a lot like the DOHC 4.6 in my Marauder... Would no doubt be a lot of fun in a lightweight body, unfortunately wont fit without some serious cutting...



    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2012
  12. olerodder

    olerodder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    Sorry, that isn't the picture of the of SOHC Y block, just your normal everyday
    Gurney Westlake induction system meant for racing. The early 289/305 Gurney Westlake's had a problem of cracking out the main web area producing over 550hp back in 1967................so they used the 312 block which was much stronger and actually made close to 600hp over 40 years ago.
    The three pictures are your 4.6l DOHC, and all you need to do in Maverick/Comet is message those ugly shock towers..............................and yes it would be neat.
     
  13. 65comet

    65comet Mark Sherman

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2010
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Erie, Co.
    Vehicle:
    2-65 Comet Caliente Hardtops 65 Comet 2 dr Sedan, 65 Mustang 2+2 Fastback, 68 F100 4x4, 1976 Pinto Sport Sedan, 2-79 F350's and 7 Grandson's
    Didn't fprget, just skipped to my favorite. What started as a 260, ends up a 255, cranks 9600+ rpm all day, (500 miles) pounding out 825+ hp back in 62-63 just puts warm fuzzies in the cockles of my old ticker. :yahoo:
    But don't think I don't have some soft spots for the other SOHC's and DOHC's.
     
  14. Derek 5oComet

    Derek 5oComet Tire burner

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,629
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Welland,Ontario,Canada
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet ,5.0L,5spd,9",3.89 trac lock, 12.40@110, 1967 Mercury Cougar 390 stick,1985 Mercury Capri 5.0,5 speed,1979 F150 4x4 460,1992 F150 Flareside,99 F250 SuperDuty V10
    Just read a little on that Fairmont,he's running 20psi boost and a big shot of nitrous!! It's got no choice to run fast.Take away the boost and spray its a 11 second car.
     
  15. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,539
    Likes Received:
    2,907
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    as with all the 302s on here...take away all that didn't come "stock" on a ford Mav/Comet and you have a...14.5 sec. car...:huh:
     

Share This Page