what should I put in my 302

Discussion in 'Technical' started by pil1sbury, Apr 15, 2013.

  1. pil1sbury

    pil1sbury MavBoy living life

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Virginia
    Vehicle:
    1974 FORD MAVERICK
    I swapping my 1974 250inline for a 1968 302. I'm rebuilding everything in it so I want about 300-350hp my buddy has a supercharged foxbody 5.0 he told me about a eagle rebuild kit for $800 on cjponyparts.com it can hold 600hp but what else should I get for the 302 unless you think there's something better I should do.
     
  2. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,831
    Likes Received:
    685
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    But the block won't hold 600 hp. You don't need those parts to make 350 hp. Power will come from well matched heads, cam, intake, and exhaust.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2013
  3. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,590
    Likes Received:
    2,935
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    5.0 roller block...:thumbs2:
     
  4. pil1sbury

    pil1sbury MavBoy living life

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Virginia
    Vehicle:
    1974 FORD MAVERICK
  5. rthomas771

    rthomas771 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,080
    Likes Received:
    969
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    GA
    Vehicle:
    '74 Maverick 302 5-Speed.'60 Falcon V8. '63.5 Falcon HT
    ...:huh:...
     
  6. ResidentEvilRoc

    ResidentEvilRoc Got bit by the HP bug.

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    602
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Rogersville, TN
    Vehicle:
    1973 Ford Maverick
  7. Bryant

    Bryant forgot more than learned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,538
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    71 Maverick
    That kit uses a stock diameter piston. Your 68 block will most likely need to be bored out and require pistons for the bigger bore.
     
  8. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,590
    Likes Received:
    2,935
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    Designed to be used with the Ford Racing M-6010-BOSS302 block.
     
  9. M.A.V.

    M.A.V. Yep,my real initials.

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,909
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Macon,Georgia
    Vehicle:
    1972 Grabber Maverick,1966 Fairlane GT Pro Street
    Yes... what Frank said. :thumbs2:
     
  10. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    X3 on what they said.
     
  11. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    Since it doesn't cost much more if anything.. it rarely makes much sense to build a stock stroke motor anymore.

    small stroke motor + bigger cam = 350 horse and decent torque

    larger stroke motor + smaller cam = 350 horse and major torque

    Unless you enjoy revving the snot out of your little motor more often(my personal preference).. the larger motor will be more flexible for gearing(higher torque), easier on parts(lower rpm), and generally more enjoyable to drive on a daily basis(broader powerband).

    Then as an added bonus.. later down the road you can always add bigger heads and supporting hardware to wind it up and make big power.
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2013
  12. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    Just FYI for the guy who posted this: You would be amazed at what a nearly stock Explorer 5.0 motor will do in these cars, without the added weight the Explorers carry. Just taking the Explorer (also Mountaineer) 5.0, swapping the EFI setup for a Performer RPM (or Weiand Stealth, or in my case a Ford A321 aka the old Cobra high rise) top it with a Holley 570 Street Avenger, keep the stock roller cam (256/266* Adv duration, 116.5 LSA) Improve the lift specs with a set of full roller 1.7 rockers (bolt on pedestal style) and you'll have a very torquey street friendly smooth reving motor that will melt the tires off the rear. And pull down 20+ mpg. The HP will be right there at 275-300 hp with 300+ ft/lbs of torque. You can do the same sans the GT40 heads by pulling a 5.0 from a 94-97 pickup or van that'll nearly do those numbers if you take an hour with a diegrinder and a porting bit to the E7TE exhaust ports. Same cam here, same short block, just different heads.
     
  13. Dave B

    Dave B I like Mavericks!

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    16,931
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Location:
    Parts Unknown......
    Vehicle:
    3 Grabbers
    Shhhhhhh! Don't give out the secret!! Throw in a T5 and it's loads of fun!!
     
  14. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,831
    Likes Received:
    685
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    Unless he can re-use his crank and rods and only needs to buy pistons/rings.
     
  15. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    I know, I ran one in my 89 Ranger with a Toploader 4 speed and a 3.73 rear (the equivalent to a Mav with a 3.50 geared rear with 25" tires) More fun than a barrel of monkeys. It would melt the 275/60's on the rear on demand. But that truck weighed in at 3550 lbs with me in it. In a 700 lb lighter car.......................:thumbs2::thumbs2:
     

Share This Page