Truck 5.0L vs. Mustang 5.0L

Discussion in 'Technical' started by Dave B, Aug 26, 2006.

  1. Dave B

    Dave B I like Mavericks!

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    16,931
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Location:
    Parts Unknown......
    Vehicle:
    3 Grabbers
    OK,
    Before I decide to take this van with the 5.0L/AOD combo, I was wondering if anyone knows what the difference (internal) between the Mustang 5L and the Truck 5L, I know that the firing order is different on the HO motor (so cam and crank?), but what else? I just don't want to pull the engine out of the truck if it's not going to be any good.
    I'll rebuild it before I put it in the Mav, but if it's not worth it..it's not worth the trouble..:drink:
     
  2. Hawkco

    Hawkco Genuine Car Nut

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    5,281
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    135
    Location:
    Rex, Georgia (GA)
    Vehicle:
    77 Maverick
    What year is the donor?
     
  3. Dave B

    Dave B I like Mavericks!

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    16,931
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Location:
    Parts Unknown......
    Vehicle:
    3 Grabbers
    1993 E-150
     
  4. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    I also have been looking at those E150s, but I think they were 351s, maybe E350s?
     
  5. tim keck

    tim keck truckdrivintrailertrash

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    sharps chapel,Tn
    Vehicle:
    '72 Comet, '75 Maverick, '85 F150 4x4 ,'93 F150,'75 F100,'77 Jeep Wagoneer,'91 Dodge D250 Cummins,'90 F150 xtra cab 4x4, '93 F150 4x4
    I'm gonna guess a more torque-oriented cam,cast pistons,not so good heads.Crank/rods are probably the same.If you're going to use the FI on your car the van intake is probably too tall to fit under your hood.For a(carbed) cruiser I'd say go ahead & get it,otherwise hold out for an '85-'94 mustang,'89-'93 T-bird orExplorer/Mountaineer motor.
     
  6. Jamie Miles

    Jamie Miles the road warrior

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    383
    Location:
    Lawrenceville, GA
    Vehicle:
    13 Mavericks
    Why those specific years? I have always heard '87 - '95 Mustangs. Also don't forget the 2 door Lincolns that had HO's in the early 90's. And from what I have seen, the Explorer/Mountaineers had good motors in them all the way up to '96 or '97.
     
  7. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    87-92 HOs are the way to go.
    They have all the good stuff, assuming you are not going to replace everything with the rebuild anyway. :huh:

    Roller cam
    Okay heads (for stock)
    Forged pistons
    Intake that will fit under hood
    W firing order

    With all that said, you need to consider some things...
    I'll go in order of that list:
    *The van has a roller block. So if you didn't want to use the bone stock cam anyway, you have the right block without going to HO.
    *Trucks and vans got the same head specs around 90, so no big gain. Not like the heads are anything super anyway.
    *HO forged pistons used until 92 are only a plus if the block and pistons can go back stock bore. So the truck engine having cast pistons might not be a drawback if you have to overbore anyway.
    *The truck/van intake lower manifold is much better flowing than a stock HO lower. The Holley upper can be used with a truck lower for best results. Otherwise use a GT40 from a late Exploder.
    *W firing order comes with whatever cam you use, not block.

    Fwiw:
    Later blocks and parts are thinner for weight savings.
    Truck engines have knock sensors and the computer needs that input to run best.
    Some later HOs use these sensors too I believe, but you need to know what you are working with if you keep the EFI.
    If you plan on using the EFI, you need to know if the engine is mass air or speed density. Mass air came on HO EFIs long before trucks got MAF. SD was on trucks for a few years. SD doesn't allow the engine to be modded while running the stock computer. The kit to convert to MAF from SD is expensive. I don't know which system is used on 93 trucks. If it is speed density (and you want to use EFI), I would seriously consider passing to find a MAF donor system. You can bolt it straight in and it will take to any mods you want to do. It is much more flexible.
    86 HOs were the first roller cams. They are the most radical stock roller cam. 87up guys used to put the 86 cam into their engines for a little boost without the expense of a new roller cam.

    Dave

    Edit:
    Forgot about the reverse water pump and related parts used on the truck engines. Trucks also came with double row true roller timing chains, but that does no good when you are replacing everything anyway.
    I am pretty sure Stangs had reversed pump and such as well, but many larger cars used regular water pumps well beyond the trucks and Stangs. Crown Vic 5.0s used them right up until the Mod engines replaced 5.0s, so it is a mixture out there. When I put a car engine in my EFI truck, I had to use the trucks timing cover and water pump, while keeping the car's distributor to use with the roller cam.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2006
  8. Dave B

    Dave B I like Mavericks!

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    16,931
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Location:
    Parts Unknown......
    Vehicle:
    3 Grabbers
    I'm getting this engine and trans for free, so I was figuring on rebuilding it all anyways, I just didn't want to find out that it would all make a better boat anchor, thanks for the info, I think I'll get the van over here and pull it apart, I have have a HO upeer and lower intake so I'll be using that to fit it into the Mav.
    Thanks!!
     
  9. eddie1975

    eddie1975 Windsor Specialist

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,226
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Martinsburg, WV
    Vehicle:
    sold
    good luck! keep us posted:drive:
     
  10. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    I might have a shot at a 88 5.0 town car with 40,000 miles, what do u think?
     
  11. tim keck

    tim keck truckdrivintrailertrash

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    sharps chapel,Tn
    Vehicle:
    '72 Comet, '75 Maverick, '85 F150 4x4 ,'93 F150,'75 F100,'77 Jeep Wagoneer,'91 Dodge D250 Cummins,'90 F150 xtra cab 4x4, '93 F150 4x4
    You're right on the LSC lincolns,forgot them.I meant any Explorer/Mountaineer motor(although I didn't word it right:slap: )And '85-95(I was off 1 year)Mustang motors are roller cammed.
     
  12. Dave B

    Dave B I like Mavericks!

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    16,931
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Location:
    Parts Unknown......
    Vehicle:
    3 Grabbers
    From what I'm told the truck engines had the roller cam also, and since I'll be rebuilding it we'll change the pistons, cam, and heads anyways. I finally got the motor out today, talk about one heck on a time, vans can be tough!! but it was worth it!!!
     
  13. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    They didn't get a roller cam until around 96.
    HOWEVER, they got the roller block in the 80s...
    So you can install a roller cam without much hassle.
    Need a roller compatable distributor gear though.
    Dave
     
  14. Comick76

    Comick76 Grease Monkey

    Joined:
    May 21, 2006
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Angelo, TX
    Vehicle:
    76 Comet
    The 5.0 HO was put in explorers and mountaineers up till about 98 or 99. Can't seem to remember what year they stopped. But they have all the best stock stuff. Good flow EFI(gt40) intake,heads. The cam is a little flat in my opinion. But they got Distributorless ignition and a real nice crank angle sensor. If you want EFI and like computers you can program almost any aspect.

    I allways heard all 302s had a roller from 86 on. Never had to take one apart though. I'm also getting a truck block for free. It's from a 89 Bronco. I know they are thin wall but, You can't get much thinner than my 77 302 that's .060 over.
     
  15. Dave B

    Dave B I like Mavericks!

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    16,931
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Location:
    Parts Unknown......
    Vehicle:
    3 Grabbers
    I'm going to be putting the motor on the stand today, so I'll see what shape it's in, I plan on doing a full rebuild anyways, so I'll make it close to a HO, but better.
     

Share This Page