Could you put a 4bbl on a I-6?

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by Fish OutOfWater, Nov 1, 2007.

  1. Fish OutOfWater

    Fish OutOfWater Brian

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2007
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    177
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick Grabber, 71 Plymouth 'cuda440-6
  2. rayzorsharp

    rayzorsharp I "AM" a Maverick!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    11,256
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    298
    Location:
    Grand Bay, Alabama
    Vehicle:
    Three 71 Maverick Grabbers, a 72 302 Sprint, a 73 LDO 2door parts car, a 76 silver v8 Stallion.
    Absolutely...but that's a truck motor. It won't fit the car (170, 200, 250) engines.
     
  3. don graham

    don graham MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,800
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    302
    Location:
    arizona city, az.
    Vehicle:
    70 mav, 71 grabber, 73 Comet, 2004 f-250 crew cab diesel, 2001 f-250, 2004 explorer, 2007 Gold Wing trike.
    why. won't do you any good. too much fuel and the car would run for crap most likely. unless you modified the heck out of it.
     
  4. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    youd really hav to open that thing up to breathe a 4bbl

    even the best hipo small six's are usually on 2bbls or a 3x1bbl set up
     
  5. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,576
    Likes Received:
    2,928
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    an older Gent here in town has a 4BBL on a 300 in a mid 70s' truck.
    it does pretty good in the 1/4 mile :yup: ...i'll see if i can get some #s next time i run into him at the machine shop...

    ...:outtahere:
     
  6. Andysutt

    Andysutt '72 Comet GT

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Conway Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT
    I agree.. you could but prob wouldnt do it on a otherwise stock engine
     
  7. 74bossmav

    74bossmav Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    23
    Location:
    Illinois Machesney Park
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick 2 door Brn.
    My guess is thats for a 300 6 cylinder and since that is just 2 cubic inches less than a 302 I don't know why that wouldn't make a significant difference in performance, especially with a few other goodies i.e. headersand cam. Because of the long strock it won't wind real high but you will have gobs of torque.
     
  8. Andysutt

    Andysutt '72 Comet GT

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Conway Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT
    That's exactly why some guys want 300's in their pulling trucks over a 302. More torque than the 302 and get just about the same gas mileage in stock forms in trucks.
     
  9. troberts289

    troberts289 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Lynden Washington
    Vehicle:
    1972 Ford Maverick
    Yeah, that intake is for the old 240 and 300 cubic inchers (which are inline 6's)... Which never came in the Maverick or Comets from the factory.. The 170 200 and 250 cid motors have their intake casted onto the head so its all one piece.. pretty dumb if you ask me. So only the little single barrel carbs are all that can be used on those motors.
     
  10. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix

    wanna bet? :rolleyes:

    2bbl_784424.jpg
     
  11. Fish OutOfWater

    Fish OutOfWater Brian

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2007
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    177
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick Grabber, 71 Plymouth 'cuda440-6
    So is the 300 a direct replacement for a 250? Sounds like a cool engine swap project. I bet you would get decent performance out of a Maverick with a warmed over 300-4v. Anyone ever put one in a Maverick or Comet on here? Make a nice stoplight to stoplight car...
    :hmmm:
     
  12. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    no, itf not really a direct replacment. the pic i posted is my 250 with a 2bbl carb
     
  13. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,576
    Likes Received:
    2,928
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    ...you would have to leave the hood off (too tall) and remove the radiator, radiator support and grille.(too long) :rofl2:

    ...:Handshake...
     
  14. mleega1

    mleega1 MAVERICK MARK

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    222
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    62
    Location:
    Lagrange, GA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick 2015 F150 2003 Explorer
    Go to classic inlines.com they have a new Alum hi po head for the 200,250 that you can run a 4 bbl or even fuel injection!

    I have an aussie head with a removable intake and a holley 2 bbl. for my 250:D
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2007
  15. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    I have seen several pics here of 300 powered Mavericks.
    They have all been drag cars, no street ones that I have seen.

    The engine fits, but not well.
    The problem is hood clearance.
    The 300 is a tall engine.
    Ones I have seen pics of usually have a tall hood scoop to clear the carb.
    Not centered on the hood though. Usually offset to one side. Looks funny.

    They are said to be very fast cars with the 300 in them.
    I'll have to find those pics and post them if no one else does.
     

Share This Page