ughhh some people...

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by newtoford, Jan 31, 2008.

  1. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    the silly things i argue with people about:D


    my friend has a '77 maverick siting on flats for years on the side of his house with the original 302 in it but siezed up. anyway he's telling how he was going to buy a '77 maverick 302 engine off ebay for $1000 down in NC but the guy was trying to screw him or something so he didnt get it. so i said that we can probably roll down the junk yard tomorrow and get a running 5.0 for a few hundred. he tells me he doesnt want to convert it from fuel injection. i explain to him that thats not really a big deal since his current 302 can provide us with all or atleast most of the conversion pieces. he then goes on to tell me he doesnt want a 5.0 cause theyre crap and actually less cubes then a 302. according to him "a 5.0 is actually a 289 or something less then a 302". thats when i just gave up lol. the only reason i suggested a EFI 5.0 is because i know there wonldnt be any carb'd running sbf's in our local yards since there so old, on top of that i figure a roller motor might be a little better anyway.


    ive already tried to buy the car off him but he's not budging so i figure i could atleast get him in the right direction to get it backon the road. its a '77 2 door with small bumpers, grabber hood and spoiler, buckets, floorshift c4, v8 p/s, p/b, in black primer. he paid $2300 for it and blew the engine in 2 weeks a few years ago. been sitting on the side of his house since
     
  2. CaptainComet

    CaptainComet Large Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    5,003
    Likes Received:
    443
    Trophy Points:
    438
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    Blew the engine 2 weeks after getting it and thinks that a 5.0 isn't a 302 ...

    If he is that dim-witted, give it a couple more years and you'll own that car cheap. :oops:
     
  3. stangclone

    stangclone Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    ofallon,il
    Vehicle:
    1972 maverick,1965 mustang
    a 5.0 is a 302 a 289 is a 4.6L
     
  4. jmdotter

    jmdotter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northern NJ
    Vehicle:
    None Yet :(
    5.0L is actually really a 4.94L (301.9 cid)

    289 is a 4.72L (288.5 cid)

    4.6L is a 281 Mod motor.

    :D

    I've heard that the 5.0L blocks ARE weaker. They say the block will split in half much over 550 HP (Mustang guys). But for a daily driver... :rolleyes::burnout:


    I'm with CaptainComet, sounds like he'll give up and sell it eventually.
     
  5. Jamie Miles

    Jamie Miles the road warrior

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    383
    Location:
    Lawrenceville, GA
    Vehicle:
    13 Mavericks
    Yep. I think about any stock block 302 is a ticking time bomb past 500 horse, 5.0 or not.
     
  6. 302mav76

    302mav76 Isaac Serna

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    602
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    92
    Location:
    Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick
    I've seen mexican blocks (302m :rofl:) and the main webs are a lot thicker than a regular 5.0 . BTW, Mexican 302's stopped being produced until 1984.
     
  7. don graham

    don graham MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,800
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    302
    Location:
    arizona city, az.
    Vehicle:
    70 mav, 71 grabber, 73 Comet, 2004 f-250 crew cab diesel, 2001 f-250, 2004 explorer, 2007 Gold Wing trike.
    JUst tell him to put a 460 in it.:biglaugh:
     
  8. graflexmaster

    graflexmaster New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1976 Comet 2DR
    NAW....... He just needs to put a 427SOHC motor in, complete with the Tri-Power intake with three Holly 2300's and a Paxton supercharger........ Although with that set-up.... he'd probably be too scared to even take it out of the driveway....lmao:rofl:
     
  9. jmdotter

    jmdotter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northern NJ
    Vehicle:
    None Yet :(
    Better make it three Paxtons, being that it is a tri-power and all...

    :yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:

    Assuming the car doesn't flip over when you turn the key, sounds like a plan :D.
     
  10. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    Graflexmaster...I think you have room in your garage for at least one more car....:D

    Love the avatar...I missed the one aurora that occurred when I live in Kent, WA due to overcast skies. Still need to see them before I leave this place.
     
  11. cenc1984

    cenc1984 killa 72

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Location:
    Middleburge FL.
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick Grabber
    I have A blow 289 and my question is. will the parts off of a 5.0 motor fit onto a 289? if so please help on the conversion.
     
  12. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    the crank and rods are diffrent between a 289 and 302
     
  13. Maverick73

    Maverick73 Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    Messages:
    3,471
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    128
    Location:
    Lakeland, FL
    Vehicle:
    '73 Maverick 2 Dr, '73 Maverick LDO 4 Dr, '73 Maverick 4 Dr Parts Car
    What an idiot lol. 5.0 isn't a 302.
     
  14. cenc1984

    cenc1984 killa 72

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Location:
    Middleburge FL.
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick Grabber
    what i ment was .will the intake and heads off of the 289 work on the 5.0 ?
     
  15. CaptainComet

    CaptainComet Large Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    5,003
    Likes Received:
    443
    Trophy Points:
    438
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    Physically, the 289 heads and intake ought to go right on a 5.0 block. You want to be sure to use intake manifold gaskets for the earlier heads because the water passages are shaped different. I believe the chamber size on the 289 heads will be smaller and you will need to check your combo so that you aren't running the compression up higher than you want to. Sorry I don't have more specifics there. You might want to start another thread in the Tech section. Somebody here will know more.

    If your 5.0 is a roller cam motor, you also will want to run a distributor gear made for that. A roller cam will wear an old style distributor gear out in no time.

    You will also want to group the accessory drive. You don't want to mix and match, because some later water pumps are reverse rotation. If you stick with the early stuff, you ought to be OK, and your heads have holes in the right places, etc.

    Balance on the later 302s is 50 oz, not 28 like the 289, so you need a flexplate or flywheel balanced for that. The harmonic balancer used should be the 5.0 unit also. Don't know if an earlier crank pulley bolts to that.

    Firing order is different on 5.0 (I think) and you will need to change to that.
     

Share This Page