What do you think of dipping parts

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by Tlowery643, Aug 10, 2009.

  1. Tlowery643

    Tlowery643 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,079
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Rockmart, Georgia
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick
    I used to do alot of electrical work for Unpaint Corporation in Atlanta, they would dip from small parts to whole car bodies, they come out bare metal! Talked to him and he is now in Lagrange, Ga so still within range of me. This is done by weight at $2.00 a pound, so what does a fender weigh or small bumpers or hood etc...could save lots of work?
     
  2. Duck Tape Mav.

    Duck Tape Mav. ready to pick up the 4-dr

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2008
    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vilonia, Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1977 Duck tape Ford Maverick;1957 Ford Ranchwagon
    from what i've seen, dipping works good and is better than media blasting. it gets all the crevices and you're not stuck cleaning up the media you blasted it with for the rest of the cars natural life. (i don't know if it gets that bad, but i've heard stories.)
     
  3. Mavman72

    Mavman72 Gone backwards but lookin' forward

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6,759
    Likes Received:
    272
    Trophy Points:
    273
    Location:
    Buffalo N.Y.
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick 2 door.Original V-8 3 spd std shift.Also a 72 one owner Sprint sporting a 351 Windsor
    If you dip small simple parts like fenders/bumpers you should be ok.Doing a whole body shell presents a big problem.I dont care how you do it,you wont get all the acid out of the nooks and crannies of the shell.You wont know it either till the fresh paint is a few days old.Simple parts with out the hiding places you cant get to to clean em completely.Should be fine.
     
  4. darren

    darren Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,852
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    East of Dave
    Vehicle:
    72 302 Maverick
    Everything that came off my car was dipped. It comes out beautiful assuming its not full of filler. Then you get back pieces.
    Cost me total of 340 dollars for all panels.Hood,trunk,doors,fenders,valences. No comparison to the labor and product cost to use stripper. Just stripping the shell was enough work. The only issue is you have to be very careful after painting and do a good job of rustproofing. The hood and trunk are the most difficult to rustproof in the frame work. I would do it again. It saves so many hours of work.
    The panels are dipped and stripped then rinsed in a glycol base to neutralize the chemicals and add some corrosion inhibitors.
    The panels look like the day Ford stamped them. Its impressive. You wash them down and prime them ready for body work.

    Mavman is right I wouldnt do a shell. Too many places to hide chemicals.
    If your hood and trunk are fairly clean you may consider doing them by hand. My hood was a mess I didnt have much choice.
    I used a few cans of white lithium spray in the door shells. Lots of rust proofing in my panels.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2009
  5. mashori

    mashori Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,630
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, Ca
    Vehicle:
    1971 V8 Maverick
    you got a really good deal for that $350 you paid. It would seem really worthwhile for the smaller parts.
    I have no idea how much the small bumpers weigh. I remember my front was pretty heavy, maybe 60? The rear was heavier, I'd say less than 80. That's my guess, I can't be too far off.
     
  6. 1973Maverick357

    1973Maverick357 Cooler then a Camaro

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,082
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    89
    Location:
    Cookeville TN
    Vehicle:
    1976 stallion,1973 2dr mav,1975 2 dr comet,1964 F100,1970 Mav Grabber
    Rear Bumper weighs like 19 or 20 pounds i believe.
     
  7. darren

    darren Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,852
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    East of Dave
    Vehicle:
    72 302 Maverick

    Yep really good deal. Somehow I dont think the cash made it into the till.:rolleyes:
     
  8. Acornridgeman

    Acornridgeman MCCI Wisconsin State Rep Moderator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    6,516
    Likes Received:
    959
    Trophy Points:
    426
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick Grabber, 72 Maverick Grabber Restomod
    Gunk tanking. Yes!
    I use to do this all the time "back in the day" when I had access to a company outside Milwaukee that did it cheap. They are long gone now. A victim of EPA rules and forced out by urban sprawl. Funny, developers buillt houses all around the place and then the neighbors complained about the smell. :hmmm:

    The results are amazing. Eats away layers of paint, bondo, ect. It is a water soluble product, so copious amounts of water are needed to clean out the nooks and crannies. I then would use a neutralizer wash and self etching primer in the hidden areas and Ditzler red oxide primer on everything.

    Ah.. the good old days ............ :bouncy:
     
  9. brainsboy

    brainsboy Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    774
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Location:
    Tampa
    Have you ever wondered why our cars have not rusted from the inside out? Well maybe some of ours have in spots but If you think about it, inside the frame rails, under the hood and trunk supports do not have paint.

    The reason that they do not rust is that many spots on ford cars including mavericks and comets have a special aluminum coating applied to under the cowl, lower frame rails, outside of lower rails, and other spots. This allows ford to assemble the cars without paint and keeps unpainted panels from rusting. Acid dipping removes all these coatings. Cars that have been acid dipped will look great at first but will eventually rust from the inside out. IMO acid dipping is great for a showcar that may only see 25 to 50 miles a year and is kept in an air controlled garage.
     
  10. Tlowery643

    Tlowery643 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,079
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Rockmart, Georgia
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick
    Good point, I was told to be sure and use a self etching primer instead of just primer, heard it is a little expensive, is that true?
     
  11. darren

    darren Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,852
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    East of Dave
    Vehicle:
    72 302 Maverick
    Our guys washed the panels with water then sprayed my panels with something called metal prep. It smells like acid. Then they were primed/sealed.
     
  12. Cpt. Bondo

    Cpt. Bondo Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    630
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    67
    Location:
    Summerville, South Carolina
    Vehicle:
    (2) '72 Comet GTs, 68 Mustang
    Back in the days when I was doing Auto Restoration and Customization for a living we would send out the removable parts of the vehicle we were working on to be dipped, but not the body. For the body, we would use chemical paint stripper and good old fashioned sanding. We would have the frames media blasted (when they were removable ie: not a unibody).

    Like was stated earlier, the reason we wouldn't dip the body or frames is getting everything out of the rockers was imposable and it will remove the coatings to prevent rust inside the parts you can't get to and refinish to prevent rustout.

    Honestly, if I were considering doing it to one of my cars that is the way I would still go. You'll have less headaches in the long run and you really DON'T want to see a painter find out the hard way that there was chemical still in the crevices of a body he's spraying, trust me.:cussing: :yikes::outtahere:

    Hope this answers your question,
    -Scott H.
     
  13. gtcomet71

    gtcomet71 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    19
    Location:
    Mt. Vernon Ky.
    Metal prep is an etching solution. This provides the primer something to adhere to. If you use a good self etching primer such as Dupont variprime this step can be skipped.
     
  14. whisky

    whisky Whisky

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Messages:
    394
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    65
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet I-6, 72 Comet V-8
    Is that why?... I always wondered since I've stripped part of my car and there is no paint at all under the trim... still amazed at how little rust there is (or ISN'T....!!!) in some areas.

    But wouldn't self etching primer then regular primer be enough to prep and seal clean metal so it will last "another 40 years..."...?
     
  15. Cpt. Bondo

    Cpt. Bondo Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    630
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    67
    Location:
    Summerville, South Carolina
    Vehicle:
    (2) '72 Comet GTs, 68 Mustang
    Actually, no. Most primers are porous and absorb water causing rust to form under the primer and work from the bottom up. Primer / sealers would work for a short time, but they have an application life after you spray them and would end up doing the same thing as regular primer.

    There are a couple of epoxy primers out there that actually seal the metal and would do like you are describing, but those tend to be expensive.

    Hope this helps answer your question,
    -Scott H.
     

Share This Page