300 six swap issues??

Discussion in 'Transmissions' started by Onefunponcho, Dec 12, 2009.

  1. Onefunponcho

    Onefunponcho Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Des Moines, wa
    Vehicle:
    1973 maverick
    Good day
    Im considering swapping from a 250 l6 to a 300 l6. Currently my mav is a three speed manual. I have read that the bell housings are the same but are the flywheels the same? can I use my current flywheel, starter...I would like to avoid running a truck transmission they just seem to massive for the transmission tunnel. In a perfect world I could just bolt it up to my old tranny? Fab the mounts, modify z-bar and presto!

    Has anyone done this or a similar swap? Is the extra 50 cubes worth all the effort.

    Any help would be great
    M
     
  2. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,822
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    Take some measurements, from what I've heard from others who considered this swap the 300 is physically huge compared to a 250.
     
  3. sierra grabber

    sierra grabber Certifiable

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    2,808
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    northern nevada
    Vehicle:
    71 grabber red and black; 74 2dr LDO comet
    if your thinking of work levels, putting in a 302 would be a way easier swap. or build up the 250 if you want to stick with a six. putting the 300 in would be harder than a 351 swap IMO, but if you want to do it badly it can be done.....
     
  4. maverick maniac

    maverick maniac Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2009
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    owensboro ky
    Vehicle:
    72 sprint v/8 3 grabbers 73 comet and a 77 comet race car
    the motor is to long to fit in with the radiator in the stock location it will have to be moved to the other side of the core support . it has been done but agree with others that it would be better to put v/8 in .
    the 300 was intended to pull at low RPM and really don't even get very good MPG .
    but if you want to do the project the trans will bolt to the truck bell you will need to use the bell,, flywheel from the truck ,,,,
     
  5. Onefunponcho

    Onefunponcho Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Des Moines, wa
    Vehicle:
    1973 maverick
    Indeed i must admit that the more i read into it seems to be alot of work for little gain....It sure would be different though.....I think thats why it is so tempting.
     
  6. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    I say go for it! :) use the search function, theres a few pics of 300powered mavs out there.
     
  7. Jeff S

    Jeff S Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    Messages:
    894
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Location:
    NoVA
    Vehicle:
    none
    [​IMG]

    Put your hand up to the monitor, thumb on left side of square and pointer on the other end of square, use the other hand and put pointer at top and thumb at bottom.

    pull your hands away from monitor.

    Now take a long hard look at it...thats the only difference between having 2 more cylinders :biglaugh:
     
  8. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    There's a huge difference between the performance of a 300 six and a 302. The 300 has a 4" bore and 4" stroke. The 302's is 4" bore & 3" stroke. The 300 will make its power lower in the powerband and produce more torque vs a 302. But all that said, neither made good truck engines with the option of the 351's 400 and 460's available.
     
  9. Onefunponcho

    Onefunponcho Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Des Moines, wa
    Vehicle:
    1973 maverick
    I agree that you wouldnt want to rev a six to much. I cant imagine the extreemly long crankshaft or camshaft would hold up to the harmonics and vibrations of high rpm use. Big low rpm torgue can accelerate a car well also. for example the 455 olds, pontiac and buicks of the early 70's they were low on hp but monsters of torque! and they never had to wind past 5000 rpm.

    I had figured a performance 300 build to be on small scale of these
    *low compression
    *head porting for low lift velocity
    * cam about 212 dur @ .50
    * good small 4 brl

    Should have gobs of torque, a low shift point, and last forever and if you want it to pull harder at the track just spray some nitrous in it when your at the track.

    :drive:

    Just need to figure out how to make it fit in the mav and look like it belongs
     
  10. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    Most 7 main six cylinders can rev easily to 6000.
    Much over that will cause harmonic forces that can be destructive.
     
  11. Onefunponcho

    Onefunponcho Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Des Moines, wa
    Vehicle:
    1973 maverick
    Good to know :idea:

    If over 6000 rpm beter have some kitty litter with for clean up :rofl2:

    Thanks for the info
     

Share This Page