Prototype Boss Maverick pic in MCR

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by oppd08, Feb 28, 2010.

  1. oppd08

    oppd08 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bellevue, NE
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick, 72 Maverick 4-door
    Has anyone seen the discussion and pic on the last page of the March 2010 Muscle Car Review?

    Maverick_art29.JPG

    They listed it as a "never-before-published photo of the never-quite-made-it-to-production Boss Maverick."

    Sorry, I haven't figured how to load my home gallery pics as thumbnails so its a pretty small view.
     
  2. oppd08

    oppd08 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bellevue, NE
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick, 72 Maverick 4-door
    It looks like it was a 70 Mav with blackout grill, chin spoiler, Magnum 500s, a hockey stick stripe and the BOSS above the Maverick logo. I think the car shown in the pic was a dark metallic green. Wonder what the drive train would have been...guessing a boss 302/4-spd? Looks like they held off and built the Grabber Mav the next year.
     
  3. Bum's_Steer

    Bum's_Steer Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    787
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Maverick 2-dr. (Grabber clone) 1970 Maverick 2-dr.
    Well, in 69 and 70, when it said Boss on the fender, it had a Boss engine under the hood.....so I'd agree, Boss 302, 4-speed.

    Can you imagine! If only they had followed through.

    .
     
  4. darren

    darren Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,852
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    East of Dave
    Vehicle:
    72 302 Maverick
    Yeh right. The guys in the Mustang dept. would have a stroke. :mg:
    A lighter, faster car to compete for Stang sales that were directly linked to the Trans Am series. Not a chance of that happening.
    Think of what we would have had if they chose to run the Maverick instead of the Stang in the Trans Am series. Of course then most of us wouldnt be able to afford the Mavs we have right now. :huh:
     
  5. soooulpower

    soooulpower Semi-Informed Tinkerer

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,320
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Mapleton Depot, Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    2 1974 four door Mavericks, one Black, one pastel lime
    Bingo!! Thoughts like this constantly occur to me when I look across the humble past of our cars.
     
  6. JesTer

    JesTer Boo, the JesTer

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2009
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Olathe, Kansas
    Vehicle:
    1976 Maverick
    Fords mistake is our gain
    :bouncy:
     
  7. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!

    That's true! if they had built a boss maverick our cars would be a whole lot more popular, and they would use bunch of them for clone and tribute cars.
     
  8. Bum's_Steer

    Bum's_Steer Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    787
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Maverick 2-dr. (Grabber clone) 1970 Maverick 2-dr.

    "Mustang guys" were Ford guys first and foremost.......just like Chevrolet built high-perf Camaros, Chevelles, Impalas, Corvettes......yeah, having both the Maverick and Mustang in Trans-Am racing might of generated some in-house competition, but I doubt the Maverick could have dominated either the Mustang or Trans-Am...no particular make or model ever really did.....As for the Maverick instead of the Mustang,...Chrysler never had a problem running both Challegers and 'Cudas (Mopar made a factory T/A package for each) Chevy ran Camaros, Corvettes, and,...well,...Trans-Ams! Ford could have run both, Mustangs and Mavericks....it didn't have to be either/or,....and having both involved in Trans-Am would have only increased sales of both, not taken away sales of one or the other

    I think what happened to ideas like the "Boss" Maverick was in 70, the Mustang was already 5 years a proven seller with a rep.....the Maverick was new, and Ford was probably already thinking bigger....literally.....remember the "Mid-size" behemoths that started coming out? The Fairlanes became Torinos and started getting larger, the Galaxies and LTD's got HUGE, even the T-Bird was growing into a land yacht. While Chevrolet was making El Caminios based on the mid-size performance Chevelle, Ford made Ranchero's first off the much enlarged Torino, then the Gigantor LTD luxo-liners.

    They had the Mustang for performance and racing, the Maverick was economy....it's alot like today....Ford's got the Mustang for performance and racing,.....that seems to be enough for them.......Dodge has the Charger and Challenger (had the Magnum) and even makes a killer SRT8 Jeep....Chevrolet has the Camaro and the Vette....looks like the Firebird/Trans-Am might be making a comeback too.

    Performance-wise, Ford's literally been "One trick pony" since the 70's
     
  9. darren

    darren Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    4,852
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    East of Dave
    Vehicle:
    72 302 Maverick
     
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2010
  10. facelessnumber

    facelessnumber Drew Pittman

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    Messages:
    3,710
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    Vehicle:
    '71 Grabber
    That seemed to work out alright for the Nova, and I don't think it hurt the Camaro too much.

    Still, I'm glad Ford left it up to us to bring Mavericks into muscle car territory.
     
  11. oppd08

    oppd08 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bellevue, NE
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick, 72 Maverick 4-door
    I'm thinking that a 70 Mav with Ford's new Boss 302, some minor suspension upgrades and Magnum 500s could wear that prototype stripe and BOSS lettering legitimately...not a Mustang Boss copy...what do you guys think? :huh::thumbs2:
     
  12. oppd08

    oppd08 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bellevue, NE
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick, 72 Maverick 4-door
    As far as comparison to Mopars, I think the Maverick would fall more along the lines of the Duster or Demon rather than the Cuda or Challenger. No Trans Am heritage but lots of exposure at the drag strip. There were some neat 340 Dusters around...I remember a guy with a nice Pepto-Pink one across the street when I was a kid.
     
  13. Corbin Johnson

    Corbin Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    3,726
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    148
    Location:
    Sonoma County, California
    Vehicle:
    73 LDO, 72 Sprint, 70 Grabber.
    Anyone have a larger picture?
     
  14. predfan2001

    predfan2001 David in Tn

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,345
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    122
    Location:
    Clarksville Tn
    Vehicle:
    70 Mav 75 Comet 64 Comet 68 Mustang
    I got a scan of the article
     

    Attached Files:

  15. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    538
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
    Thoought about building a street boss for the Grabber but decided to go modern with an injected 5.0. It would be cool if that car were to be found stuck in the corner of a warehouse somewhere!

    Pontiac is dead so if it did come back it just wouldn't be the same.
     

Share This Page