AOD or C6 Trans in my 76 Mav 250?

Discussion in 'Technical' started by gmatthew76, Jan 24, 2011.

  1. gmatthew76

    gmatthew76 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2011
    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Freeport, Fl
    Vehicle:
    1976 2 dr Maverick, 1977 2dr Maverick,1998 Ranger, 2004 Focus Wagon
    I tried out my little 76 Maverick for the first time since I got the the engine running, and fixed the brakes. My maiden voyage around the block didn't go as planned. The transmission wouldn't shift by itself, so I tried manually shifting through the gears. 1st, and 2nd seemed to go ok, but when I got to 3rd I got nothing but a strange noise. A friend of mine suggested I check the vacuum to the modulator valve. While I didn't think vacuum would have any thing to do with not having a third gear, I gave it a shot anyway. He was right about one thing, there was no vacuum at the nipple on the carb where the trans line connected, so I moved it to an unused nipple on the intake manifold. On my next trip the trans actually shifted on its own, but 1st, and 2nd only. It would never even try to go to 3rd. I only got about 40 mph out of the old girl.
    What do you guys think? Is it time for a new tranny? I checked around at all the local salvage yards, and nobody has a C4. I was able to find a nice old man in a neighboring town who has a C6 out of an old truck, and an AOD out of a later model ford. Will either of these bolt up, and work with my 250 Inline 6?
     
  2. don graham

    don graham MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,800
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    302
    Location:
    arizona city, az.
    Vehicle:
    70 mav, 71 grabber, 73 Comet, 2004 f-250 crew cab diesel, 2001 f-250, 2004 explorer, 2007 Gold Wing trike.
    I would hunt around for another c4. I don't think the c6 will fit without an adapter and the AOD will probably be a real dog with the stock gears in your rear end.
     
  3. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    The modulator valve could be stuck or leaking. As for junkyard transmissions, you've already got one of those now. Get it rebuilt and save yourself the hassles of a transmission swap. Get someone (like PaulS) who knows their way around C-4's to look at it.
     
  4. flynbrd

    flynbrd Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    48
    C4 cheap fix, for long term go AOD. It will cost more but you can run better gears and have OD.
     
  5. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    538
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
  6. Fish OutOfWater

    Fish OutOfWater Brian

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2007
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    177
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick Grabber, 71 Plymouth 'cuda440-6
    I think an AOD with a lower set of gears in the rear might be a nice combo with an I-6. Still not as simple, or as cheap as the C-4. C-6 would be overkill and make no sense at all. I think the trans tunnel and rear mount would have to be modified for that to fit. Hardly makes sense unless a c-4 cant hold the power. I dont recall if anyone on here has a AOD equiped I-6. Sounds like a good idea to me.
     
  7. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    Unless you plan on running very low gears stick with a C4. They have lower parasitic losses (better mileage) and in stock form lasted 20 years and more from the factory. If you want crisper shifts and longer life from the C4 all you need is a TransGo 40-2 reprogramming kit and a cooler.
     
  8. Fish OutOfWater

    Fish OutOfWater Brian

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2007
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    177
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick Grabber, 71 Plymouth 'cuda440-6
    Is there any differance between the trans go and a B&M Transpak?
     
  9. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    Yes, there is a big difference between the TransGo and B&M. TransGo has the best engineered kit on the market for the C4. You never have problems with flare, too firm a shift (it is throttle controlled) and you have complete manual control over 1st and 2nd upshift and downshift. Pressures are raised SLIGHTLY but not to an extreme and shift events are better timed and just as quick. Unless you want to go through the effort to trace the oil flow and calculate flow and restrictions to size orfices then TransGo is as good as it gets.
     

Share This Page