A few questions for you sbf guru's :D

Discussion in 'Technical' started by josh thomas, May 22, 2011.

  1. josh thomas

    josh thomas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Fort Bragg, NC
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick
    Just have a few stupid questions to ask I promise :D lol

    Got a pretty stock 302 in the maverick now.

    Was thinking of doing a mild cam, edelbrock intake, new carb, and new ign.

    Any suggestions on a good cam?

    If I went with a msd 6al , blaster 2 coil, and pro billet distributor would I need to consider anything else?

    The stock dizzy looks to be vacuum advanced.... I assume anyway since there is a line going to it lol. If I got to a pro billet dist can I just do away with all the vacuum crap?

    Anything to consider when doing an intake swap?

    Any suggestions on a good carb for said upgrades on an otherwise stock 302 with headers? Any specifics... Last thing I put a carb on was a built 358 sbc and I remember there just being a million options......downleg spun boosters, etc etc etc.

    Thanks
     
  2. tody

    tody Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,835
    Likes Received:
    218
    Trophy Points:
    178
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    cologne, germany
    Vehicle:
    72 comet gt, 67 club wagon, 65 mustang
    that 'vacuum crap' as you call it is actually the main thing to improve gas mileage when cruising. you wouldn't want to get rid of that. i suggest using a complete duraspark system, or if you're set on the msd box, hook that up to a duraspark distributor.
     
  3. josh thomas

    josh thomas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Fort Bragg, NC
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick
    I'm not to aweful concerned with gas mileage... well not at all for that matter lol. I really just hate vacuum lines, just one more thing to check all the time when diagnosing a problem.

    So I'd rather not have any vacuum lines if I could help it. I'd take the msd mechanical advance over the vacuum in a heartbeat :D
     
  4. Joe Dirt

    Joe Dirt BBF life

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    4,375
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Cleveland, TN
    Vehicle:
    1970 ford torino #1
    You say mild but don't care about milage? What will be the primary use? Plans for a stall and gear?
     
  5. josh thomas

    josh thomas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Fort Bragg, NC
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick
    Was saying mild considering I have no stall :D I'm trying not to sink money into the tranny until I build one for a new motor but I'd throw a low rpm stall in if I had to.
    I'm throwing in a set of 4.10's so I'll have enough gear lol

    I'm not really trying to sink a ton of money into the 302 just trying to make it a fun streetable car until I can get my hands on a 331 or 347.

    But no, I don't give a hoot about gas mileage. My mustang averages about 15mph and my nova maybe 7mpg when I had it. I got the wifes car for trips, so my toys might as well be fun lol
     
  6. josh thomas

    josh thomas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Fort Bragg, NC
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick
    Just to clarify with the cam:

    Best cam for a stock 302 with headers, stock heads, stock valve train, etc etc etc
    I'd be willing to throw in a low rpm stall if I needed to and will have a set of 4.10's installed before the cam goes in.
     
  7. Mr 4 Speed

    Mr 4 Speed Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Vehicle:
    1970 Grabber
    Flat tappet or hydraulic roller?
     
  8. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    That's my .02.
     
  9. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    If you want to use the factory converter then the cam you need is something with nomore than 214 duration @ .050" with .450 - 480" lift. The fact that you are not planning on installing new pistons to gain compression means that going larger than that on the cam is likely to be less desireable anyway. You are ;ooking at a maximum HP red line of 5500 RPM. As unpopular as they seem to be here the Edelbrock Performer manifold is an excellent choice. Edelbrock markets the cam, manifold and kit for exavtly your application.
     
  10. flynbrd

    flynbrd Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    48
    a few ideas

    Before you move forward you'll need to address the limitations of your motor.
    1. what compression are you running?
    2. flat tappet right?
    3. engine milage?
    4. exhaust?

    Ignoring limitations best bang for the buck
    1. get a set of good condition gt-40 heads 250$
    2. air gap intake. (try to avoid china knock off!) 200$
    3. roller rockers.. 150$
    4. Dizzy (cheap coil, and disp upgrade) 60$
    5. ProForm center section (if you have a holley) 125$
    6. Cam... Pauls is on the mark there... 150$?

    so around 935$
    figure 1k after filler stuff.
     
  11. josh thomas

    josh thomas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Fort Bragg, NC
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick
    Thanks for all the info guys.

    Seems like a lot of people are going a little crazy cause I said the vacuum was crap. I'm just trying to get rid of it. I don't like the looks of a bunch of vacuum lines running around and it just seems like a hassle when I could upgrade to a non vacuum advance. I'm not looking to save gas mileage looking strictly for performance upgrades.


    The exhaust is a set of hooker headers

    Unknown compression and mileage of the engine as it was originally a I6 car.

    Yes to the flat tappet... unless its worth going to a hyd cam and swapping to a roller setup

    Thanks again for all the info.
     
  12. josh thomas

    josh thomas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Fort Bragg, NC
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick
    Found a set of trick flow twisted wedge heads..
    come with roller rockers 1.72
    arp head studs and bolts
    trick flow hardened pushrods

    Good idea???
     
  13. dirt racer

    dirt racer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    southern pines NC
    Vehicle:
    70 maverick
    reality check

    hey Josh these guys have been there before and are giving good sound advice! starting with a worn out engine could result in bearing failure when adding hp, im sure one or 2 have done it and it sux. A simple rebuild may add more hp than u might think. As for the compression of the engine this makes all the difference in choice of cam! Put a lil to big of a cam in a low comp motor and it will be slower than before spending money on cam intake dist rockers etc, you will be unsatisfied. Most of us have done that to often! So knowing this and what heads u have and how they flow are big factors in helping u out. So a head swap and higher comp pistons may be a starting point, having a strong base before spending money on other stuff would be better in the long run. The factory ford duraspark is what msd copied to make theirs, these guys are saying and i agree, other than looks their is no significant gain in hp for money spent on msd. Unless you are planning on dumping a ton of fuel and nitrous at your engine the factory duraspark is more than enough. The vacuum advance helps to make it more streetable(def. not cutting off at lights, non bucking acceleration, not getting fumigated at stoplights, etc) And the cool red msd cap snaps right on the factory dist adaptor. Simply these guys are trying to keep you from spending your hard earned dollars and not gettin what u expected. They are not trying to discourage you just help you start off in the right direction.
     
  14. my70mav

    my70mav Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    616
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Elk Grove,ca
    Vehicle:
    69.5 maverick

    these would be great if you had a solid bottom end and a cam. Odds are great that you have a hyraulic flat tappet cam already. Have you run a compression test on the engine you have now? does it smoke at all?

    The combo in my sig is pretty basic and ran very well in my mustang ( I havent driven the maverick,yet)
     
  15. josh thomas

    josh thomas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Fort Bragg, NC
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick
    No compression check, no smoke and sounds pretty good.

    With all thats been said i might start off with the short block and work my way up.
    I know I'll be doing nitrous in the future and I'd like to have some forged flat tops in there.

    Is there a place that sells rotating assemblies or complete 70's shortblocks that are pretty decent?
    I was thinking somewhere in the neihborhood of 10.5 : 1 compression. I'd like to throw a 125 wet plate kit in the mix after I get a 9" and at a miniumum have my C4 built or get an art carr or tci c4.
     

Share This Page