Ford Maverick / Mercury Comet Forums  

Mobile Tags Register Gallery
Go Back   Ford Maverick / Mercury Comet Forums > Maverick/Comet Forums > Technical

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2002-04-27, 06:43   #1
danzig
Novice
 
Join Date: 2002-04-27
Posts: 1
iTrader: 0 (0%)
Question 302/C6 Transmission Adapter Plate

I am installing a C-6 transmission on my 302. Do I need an adapter plate for my flex plate? Because my torque converter keeps getting pulled out by flex plate and eating the hell out of my front seal.

Thanks

-74 Maverick
302 w/ 289 heads
danzig is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 2002-04-27, 11:56   #2
Old Guy
Member
 
Join Date: 2002-03-09
Posts: 1,286
iTrader: 8 (100%)
Question

Just so we all get the info right, would you please tell us what the converter size and bolt pattern is. Also the number of teeth on the flex plate and any other details on what you had in there and what you have chgd. for the C6. This will help in determining your problem. Thanks
__________________
OLD GUY-Dave H.
Old Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2002-05-06, 22:48   #3
K. Merring
Regular
 
Join Date: 2002-03-09
Location: Easton,Pa.
Posts: 484
Vehicle(s): 73 Comet GT
iTrader: 0 (0%)
danzig, if your wanting to put a C6 into a Mav., it will be a hassle. Thet don't fit the transmission tunnel and firewall.
__________________
73 Comet GT, EFI
90 Lincoln LSC, super charged
86 Ranger
88 Bronco II

K. Merring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2002-05-06, 23:35   #4
littleredtoy
Seth

 
littleredtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2002-04-27
Location: North Carolina, Triangle Area
Posts: 4,023
Vehicle(s): '74 Comet GT
iTrader: 17 (100%)
Images: 27
Thumbs down Why a c-6

There is such a thing as a 'small block' C-6. I have seen them. I even owned one, didn't install it. From what I understand they were installed in some trucks, station wagons and Rancheros etc. behind 302's and maybe something else, I am not sure.

Most of the C-6's were mated to the larger FE and 385 series engines. FE's were the 332,352,360,361,390,391,406,410,427 and 428 engines. The 385 family was the 429, 429 Boss (no A/T according to my manuals) and 460 big blocks.

According to 'Mustang Monthly', (July 2000-page 22), the C-6 eats over 30 hp before sending the motion to the rear wheels.
Another transmission you may consider, I would recomend a well built C-4 or an AOD swap, is the FMX. Most mechanics hate it. It is said to be quirky, heavy (cast iron case vs. aluminum in C-4/C-6) and expensive to work on. I have however seen them behind several 351W's and some Clevelands I believe. They seemded to take some abuse.

By the way, the C-6 debuted in the 1967 Mustang. The C-4 name stands for the year it was designed. (c=1960's, 6=last number in the decade code).
littleredtoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2002-05-06, 23:37   #5
littleredtoy
Seth

 
littleredtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2002-04-27
Location: North Carolina, Triangle Area
Posts: 4,023
Vehicle(s): '74 Comet GT
iTrader: 17 (100%)
Images: 27
Red face Correction: ...the name C-6...

N/M
littleredtoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-04-08, 14:31   #6
mark_b
Member
 
mark_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2002-09-08
Location: western PA.
Posts: 186
Vehicle(s): 73 all original 302 2d red blk int. 72,302.2dr. green and 71 200ci. 2d green
iTrader: 0 (0%)
C-6 transmissions can be found in 1970's ford vans with 351w in them.

I converted from the stock AOD in my 85 E-150 van to a c-6 for durability and towing purposes.

Just a little info for the data base :-)

Mark
mark_b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-04-08, 17:37   #7
igo1090
Member
 
igo1090's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2004-01-30
Location: catonsville, md
Posts: 706
Vehicle(s): 75 maverick, 93 tbird tube car
iTrader: 0 (0%)
sounds like you have the wrong flexplate. converter should only pull forward a min of .100 inch and a maximum of .185 ( 3/16ths) inch. snout of converter must go into crank at least 1/8 inch if you decide to use washers to shim your setup (this can be a bitch to check on a ford trans unless you cut the bottom of the bellhousing away). best option is get the correct flexplate in it.

why use a c-6? they eat horsepower and weigh a lot more than a c-4. there should be no durability problems with a c-4. a friend of mine has a well-built one behind a 460 9 second car with no problems. a mildly prepped c-4 will hold up well behind most 302s.
__________________
dave shea
s/st 1818, h/r 1564, s/p 1018

Last edited by igo1090; 2004-04-08 at 17:40.
igo1090 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-04-08, 18:06   #8
mark_b
Member
 
mark_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2002-09-08
Location: western PA.
Posts: 186
Vehicle(s): 73 all original 302 2d red blk int. 72,302.2dr. green and 71 200ci. 2d green
iTrader: 0 (0%)
What is the horse power loss comparision from the C-4 to the
C-6?

Mark
mark_b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-04-09, 10:58   #9
igo1090
Member
 
igo1090's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2004-01-30
Location: catonsville, md
Posts: 706
Vehicle(s): 75 maverick, 93 tbird tube car
iTrader: 0 (0%)
an old article i have says c6 eats 50 hp and c4 25hp. there is also a weight penalty for using the c6. the bottom line is that a car will be quicker with a c4 than a c6. if doing a lot of towing or running a heavy car/truck, then c6 is worth it for the durability. i know guys running 9 second big block cars having no problem with c4s as far as durability and performance.
__________________
dave shea
s/st 1818, h/r 1564, s/p 1018
igo1090 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-04-09, 18:31   #10
mavman
Member
 
mavman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 2002-03-09
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,969
Vehicle(s): '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
iTrader: 2 (100%)
Images: 2
There is another website that I have frequented that has a member that runs a 4000+ lb Galaxie with a 557 stroker deep in the 9's with a C4. They're plenty strong, no need for a C6 in a relatively light maverick. Not to say a C6 is a crappy trans...they're darned near bulletproof (unless you're my brother), just heavy and they eat up a LOT of HP. Expect .3-.4 sec. ET improvement switching to a C4.
mavman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Interested in this thread?
Receive email updates and post your own response by registering today, it's free!

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
transmission maintenance questions Maliclips Technical 9 2007-11-06 08:40
transmission pan from other cars duster70 Parts Interchange 7 2006-03-27 22:39
Fuel pump /oil cooler adapter problem solved Graybeard Parts Interchange 4 2006-03-11 19:30
C4 transmission help EFIMAV Technical 6 2005-10-03 18:23
Manual Transmission DanielRoush Technical 4 2004-06-14 13:48


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:51.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.