400 Sbf

Discussion in 'Technical' started by maverick75, Sep 3, 2008.

  1. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,017
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    can it fit w/o a MII type suspension?


    does it use the same frame mounts as a windsor?

    can it use 351C headers?

    has anyone use this engine in a mav/comet before?

    i've seen a mock-up pic but i don't think the owner ever ran the engine.

    does anyone know a good cleveland forum?
     
  2. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,017
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    i met a ford guy down the street that has a65 truck with a lincoln 460/c6 drivetrain...and he has a couple of spare 460 and c6's and he has a rebuilt 400/c6 . that he can sell me and help put into the mav...but i know its not a drop in in the lime green400 pic it looks like it only has 3/8 clerance to the shock towers.

    but it would be awesome having a 400 in a Mav.
     
  3. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    The 400 is a taller - and therefore wider engine than the 351C. It is wider than the 351W and every bit as tall. You can get the engine in the Maverick / Comet without a MII suspension or even shaving the shock towers but to get at the plugs to do a tune up you will have to remove the engine to get to them. Shaving the towers is for clearance at the plugs - so they can be more easily changed (it is still not EASY).
    I agree that the 400, with the proper mods, (it is a smog motor with low compression) would be a great source of power but there are probably easier ways to get power into the Maverick / Comet engine compartment.
     
  4. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    The 400 is big and heavy.
    It uses different mounts than 302/351w/351c.

    You will have to fab up your engine mounts.
    I have seen the pic with the lime green 400 setting between the towers.
    I have serious doubts it will work. It fit without any sort of exhaust, and no room to put an exhaust. Even with shaved towers, they don't shave down to the level of the exhaust anyway. So no help there.

    I believe myself, to do it right, you need to M2 the front end.
    In that case, I would just throw in a 460. You can make 408 cubes out of a 351w, or 351c for that matter. That way you have a 400+ that fits, is light, and you can get parts for. Not to mention mount up with 302 parts.
     
  5. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,017
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    ok thanks...i'll stay in the windsor family...for now=)
     
  6. PINKY

    PINKY .....John Ford.....

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    9,875
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Louisville, Ky.
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick
    you can always just get 400 c.i. out of a W's :burnout:
     
  7. curtisc

    curtisc Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Location:
    Moscow...... Ks
    Vehicle:
    1978 F-150, 1971 Maverick, 79 Bronco
    i wouldn't mess with a 400m myself. i have worked on the one in the family ranchero, not a great motor for the size/weight/cost to make power. a truck 460 isn't much bigger and has lots more torque/hp capacity. i think the mounts are very simmilar :huh:
     
  8. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    ya, dont waste all that time and effore to put a boat anchor under the hood

    i like the sound of the 460 tho :)
     
  9. gulupo

    gulupo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    nuevo laredo,Monterrey mexico, Laredo Tx
    Vehicle:
    1970 ford maverick
    i had an seventies LTD with the 400m... lots of torque, tires spinned like hell. heres a link to build a 380 rear wheel HP for 2000 bucks...

    http://www.geocities.com/styleline58/400.html

    but to put it in a maverick..seems like a lot of headechs and frustations...but interesting...
     
  10. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    The 400 was never a boat anchor, that title was assigned to the destroked 400----the 351M. The 400 CAN be built to produce awesome hp/tq, but requires more money and machinework to do so. I've tried a test fit of a 400 in a 67 Stang, It did fit between the towers, but there was no room for plug access nor any kind of exhaust. And as Dave said, requires custom motor mounts. The transmission pattern for most is different from the other small blocks too, unless you find the rare small block patterned 400.
     
  11. dkstuck

    dkstuck Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2004
    Messages:
    3,249
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Location:
    Latrobe Pa (Pgh)
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick in drag
    he he I got one of the small pattern 400's Comes out of 73 LTD. They are gaining ground with power and parts are easier to find! Still,,, too much fab'in to stick in Mavericks
     
  12. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    The big drawback is finding pistons that come up far enough to give a zero deck. All the stock pistons are .060-.080 (at least) of the deck at TDC. And the open chambered heads suck as far as detonation resistence. I've built a hot 400. Cost me about $2500 6-7 years ago. Used a set of forged 351C pistons (but these were still .050 short of the deck) Ran great, but wanted nothing but pump premium for fuel with a 9.7 to 1 comp ratio. My 10.25 to 1 390 would digest 89 octane and put out the same power.
     
  13. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    That is due to open chamber heads.
    Did you run open chambers?
    351c engines have this issue with open chamber 2v or 4v heads.
    Anything over 9:1 wants premium.
    Closed chamber Cleveland heads can go over 11:1 on premium.
     
  14. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    Yea, it had ported, polished & milled 2 bbl heads. Wouldn't have been any different with quench heads with the pistons .060 down the hole at TDC. I milled the block .010 and the heads .030 to get them this close. Still no cigar. Like I said they're good engines, it just takes more money and machinework to get rid of the pinging problems with em than other engine families
     
  15. dkstuck

    dkstuck Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2004
    Messages:
    3,249
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Location:
    Latrobe Pa (Pgh)
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick in drag
    http://www.tmeyerinc.com/ affordable pistons

    All you need for a good 400 build. I bought the 396 hp 400 he project built an love it! Aussie heads really wake that an cleveland engines up.
     

Share This Page