Air cleaner

Discussion in 'Drag Racing' started by mcknight77, Mar 26, 2016.

  1. mcknight77

    mcknight77 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    Boise, ID
    Vehicle:
    74 Mav drag car, 1970 Maverick, 1971 Bronco, 66 Nova, 67 Ranchero
    I'm running a Victor Junior on the 5.0 and haven't found an air cleaner that I can close the hood on. 14" drop base interferes with the distributor. 10" clears the distributor but is too tall, and I'm concerned about how it will flow. I've got an Edelbrock Pro-Flow triangular now. The hood closes, but is tight down on the air cleaner and looks like it will restrict flow.

    I know a hood scoop is warranted but I don't want to cut the factory hood and can't afford a fiberglass hood.

    Any ideas?
     
  2. mcknight77

    mcknight77 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    Boise, ID
    Vehicle:
    74 Mav drag car, 1970 Maverick, 1971 Bronco, 66 Nova, 67 Ranchero
    Solved it myself. Going to put a scoop on it.
     
  3. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    Good for you. Gotta pay if you wanna play. Taller inductions make more power and look cooler too. (y)
     
  4. dan gregory

    dan gregory Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    835
    Likes Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    chesapeake va
    Vehicle:
    1970 maverick
    You are right Rob,it`s funny,how many times have you seen a guy with a very restrictive air cleaner & a powerful eng. & he does`nt understand why it will not perform.I am not sure about your area,but over here in Late Model Stock circle track all you can run is a 350cfm holley 2 barrel.You know better than I because of the amount of time you have spent around circle track,that carb. will do more to police that class than probably anything else nascar could have come up with.
     
  5. rotorr22

    rotorr22 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,302
    Likes Received:
    259
    Trophy Points:
    211
    Location:
    Columbiana, Ohio
    Vehicle:
    2018 F150 XLT/5.0, 2014 Focus 5 spd manual,1974 Maverick Grabber, 1986 Thunderbird Elan 5.0/AOD
    Are you running a carb spacer of any kind?
     
  6. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    I know we have tighter engine quarters in these cars.. and no offense to anyone who actually likes those foam filters.. but they leave something to be desired for an air filter. They will cost you power even on more moderately powered(airflow) motors.

    The last one I used(not too long after they came out) was actually sucking/caving in around the lack of inner wire bracing. You could even see it sucking in while revving the motor at the carb linkage. And to make matters worse, after a bit of racing around I found that the filter started holding that sucked in shape and even had dirt tracking in several places where the filter media was allowing the unfiltered air to sneak by. And the 1000 cfm rating is just as much a joke as that $79 buck 1,000 watt amplifier at walmart is. Got rid of it and put a 3" x 14" K&N filter setup which then allowed me to jet up the carb with all the newfound airflow I never even knew I was missing. Foam is for lawn equipment or pre-filters for off-road racing. Lesson learned.
     
    mojo likes this.
  7. away

    away Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Harrodsburg Kentucky
    Vehicle:
    1972
    No air cleaner needed in an drag racing thread lol!!!!
     
  8. mcknight77

    mcknight77 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    Boise, ID
    Vehicle:
    74 Mav drag car, 1970 Maverick, 1971 Bronco, 66 Nova, 67 Ranchero
    Down the strip I agree. However, in the pits there is a lot of dirt and sand blowing around. I don't want it in the engine.
     
  9. mcknight77

    mcknight77 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    Boise, ID
    Vehicle:
    74 Mav drag car, 1970 Maverick, 1971 Bronco, 66 Nova, 67 Ranchero
    For me to run a 14x3 filter I'd have to run without a hood.
     
  10. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    I have no doubt. I usually try to be 5 steps ahead with this kinda stuff but still not sure what I'll be able to run on mine . Hoping once the motor is down and back a tad it may free up some additional room. I always prefer the bigger caps, especially with the higher base timing I like to run, but now thinking that a low profile disty may be the minimum needed to help matters a bit more there.

    The above mention was basically only in reference to the poor flow capability of foam compared to the more conventional filtration media. Glad you got it sorted out and look forward to seeing your finished product on the track.
     
  11. mcknight77

    mcknight77 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    102
    Location:
    Boise, ID
    Vehicle:
    74 Mav drag car, 1970 Maverick, 1971 Bronco, 66 Nova, 67 Ranchero
    I agree, a 14x3 is the ideal. Right now I will run the Proflow foam until I go to a fiberglass hood with scoop. I cut the hood to run a low profile scoop off of a 2006 Mustang. It was painted last night and I should get it installed today.

    By the way I fired it up. Haven't driven it yet.
     
  12. mav man

    mav man Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    92
    Trophy Points:
    122
    Location:
    wi
    Vehicle:
    70mav
    I think I have a 14x2 inch air cleaner, it clears good it worked on my Mav and comet.
     
  13. tbirdz12

    tbirdz12 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    117
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Sun Lakes, Az
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Mav
    I ran a Vic Jr with a 1" carb spacer and a 1.5" drop base and cleared with no issues using a 14 x 3 K&N filter and Extreme top.
     
  14. Rick

    Rick G8I operations

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    122
    Location:
    Ocala, Florida
    Vehicle:
    71 Maverick
    Anything less then 3" above the carb is hurting you. Another option would be remove the Vic Jr for a smaller intake to create velocity but I think the best option is a 4" Cowl induction hood. Think about the whole package.
     
  15. mav man

    mav man Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    92
    Trophy Points:
    122
    Location:
    wi
    Vehicle:
    70mav
    Along with the 14x2 inch it has a k &n top on it . I don't see how that's hurting that much? I would think It should breath just fine ID much rather have that then having to go with a cowl hood.
     

Share This Page