More Cylinder Heads Questions

Discussion in 'Technical' started by 73Mav, Jul 9, 2002.

  1. 73Mav

    73Mav New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Vehicle:
    73 Maverick
    Thanks everyone for the input on the GT40P heads thread. I think I have decided on the E7TE heads. Now the first problem is where to find some. I have been told that they are the most economical solution for a power upgrade, but they seem to be getting rare. What vehicles/years were they standard on? I know they will flow better that the stock heads I have, but will I gain much from going to larger valves without porting and polishing, or would I need to do that too?

    Also, will my stock 73 Maverick exhaust manifold work with the E7's or will I have to make modifications, i.e. hedders? I am planning on changing to a 4 bbl carbuerator and intake manifold, but I don't want to have to make a lot of changes to the car required (I think?) if I change to hedders. I have power steering and the shifter on the column, both of which I understand have to be relocated to add hedders.

    Thanks for the help. I am trying to get an idea of how far I need to go before jumping into the rebuild.
     
  2. EFIMAV

    EFIMAV Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Davenport Iowa
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick, FRPP 5.0, AOD, 3.80 equaloc
    heads

    Sorry 73 mav, I indicated that I have a set of heads for sale in the other post but for some reason I adressed it to Jeremy. If you are interested you can email me at wm12345@hotmail.com. See the post from before for a description. I thought I would try the board before going to ebay! Thanks
     
  3. CometGT1974

    CometGT1974 Gearhead

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,583
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    117
    Location:
    Western NC
    Vehicle:
    74 Comet GT
    stock FI heads

    I have a set of stock heads off of a 90 mustang....the heads were removed when the motor had approx. 80,000 miles on it. They have been sitting in my garage ever since....I keep them covered with WD-40 so there's no rust.....I also have a set of 1.72 rockers for them.....let me know if you are interested....

    smoore53@charter.net
     
  4. Old Guy

    Old Guy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,291
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Engine and Head Upgrade

    The posts from you that I read indicate you would like to keep your car very streetable and yet have a little more HP to play with at the stop lights etc. The biggest restrictor on small block Fords are the cyl. heads, your choice to install the E7's will probably help a lot but to use stock manifolds and existing carb set up is a waste of time for the money spent on the heads. In my experiance, I purchased a set of 60cc iron heads and had them rebuilt with 1.94 valves and screw in studs with guide plates. Total bill was near 850.00. They performed well for over seven years now with one valve job done a couple years back. But when you price the aftermarket ones available, iron or aluminum, the cost of mine seven yrs back is about the same and you are getting a better flowing head which is brand new with some warranty. Have been where you are now and learned that adding one thing to and engine and not matching a corrosponding item(headers, intake, carb, etc.) is kind of a futile attempt and lots of spent money for negative power results.

    My opinion is to go ahead with your rebuild and maybe spend the extra bucks for the E7's or even early 351W's. Performer RPM manifold and some sort of carb(Edelbrock 600 for out of the box improvement) or a Holley if you desire. While you are rebuilding should look at a little better cam to work with the heads etc. The shorty Mustang headers will help and eliminate some clearance problems, but the inexspensive Hedman long tube ones are a real boost for torque etc. Assuming you are running a C4, rebuild it and put in a shift kit, after all this is done a torque convertor to match the rest of your components is in order. Lastly get a lower rear end gear and traction bars of some sorts. I know this all sounds like a lot to change and pricey but over a period of time you will see that doing it all right the first time around is actually cheaper in the long run. Or", for fun and little money, heads, manifold and four barrell carb with a 4:11 rear end will surprise the hell out of a bunch of other cars at the stop lights too. As the old saying go's it takes money to go fast. But you can get a real nice street sleeper for just a few bucks also, if the combinations are right.
     
  5. EFIMAV

    EFIMAV Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Davenport Iowa
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick, FRPP 5.0, AOD, 3.80 equaloc
    E7 head change on 73 motor

    Old Guy, or anyone for that matter. Didn't ford dish the piston in 1973 to decrease the compression? Therefore, the head chamber volume is around 60ccs for the 73 heads. I know for a fact that the E7 heads have 64-66cc chambers designed to be used with flat top pistons. If you put those heads on the 73 block you will lower an already low CR. Do I have this correct?
     
  6. Charlie

    Charlie maverick.to/grabber

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick Grabber (Modified)
    64cc? I don't think they were that big. I personally cc'd my E7TE heads and they are 58.5 cc. Yes they have been milled a couple times, but it was just to flatten them not just for compression. Milling is always an option if that is in fact the case.
     
  7. 73Mav

    73Mav New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Vehicle:
    73 Maverick
    Old Guy,

    Thanks for the suggestions. I was already planning on doing some of what you suggested: change intake and carb, new cam, and as the thread suggests change the heads. I would like to do it all now, but money and time preclude that. I bought this car in non-running condition, needing a valve job, about a year ago. I decided to rebuild the engine for the experince and to give it more power. Now I have the engine out, and am trying to decide on all the upgrades. I didn't realize how many options/consequences would be involved in choosing new heads. I knew the cam change would be called for, but all the other variables that depend on what heads I choose (which headers if any, what pistons to use, rockers, etc.) seem to have me running in circles.

    I have recently started considering rebuilding the C4 as you recommend. This, like the rest of the task of rebuilding the engine, is going to be a new one for me. I was thinking of getting the high performance C4 rebuild kit from JC Whitney while I the block is off getting machined. Is this what you would recommend? How difficult is it to rebuild this transmission?

    Thanks,
    73Mav
     
  8. Old Guy

    Old Guy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,291
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Rebuild Answers

    First I want to say that what you are doing is a very fine thing in my book. Wanting to learn as you work on this project is sometimes a rarity these days, some buy there cars ready built and some have the work done by someone else. This is not all bad for some idividuals but of course in my day(1950's on up) we had to learn by doing just to keep those old lead sleds running from day to day. Again, stand proud as you finish each segment of your project, you will deserve it.

    The C4 is probably one of the easiest of trannys to rebuild and a good learning tool for automatics. My first suggestion is to get hold of good Ford C4 rebuild book like a Haynes or Chiltons, read the basic principals of the workings of the transmission and then make sure you have the right tools on hand to do the job. As you take it apart lay everything out on some surface or bench in the order you remove it. Follow the directions in the book and keep small parts together. Snap ring pliers and a dial indicator are required as is a press or some c clamp vise grips to compress the clutch piston spring etc. This will all be shown in the manual.

    For lack of space in this post I can't go through the whole procedure but the manual will show you how. An automatic trans is nothing but a large hydraulic pump that puts fluid through various valves etc. to engage and disengage clutches and gears to drive an output shaft to turn the rear wheels. I am no professional trans guy but have done many types for racing and my own daily drivers. As far as the high performance rebuild kit, save your money, get a regular kit at the trans parts shop and it will work fine in your HP range etc. A good shift kit in the valve body will be of great help, I get the master kits from the supplier for less than 50.00 and after you have done that part , if you will email me I can tell you how to put a shift kit in your valve body for less than a McDonalds burger. If you have a local scrap yard, not a salvage yard, near you, look around it for C4's. I find them all the time and can buy them for 12 to 20.00 for parts. Have run C4's on several 400-450HP race cars and never used any high dollar race parts in them(never trashed any of them other than a normal clutch wear over time). Very underated trans. to say the least, while your at it be sure and include a "Good" trans cooler to add on when your done.

    Any info needed just ask.
     
  9. EFIMAV

    EFIMAV Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Davenport Iowa
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick, FRPP 5.0, AOD, 3.80 equaloc
    Charlie, lets get to the bottom of this

    I think this is an important issue for those looking at upgrading their old 302s with newer heads. When I compared the E7TEs that I have to the 58cc heads from a 68 there is a very distinct difference in the combustion chamber size. Also when comparing the E7TEs to the 69cc heads on a lnicoln 302 I could see some difference. The mustang pistons are basically flat tops with valve reliefs. They come up pretty close to the deck. With a 58cc head the compression would be more like 10.5:1 wouldn't it. The mustangs are 9.5:1 implying either a different piston or head. I have one printed source that indicates the E7TEs are 64-66 but it is off of the internet and who knows how accurate it really is! Charlie, I know you have a lot of good source material so can you find some reliable published info on this? Thanks, Ward
     
  10. Thack

    Thack vision advicator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Moreno Valley Ca
    Vehicle:
    71 2 Dr Maverick, 70 Mustang Sportsroof, 77 F100 4x4, 72 maverick grabber wifes
    Here's the info I have from How To Rebuild a Small Block Ford
    71-74 heads with casting numbers
    D1TZ-A D2OE-BA have 58.2 cc chambers

    Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference and Performance Handbook has the E7TE-PA at 60.6-63.6 and during the production run ford revised its chamber volume specs from 59.0-63.6 to 60.6-63.6.

    So if you had a compression ratio of 8.0 to 1 with the head change you would have 7.6 to 1 not to dramatic and just right for a supercharger
     
  11. K. Merring

    K. Merring Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    484
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Easton,Pa.
    Vehicle:
    73 Comet GT
    NOTE: The 73 block has a higher deck. When using flat top pistons you may have to have the block decked to get the pistons up to deck height. Then the e7 heads will get over 9:1 cr.
    For hot street use, look at using an RV cam, 600 vacuum sec. 4 barrel carb, headers and a posi rear (you will need it). You end up with a stump puller under your foot.
     
  12. 73Mav

    73Mav New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Vehicle:
    73 Maverick
    Thanks for the info guys. K. Merring, do you know how much higher the deck was in 73? Was this true of Mustang 302's that year also, or did they just not machine off as much of the casting on the tamer 302's. Wouldn't having a different deck height on the block screw up geometries for heads and intake manifolds?

    What is the general opinion on hardened valve seats? I was talking to someone at a local machine shop and he told me that hardened seats are just a way around the problem of burned up seats. He recommended fixing it by changing out the thermostat and running the engine 20 degrees or so hotter and making sure not to be running to lean to ensure better vaporization and more complete burn. This sounds reasonabe, but I have been told (mainly by drivers- not machinists) that hardened seats are the way to go.

    Thanks.
     
  13. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    Hardened seats are designed to take the abuse of having no lead (lubricant) on the valves and seats. I have run engines both ways, with seats installed, and without, and havent really seen any problems yet. I'm still running a 302 in one of our street cars that doesnt have them installed, they're just stock heads. I've had to "adjust" the valves occasionally, but I think that's because of the rigged posi-locks coming loose on occasion. The hard seats that you're talking about are pretty expensive to install. They cost about $10 each (you'll need 8, only needed on exhaust valves), and they're a riteous PITA to cut a seat on. A good machinest can do it quite easily, but he has to have the experience of doing it before. If done right, you cant tell they're there. I put my first hard seat in an old 305 GM head, and even with a good TCM-25 seat & guide machine, it still wasnt easy. After the first few, it got easier, but it takes practice. I just finished a 351w head not long ago, and after the 5 angle valve job, you cant even see the insert in the head. Bottom line, it's really up to you, if you want to take the gamble and go without them, go for it. If it was me, I would just break down and have them put it, if nothing else, it's good insurance.
     
  14. K. Merring

    K. Merring Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    484
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Easton,Pa.
    Vehicle:
    73 Comet GT
    The area is called 'deck clearence height'. On all 73 302 engines it will be .032" with a small tolerence. This was one of the ways the factory adjusted compression.
    I to, will tell you to put hard seats in. I did not and used fuel additive to prevent the seat erosion and it didnot work. Heads lasted less than 8000 miles, then had the seats put in. The heads are extensivly ported and set up with big valves.
    Aftermarket heads are the way to go for more power.
    As for valve train geomertry, I have screw-in studs, push rod guide plates, Roberts push rods and roller tip rockers. I made a push rod length checking tool and ordered the length I needed to allow the roller tips to run on the center 1/3 of the valve tips. This was all done because of the cam lift change, block deck etc. so everything would work out. It depends on what combination of parts are used. So it doesnot always have to be done that way. Mock up the valve train and with a light spring under the valve and check out how it looks if your not sure, with other than all stock parts. The 69-77 push rod length are 6.905", 77-78 are 6.883" and are supposed to be available in +/- .060 lengths. Just make sure the rocker arms don't slide off the edge of the valve tips.
    On intake manifold matching, the bolts get a little tight and watch the gasket clearence on each end. I think the intakes were machined a little more or less to match the deck heights, at the factory. The 73-76 blocks are a PIA in this respect.
     

Share This Page