Retaining Z-Bar with late model 5.0

Discussion in 'Technical' started by yellowgrabber, Feb 15, 2010.

  1. yellowgrabber

    yellowgrabber Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    40
    Location:
    Camano Island, WA
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick Grabber, 61 Falcon Futura V8 363ci Dart Block, 62 Falcon V8 289ci toploader
    I'm currently considering swapping out my original 72 vintage 302 with a late model 5.0. Since the original Z-Bar linkage seems to be working fine, I would like to retain it.

    BUT... The late model blocks do not have the threaded boss in the block for the engine side Z-Bar metal ball pivot. I have seen references to fabricate your own adapter as well as references to companies that sold adapters. Unfortunately, the references were a little dated and I have not found anything current.

    The attached picture is about all I have been able to find. It would mount with the bellhousing bolts and presumably locate the ball in the original position.

    Anyone that can point me in the right direction would be appreciated.

    Also, as an alternative I would appreciate recommendations and would like to hear what experience other members have had with hydraulic conversions.

    Thanks
     

    Attached Files:

  2. FordsForever

    FordsForever Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Location:
    santa clara, ca
    Vehicle:
    74 mav
    That's the adapter that most Mustang vendors sell. Fits just fine and will let you retain your stock z-bar.

    CJ Pony, Mustang Plus, Tony Branda, Mustangs Unlimited and possibly AutoKrafters to name a few.

    R

    Attached pic shows it mounted on a Lakewood type scattershield. The spacers not needed when mounting on a stock aluminum bellhousing.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Feb 18, 2010
  3. rayzorsharp

    rayzorsharp I "AM" a Maverick!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    11,256
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    298
    Location:
    Grand Bay, Alabama
    Vehicle:
    Three 71 Maverick Grabbers, a 72 302 Sprint, a 73 LDO 2door parts car, a 76 silver v8 Stallion.
    I'm having to use the same adaptor. I don't really like it but what ya gonna do? It does work.
     
  4. MNTony

    MNTony aka Godzirra

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,026
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Surprise, AZ
    Vehicle:
    72 Turbo FI Maverick, 2006 GMC Sierra Duramax 4x4, 2014 Ford Mustang GT 4spd
    I would avoid the juice throwout bearings. I had one in my previous car and absolutely hated it. All that I can compare it to is power vs. manual steering. I like the feel of a mechanical linkage (it gives you more response and personally more feedback) and the hydraulic just felt mushy to me. But ultimately it is what you prefer. Drive a small foreign car with a hydraulic and you will get the idea.
     
  5. yellowgrabber

    yellowgrabber Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    40
    Location:
    Camano Island, WA
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick Grabber, 61 Falcon Futura V8 363ci Dart Block, 62 Falcon V8 289ci toploader
    Thanks... I understand your point. Hyd seems to be more "on / off" than a progressive feel.

    Have you had any experience with a master/slave cylinder setup?

    Thanks to all for the info.
     
  6. MNTony

    MNTony aka Godzirra

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,026
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Surprise, AZ
    Vehicle:
    72 Turbo FI Maverick, 2006 GMC Sierra Duramax 4x4, 2014 Ford Mustang GT 4spd
    No, I can't say that I've tried the master slave setup. I had the McLeod hydraulic throwout bearing setup with a Tilton cylinder in my old Mustang.
     
  7. Mercury-beast

    Mercury-beast Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    cali
    Vehicle:
    1975 ford maverick in process of having a 89 roller
    is this something needed to put a 89 5.0 H.o in a 75 merc comet? with power steering
     
  8. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,822
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    I'm using the same adaptor bracket but the flange on my Lakewood bellhousing is 1/2" thinner than on a stock bell so I had to move the pivot ball rearward 1/2".
     
  9. FordsForever

    FordsForever Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Location:
    santa clara, ca
    Vehicle:
    74 mav
    Why move the pivot? See the pic in the previous post. Just add spacers between the adapter and the lakewood bellhousing and you get the same location. It's a very simple fix. Of course what ever works. :hmmm:

    R
     
  10. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,822
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    At the time I tried using a spacer but something interferred, might have been a header tube. Just too long ago and the memory ain't what it used to be.
     
  11. FordsForever

    FordsForever Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Location:
    santa clara, ca
    Vehicle:
    74 mav
    The reason for the adapter is because ford eliminated the casting on the block where the pivot used to be installed. Has nothing to do with power steering or not. PS has it's own problems.

    RS
     

Share This Page