Sportsman connecting rod choice

Discussion in 'Drag Racing' started by Maverocket, Dec 23, 2013.

  1. Maverocket

    Maverocket Bob Williams

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,120
    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Northwest
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Mav, 62 F100 unibody
    My street/strip 302 is morphing into a full drag setup this season. What is the best budget minded rod for an 8,000RPM, 500HP 302? My current stock, polished and shot peened rods are my weakest link. I was looking at the Scat or Eagle I beams.
     
  2. Cruzin Illusion

    Cruzin Illusion Enigma

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Location:
    Commerce City, Colorado
    Vehicle:
    1972 Grabber
    Scat all the way!!!
     
  3. Mad Goon

    Mad Goon Scaring the Hondas

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,058
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    147
    Location:
    Redondo Beach, California
    Vehicle:
    71 Comet 4dr(SOLD), 2016 Mustang GT Premium
    At 8000 you might look torward the ARP2000 upgrade on the Scats. Better for the high-RPM fun.
     
  4. franktf

    franktf Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,119
    Likes Received:
    336
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Pinellas Park, FL
    Vehicle:
    72 Mercury Comet
    Definitely Scat, if you going to turn 8000 I would do H-Beams with the ARP2000 bolt upgrade.....
     
  5. Boss302maverick

    Boss302maverick Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    35
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Vehicle:
    1971 maverick grabber
    I run the eagle H beam with the ARP2000 bolts, I make around 540 hp and turn 8600rpm, the scats and eagles are both china rods. whatever rod you use, make sure you have the big ends checked, it seems that sometimes when they install the 2000 bolts, they take the others out and just put the 2000s in, the problem is they are a higher torque and distort the hole, it is a common problem that gets over looked.

    Duane
     
  6. John Holden

    John Holden Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    NJ
    At 8,000 and 500 horsepower if you don't have an aftermarket block that's your next weak link.
     
  7. Maxx Levell

    Maxx Levell Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    107
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Henderson, KY
    Vehicle:
    1972 Mav 2 dr, 1971 Mav 2 dr...thanks Old Guy!
    ^^^^^^ this^^^^^^ But PROBE Sportsman Racing Series pistons with ARP upgraded bolts have held up for me pretty well.
     
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2013
  8. Maverocket

    Maverocket Bob Williams

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,120
    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Northwest
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Mav, 62 F100 unibody
    Thanks guys for all of your input. The true HP and RPM will more than likely end up a little less, but I'd rather guess over than under. So it's looking like Scat I beam or Eagle H beam with upgraded bolts. I would like to keep the rotating assembly as light as possible with the stock block.
     
  9. John Holden

    John Holden Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    NJ
    Out of curiosity what top end do you have to support the RPM?
     
  10. Boss302maverick

    Boss302maverick Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    35
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Vehicle:
    1971 maverick grabber
    I think you are right at the edge with a stock 2 bolt block at 500hp and 8000 rpm, I think 450hp is fine, if you think you are gonna be just under 500hp, I would suggest a main stud girdle, I ran the DSS one on mine for a while, but once I went to the roller and went to 8500, I upgraded to an a4 block. but if you line hone the mains, and use the main stud girdle, I think you will be ok.

    Duane
     
  11. Maverocket

    Maverocket Bob Williams

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,120
    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Northwest
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Mav, 62 F100 unibody
    I'm running reworked Canfields with a Parker intake. Also have ARP main studs with a girdle. The lifter bores are bushed and centered.
     
  12. Boss302maverick

    Boss302maverick Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    35
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Vehicle:
    1971 maverick grabber
    sounds like you gotta pretty good handle on it
     
  13. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    in order to make those cheaper i-beam rods work at that power level.. and more importantly.. this rpm level.. you need to have the lightest pistons you can posssbly afford. In this situation, I would even opt for thinner/lighter ring packages(less drag too) combined with shorter pins(lighter piston designs will already have shorter pins) and pay the extra money for tapered/or thinner wrist pins too. The h-beams will be much heavier, add slightly to the windage losses(especially at this rpm level), but give far greater stength margins without the need to spend as much on lightning up the piston package to keep the rod alive.

    I actually prefer a really light i-beam at more moderate power levels like this because there is some extra power to be had with their benefits.. but you must spend more money to lighten things up for the sake of longevity at higher rpm.

    And.. Boss302 knows his stuff in regards to not trusting these cheaper rods. Many horror stories and I've had a few sets out of spec straight out of the box. Also keep in mind that some aftermarket suppliers will order/stock the cheaper bolt'd version and just install their own bolt upgrades to make some extra cash on their parts purchases. The rods should ALWAYS be machined with the actual bolts being used.
     
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2014
  14. Maverocket

    Maverocket Bob Williams

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,120
    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Northwest
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Mav, 62 F100 unibody
    Thanks for your input guys, looks like I will be going with the Scat I beams and the ARP 2000 bolts. I'm confident my machinist will make em right, he's a perfectionist.
     
  15. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    No problem. I've used several sets for mine and others builds in the past few years and they are decent for the cash as long as you make damned sure they're right on spec' and better matched to the combo before hanging the pistons off of em'.

    And just so you know.. I was dead serious about lightning things up to make those rods live. Reason I say this again is because.. IIRC.. they are only rated to around 500 horse @ 7,500 rpm.

    The nice thing about the little Fords is that the rod ratio(more importantly.. the rod angle) is more livable for lessor quality rods like these and lighter assemblies add even greater strength margin in the long run.

    The last really nice set of similar budget rods(Eagle SIR's with 3/8 inch ARP L19 series capscrews) I did up was for my Blazers 383 motor freshening and that thing pushes just over 500 horse at right about 6,800 rpm these days. But that's the detuned version of this motor from it's original solid roller configuration of 563 horse at around 7,150rpm before I detuned it to go back onto the street with it. I've pushed that thing past 7,600 several times(typical shift points of 7,400) when it had 4.10's gears in it and even touched above 8,600 once when I missed a manual shift for my 700r4 and found out real quick that my rev limiter chip had been inadvertantly left out of my ignition module. Luckily I didn't slap any valves that time. :oops:

    To give perspective here.. my Chev's 6" rods finished total weight after some serious grinding and meticulous sculpting was about 517 grams and swung pistons(including the optional .090 thin walled 2.5" pins) weighing around 499 grams. I also hunted around to find a shop that still did shotpeen work(tougher than you think these days) and had them done twice to help harden the newly ground and poilshed surface back up to spec again. Your 5.090 rod lengths should be fairly light to begin with.. but there's still some uneccesary meat that can be removed from the beams to lighten things up without reducing the shoulder/big end/pin end strength.

    Piston weight will still be fairly important with that rod choice though and without a really light design being used to reduce G's on that rod?.. you may even consider moving to another mfgrs choice with their larger 7/16 bolt offering. Or.. adding some upgraded L19's at only slight price increase over the ARP 2000's would be the least I would do here.

    Not everyone can afford Crower or Oliver rods and it's still good bang for the buck as long as you make sure it'll live without failure. Good luck with it. (y)
     

Share This Page