C4 Rebuild Kits

Discussion in 'Transmissions' started by Ethan, Apr 7, 2022.

  1. Ethan

    Ethan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2018
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Location:
    Springfield, MO
    Vehicle:
    1975 Ford Maverick, 2 dr
    Hello all, I have a quick question regarding a C4 rebuild. I have a '75 Maverick that had a 250 I6 until I blew a rod through the oil pan. I found a donor 302 from a 1992 pickup, and I am going to install the engine when I get back home from college. From what I understand, the 250 tranny will work just fine with the 302, as they used the same size bellhousing. Do any of you have suggestions regarding what kit I should get? I am not looking for a performance kit, but I still want the tranny to last as long as possible. Thanks in advance.
     
  2. greasemonkey

    greasemonkey Burnin corn

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,401
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Sedalia,MO
    Vehicle:
    1973 ford maverick Grabber,2017 dodge ram,88t-bird,indian scout,Indian Chieftain.95 Mustang GT
    Iv had good luck with Trans-Go kits in the past but it's been awhile.
     
  3. Ethan

    Ethan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2018
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Location:
    Springfield, MO
    Vehicle:
    1975 Ford Maverick, 2 dr
    Thanks, I'll look into those.
     
  4. gregmaverick

    gregmaverick Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    429
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Location:
    Salem, OR
    Vehicle:
    1970 maverick
    I've used the TransGo kit twice. :thumbs2:
     
  5. jasonwthompson

    jasonwthompson Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,330
    Likes Received:
    457
    Trophy Points:
    196
    Location:
    Carrollton TX
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    TransGo for sure.
     
  6. Ethan

    Ethan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2018
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Location:
    Springfield, MO
    Vehicle:
    1975 Ford Maverick, 2 dr
    Looked into the Transgo kits. It appears that they currently only offer valve body reprogramming kits, instead of the master kits like those from B&M or Alto. Any success with those kits? They are about $250 - $350 each, so I want to make sure that others have not had major problems with them.
     
  7. gregmaverick

    gregmaverick Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    429
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Location:
    Salem, OR
    Vehicle:
    1970 maverick
    They work fine. Don't be in a hurry and work on a clean surface, so you don't lose any parts. when re-installing, torque all bolts to specifications.
     
    Ethan likes this.
  8. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,574
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    I used to rebuild C4 with a $30 kit from Sears. Didn't include the reverse servo or modulator, but for less than $50 total, I was back on road.
     
    Ethan and TeeEl like this.
  9. funkyole

    funkyole Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2021
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Location:
    Homewood junction
    Vehicle:
    1970 maverick grabber
    Your going to need a flywheel if you stick with the 157 tooth flywheel originally used on the 302 maverick. That 1992 engine will be a different balance than the 1982 and older engines.
     
  10. funkyole

    funkyole Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2021
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Location:
    Homewood junction
    Vehicle:
    1970 maverick grabber
    plus if you use the 250 6 cylinder bell housing you will definitely the 50 ounce flywheel. 164 tooth wont work with the 250 ci. bell,its designed for the 157 tooth.
     
  11. Ethan

    Ethan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2018
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Location:
    Springfield, MO
    Vehicle:
    1975 Ford Maverick, 2 dr
    I planned to use the old flywheel from the 250. I believe the 250s used the 157, unless I am mistaken. (I haven't actually counted the teeth yet.)
     
  12. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,574
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    Flexplate for 250 are zero balanced, didn't require weight. 157T were all 28oz, the 50oz are aftermarket only.
     
    Ethan likes this.
  13. funkyole

    funkyole Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2021
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Location:
    Homewood junction
    Vehicle:
    1970 maverick grabber
    250 flywheel behind any 302 is going to shake like a dog pooping razer blades. any speed,all speeds.
     
    Ethan likes this.
  14. Ethan

    Ethan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2018
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Location:
    Springfield, MO
    Vehicle:
    1975 Ford Maverick, 2 dr
    Makes sense now that I think about it. 250 wouldn't need any balancing because it is an inline arrangement. 5.0, being a V8, now has unbalanced rotation with the offset pistons, and therefore needs an eccentric mass (50 oz) to correct the unbalanced rotation. (Much like getting wheels balanced.)
     
  15. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,574
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    Sorry that ain't how it works, pistons and rods are balanced by counter weights on crankshaft. Inline or V makes no difference. Early small blocks required 28 oz to balance, around 1980 Ford CHEAPENED cranks by removing amount of cast iron, went to 50oz imbalance. Run really hard(racing), the 50oz cranks often break at #1 counterweight just behind the #1 & #5 rod journals.
     
    Ethan likes this.

Share This Page