Could a 300 i6 fit into the Mav/Comet?

Discussion in 'Technical' started by Positively Ralf, Oct 6, 2009.

  1. justin has a 74

    justin has a 74 Maverick bandit official

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    kentucky
    Vehicle:
    74 maverick /71 grabber /72 maverick
  2. MadFrenchman

    MadFrenchman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    carmel, ny
    Vehicle:
    1971 ford maverick
    my Maverick

    This 303 cubic inch motor makes 460 horsepower. It will run 10.60 at 125mph. Its very much fun to drive. Just proof that it can be done :) this motor is a lot faster than a 302" v8. The previous picture that was posted was from an old race, one of my slower ones.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Aug 23, 2011
  3. Resto

    Resto Benders Evil Twin

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    147
    Location:
    Yuma AZ
    Vehicle:
    73 Mav Buckets(69 351W, soon to be 408) Floorshift FXBDY AOD ,07 Glide,06 E250HA,01 Silverado
    Which Transmission are you useing?
     
  4. Bum's_Steer

    Bum's_Steer Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    787
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Maverick 2-dr. (Grabber clone) 1970 Maverick 2-dr.
    How far can a 250 I-6 be stroked? That way, you get the x-tra cubes with a block that's factory fit.

    As for Mopar motors, a big block B or RB (383-440) would be just as hard to fit as a big block Ford, so why not just do a BB Ford if you're going to the trouble.......but.....

    I remember a friend in high school with a near bone-stock 70 Dart Swinger with a 340, 4-speed and a 3:50-ish posi rear. The only mods the car had was a mild cam, aftermarket intake and 4-bbl and headers. With a set of sticky compound M/T street tires and a pair of cheapo traction bars, he could consistantly pull the front wheels 4"-8" at launch, and was a nightmare at the weekend street drags. He could trash my 440 6-pack Challenger R/T off the line and put a couple of car lenths on me, but with 111 more cubes, 500 more cfm and 3:23 gears, I'd catch up and start pulling ahead about the halfway mark, I'd win if I hit my shifts right, but it'd be scary close.

    I know a few die-hard Ford and Chevy dedicated racers and mechanics, and they all admit a small block Mopar is a killer motor to contend with. I've never run a performance SB Mopar, just had a few in trucks and vans, but I wonder what a well-built 340/360 could do in a Mav....especially with Dodge still building Performance engines based on that same small block
     
  5. Payette 302MAV

    Payette 302MAV Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    52
    Location:
    Payette Idaho
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick 302 painted Bahama Blue Metallic.
    sounds like every body is turring up ideas about what to turn there cars into now haha. how about a big turboed deisel to black smoke the trucks and move the pipe to the fuel neck area and move your filler neck to the side of you car haha. not saying ive been blacked smoked yet cuz those deisel trucks arent quick enough to catch my car ha i think it would just be funny and fun to turn the joke back.ha
     
  6. Mysidekickgoose

    Mysidekickgoose Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    45
    Location:
    Knoxville, TN
    Vehicle:
    1974 ford maverick 4-speed automatic I6, 94' Toyota Celica FWD I4 5-speed manual, 84' Toyota Celica RWD 2.4L I4 5-speed manual
    i think tht instead of comparing engines and worrying about tque and hp numbers we should look at this as a "could it be done?" and i would say tht if you wanted to put money into a slimmer performance radiator, electric fans, and prolly a top loader 4-speed it could be done with eithr no mods or possibly just engine mont mods to move it down and back towards the firewall. width shouldnt be a factor, its a straight 6 for crying out loud and if so, plasma cutter and welder willd do just fine on the coilover mounts. but hey, im just a 17 year old tennesseean wanting to go to wyotech to become a fab/bodyman. no biggie.
     
  7. Mad_Cow

    Mad_Cow Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    35
    Location:
    South Dakota
    Vehicle:
    "Madison"-1972 Maverick
    Anything can be done. Do it all. Like i said in the other thread. You can look at 100 mustangs and see 3 cars.... This thread proves you can look at 100 mavs and see 300 cars, or more. It's your car, if you have the cahones to do it and think you want to. Then do it. Personally since my brother started his rat-rod bug, i've been fartin around with the idea of chopped and chanelled... I know it has nothin to do with the motor. but YOUR mav is YOUR mav is YOUR mav... I almost did 300 instead of 302... but 302 was easier to get and had more info and aftermarket.
     
  8. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    :tiphat: My hat's offf to you for doing it, only I take issue with the part about it being faster than a 302. And besides, being as it's got six cylinders, it'll still sound like crap when you romp on it.:D
     
  9. mean_maverick

    mean_maverick Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,312
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Irvine, Kentucky
    Vehicle:
    '73 4dr
    :Handshake:thumbs2::tiphat:
     
  10. mojo

    mojo "Everett"- Senior Citizen Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Messages:
    5,250
    Likes Received:
    818
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chicago
    Vehicle:
    73 Comet GT-302 4bl
    Welcome to the forum from Northeastern Illinois. :Welcome:
    Nice setup Frenchman! I like it. Hats off to you.
    Might want to give some details on what the mechanicals are about.
    Been quite-a-bit of discussion abt the 300 in our cars. I suppose to those who may be interested in going that route you wud be the man to consult.
    As far as sounding like crap - I disagree. Sound is like beauty - it's in the eye/ear of the beholder. It just may be different than what they consider normal.
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2011
  11. b_ryce70Mav

    b_ryce70Mav Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    58
    Location:
    Shaw AFB, SC
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    How come nobody has mentioned the very recent car craft feature of a Mav with a turbo 300?
     
  12. Fordmaster169

    Fordmaster169 Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    913
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Coos Bay, Oregon
    Vehicle:
    1969 1/2 MavPro Street Project, 1972 F-100 stepside 4X4, 2015 F150 4X4, 2ea 2001 Ranger 4X4 extended cab step sides
    This is an old thread but I will answer the question that has been ask several times. YES!!!!!!!!!!! a C4 will bolt up to a 300 I6. It has the same bolt pattern as a 302. The only problem is a big flywheel/flex plate. You have to use a 164 tooth bell housing. I suppose you could get a neutral balanced 157 and us it also.
    Every engine has it design purpose. The 300 I6 was designed for a work horse in a truck. I have one in my 72 F100 4X4 with a granny low 4 speed trans behind it. The thing will idle through stuff that most trucks have to get all up in the 5000 RPM range to get through. Monster low end torque and power. Best 4X4 engine ever built IMO.
     
  13. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    If it were a diesel, it wouldn't sound bad. There's just something about hopped up 6 cylinder gas motors that's not kosher in the sound of the exhaust. Could be the split headers doing it.
     
  14. Mysidekickgoose

    Mysidekickgoose Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    45
    Location:
    Knoxville, TN
    Vehicle:
    1974 ford maverick 4-speed automatic I6, 94' Toyota Celica FWD I4 5-speed manual, 84' Toyota Celica RWD 2.4L I4 5-speed manual
    i dont no about u guys but i own a mav with a stock 250 straight 6 runnin a 4-into-1 single out the back and it sounds better than most new mustangs. and when its idling u could easly mistake it for a 289
     
  15. justin has a 74

    justin has a 74 Maverick bandit official

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    kentucky
    Vehicle:
    74 maverick /71 grabber /72 maverick

    :90::coco:
     

Share This Page