69 mustang gas tank ?

Discussion in 'Technical' started by flynbrd, Jan 10, 2011.

  1. flynbrd

    flynbrd Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Does the 75+ tank have a drain plug? will I need a new grommet and fitting for vent? I suppose the 75+ tank is the way to go
     
  2. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    How much you gonna pay to have 3" pipe snaked through your springs/shocks?
    All that stuff is springing up and down when you drive...
    When you go with a Stang tank, the weight is centered, the parts are going to be available forever, and you can run an 'off the shelf' mandrel bent Mustang dual exhaust kit (much cheaper than custom).

    It sounds like a winner to me, and everything will look 'right'...
     
  3. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    I always just buy preformed J/U pipes and cut and weld. Or do pie cuts. My last exhaust was 60 bucks. Thats including the price of the 40 series mufflers.
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2011
  4. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    No drain plug, i dont know about the vent stuff. It wasnt included but i had everything off my old tank that just swapped over. It has a vent on the top that runs a line to the canister under the hood. I dont know how the early cars have their vent systems.
     
  5. rthomas771

    rthomas771 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,064
    Likes Received:
    958
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    GA
    Vehicle:
    '74 Maverick 302 5-Speed.'60 Falcon V8. '63.5 Falcon HT
    I think if you use a 65-70 Mustang tank then you should vent the tank like the factory had them vented (gas cap) and not install the vapor valve. The Mustang tanks are flat on top and don’t have the expansion area at the top of the tank. Strap-in fuel tanks on the Maverick are enlarged at the top so that there is an area representing 10-20% of the total fuel tank volume above the level of the fuel tank filler tube where these gasses may collect when the gasoline expands due to heat. When I got my Maverick the previous owner attempted at installing a 65-68 Mustang tank and made a total mess of things. I was easier to use a Maverick tank than trying to re-invent the wheel. I got my new tank from Rock Auto complete with sending unit for around $120 shipped. I already had the rear valance removed before installing the tank.
     
  6. injectedmav

    injectedmav Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,114
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    142
    Location:
    Georgia
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick 2dr 5.0l EFI, 2003 Expedition(wife's), 2002 F150 Supercab King Ranch
    I've been considering this modification too and would like to hear from as many who have done it as possible. I do understand the concern for the lack of air space in the top of the tank though. The mavericks with the valve at the top of the tank were in response to the fed requiring safety measures for rollover. The valve has a stopper in the top that prevents fuel loss in the event of a rollover and if you use a vented gas cap, it will just spill out of the cap. As one who has rolled one, my 72 comet:rant2: , I am somewhat concerned about maintaining that safety measure if I'm not using a fuel safe cell.
     
  7. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    Pics

    I couldnt get my camera working, but i got some cellphone pics. When i get the camera working ill post close up pics with a ruler. Anyways there is 3/4" of clearance between the tank and the valance. And 1/2" between the straps and the valance. [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2011
  8. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    Pics

    I went to the junkyard and got the valance off a 71. I came home, sanded all the paint off and primed it. It bolted up just fine and cleared the gas tank. In this pic where the valance bends is where its stamped for the plate. Like all of them are. Last time i checked Ford never changed the body dimensions during 71-77, so my 75 shouldnt be different then any other year. [​IMG]
     
  9. Jamie Miles

    Jamie Miles the road warrior

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    383
    Location:
    Lawrenceville, GA
    Vehicle:
    13 Mavericks
    Yours looks fine. I've seen some that didn't.
     
  10. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    I am going with a Stang tank soley for the exhaust situation and centering of the weight on my 75. I want to go with off the shelf exhaust, placed in it's traditional place. So I don't think that the Stang tank mod should be dismissed. It is a good option/alternative to using the stock tank.
     
  11. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    Yes... but if you do more checking, they never used the large tank with a valance. That makes a big difference. The large tank cars had more room in the back without a valance, so they used it.
     
  12. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    I dont see the point here. If im using an early valance(i converted to small bumpers) with a larger tank. It shouldnt matter if its a 75 or a 71. Its going to fit the same. But dont take my word for it. Theres already 71-73 guys on here running the larger tank. And true Ford never used the valance with the large tank, but guess what? I AM! so are all the other guys with small bumpers on their 74-76. I guess you missed that part when you were checking.....
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2011
  13. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    I do like the centered pipe look more. Plus then you can run one of those 69 stang valances with the cut outs.
     
  14. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    Yes, and some of those folks, maybe not every one, but some had problems getting it in their car. At the factory, tolerances are considered "good" at 3/8" from car to car, so it happens when you are talking about such a tight fit.

    I am not saying that the stock tank is the wrong option for some folks, just posting some potential postives to consider when making the choice. Choice is a good thing.
     
  15. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    Then you also have to take into consideration all the people who have bent Valances. I think thats where the rumor got started that the valence wont clear the tank.
     

Share This Page