Carb Recommendations

Discussion in 'Technical' started by Masta T, Jan 19, 2014.

  1. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,796
    Likes Received:
    671
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    Yep, I would probably get the all aluminum version.
     
  2. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    yeah, im sure its an improved resin as I doubt they want to repeat carters problem.
    but non polished aluminum is cheaper then this..and polished aluminum is the most expensive of the 3
    but easier to be safe then sorry to just get cheaper AL body
     
  3. Masta T

    Masta T 1337 |\/|4\/3R1(K

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2005
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick 302
    Just wanted to give a update. I went with the weiand stealth 8020, and a demon street carb 1901. Finally got it all put together, and everything went smoothly. I got to say there is a substantial difference from before, so much more power and response, it sounds quite different now too. Demon was very easy to install, just needed an additional bracket to hold the spring for the kickdown, and had to bend the kickdown bar a little to get it to sit good. Didn't have to do any tuning on it, just adjust the timing some, and now runs great. Thank you everything for your advise.
     
  4. 19Grabber72

    19Grabber72 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    92
    Location:
    Cedar Falls, Iowa
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick 2 Door Sport Sedan Grabber
    So now that we are this far out from your install, how are things working, responding etc?
     
  5. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    Update: the three twos are now 16 years old and still no leaks, still never been adjusted. And they sit for a month at a time between fire-ups with a mixture of 93 E10 and conventional 91
     
  6. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,796
    Likes Received:
    671
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    I ran the Street Demon for a year or so on mine, I loved it. The engine absolutely screamed when that big secondary opened. :D
     
  7. Shorty

    Shorty Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    220
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lafayette, In
    Vehicle:
    '72 Maverick, 347 c.i., w/ dual quads, TKO 600 5-speed transmission, back halved w/ 4-link, '16 F150, 5.0 Coyotte, regular cab, shortbed, lowered 3/5 & 1-owner '79 Trans Am.
    I went with Jason W Thompson's idea: DSCF9191.JPG
    They're sitting on my Blueprint Engines 347. This manifold will only use Edelbrock Perfomer carbs (or whatever preceded them.)

    Bruce
     
    jasonwthompson and baddad457 like this.
  8. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    Not my choice for carbs, but it's better than a boring single four setup :thumbs2: I'd thought about using an Air Gap 2x4 manifold with two 350 cfm Holley 2 bbls someday.
     
  9. Shorty

    Shorty Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    220
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lafayette, In
    Vehicle:
    '72 Maverick, 347 c.i., w/ dual quads, TKO 600 5-speed transmission, back halved w/ 4-link, '16 F150, 5.0 Coyotte, regular cab, shortbed, lowered 3/5 & 1-owner '79 Trans Am.
    I've had this intake for years before finally getting an engine worthy of it. Everything I had read said that Holley's wouldn't fit no how, no way not even sideways. I think it's the carb spacing that is the limitation. You're right in that it has more 'curb appeal' than a single quad.

    Bruce
    IMG_5979.JPG
     
  10. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    Yea, the pads are too close together for Holley 4 bbls to fit. (their 2 bbls would though with 2bbl to 4 bbl spacers on it) Offenhauser used to make offset spacers to allow them to fit their 2x4 intakes, which had the same spacing the Edelbrock has. I went with the 3x2 setup sheerly due to the sound they make at WOT. Like no other carb setup I know of. Got hooked on this when I heard a Pontiac 3x2 setup when in highschool (with quiet mufflers) Different than a single four and a 2x4.
     
  11. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    523
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
    I missed out on an Edelbrock cross ram not too long ago. Drug my feet because I plan to run EFI and when I finally decided I should have it just to have it it was gone.

    Has a tri power on my GTO for a while, you are right, they have a very distinct sound!
     
  12. Shorty

    Shorty Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    220
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lafayette, In
    Vehicle:
    '72 Maverick, 347 c.i., w/ dual quads, TKO 600 5-speed transmission, back halved w/ 4-link, '16 F150, 5.0 Coyotte, regular cab, shortbed, lowered 3/5 & 1-owner '79 Trans Am.
    I'm still breaking in the engine so I haven't heard them howling yet plus my exhaust is pretty loud. After we do some major chassis work I plan to reroute the tail pipes. You appear to know carburetors pretty well can you tell me what would fit this intake?
    IMG_5978.JPG
    It fits a 302 Ford bock and I believe it would require coolant ports drilled into it in the places at the bottom of the picture as well as crank trigger ignition. From what I've been able to learn it was for an experimental 327 cubic inch Ford engine.

    Bruce
     
  13. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    Sorry it took so long to get back here, been a long week
    4 carbs ? I'd think Webers. But I could be wrong. That would be super sexy though o_O:thumbs2: You are correct about having to drill and tap those bosses for the coolant ports. You'd need a plug for the distributor hole too. I wonder if an Explorer distributor stub would fit under it ?
     
  14. Shorty

    Shorty Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    220
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lafayette, In
    Vehicle:
    '72 Maverick, 347 c.i., w/ dual quads, TKO 600 5-speed transmission, back halved w/ 4-link, '16 F150, 5.0 Coyotte, regular cab, shortbed, lowered 3/5 & 1-owner '79 Trans Am.
    I was thinking Webers too. It would definitely require a distributor stub to drive the oil pump. It would also require someone who fully understands carburetor synchronization and fine tuning them to get the engine to run properly. I doubt I will ever use it but I couldn't resist buying it when it was presented to me years ago.

    Bruce
     
  15. jasonwthompson

    jasonwthompson Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,347
    Likes Received:
    463
    Trophy Points:
    196
    Location:
    Carrollton TX
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    Are there any casting numbers on that intake?
     

Share This Page