Compression ratio

Discussion in 'Technical' started by 73cometter, Dec 5, 2019.

  1. 73cometter

    73cometter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2016
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Location:
    Maryland
    Vehicle:
    73 Comet GT
    What's the compression ratio on my 73 Comet with 302, also if I installed a set of the 68 302 4x heads that are 53.5 cc, what would my compression ratio be then
     
  2. Hotrock

    Hotrock Rick, an MCCI Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,467
    Likes Received:
    713
    Trophy Points:
    313
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Munroe Falls, Ohio
    Vehicle:
    1972 Mercury Comet, 1997 Mustang Cobra, 2019 Ford Edge ST
    I have 54cc aftermarket heads on my .030 over 302. My static compression ratio is a little over 10 to 1.
     
  3. TeeEl

    TeeEl Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2019
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    472
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Location:
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Ford Maverick Resto-Mod
    Stock is 8:1. Those heads would bump it to somewhere between 8.5:1 and 9:1. I have '66 289 heads (54.5cc) with flat top pistons and it's around 9.5:1. Your stock motor would have dished pistons...
     
    Hotrock likes this.
  4. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,574
    Likes Received:
    2,331
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    Plus approx .030 taller deck, so pistons are likely to be in the hole.

    Apparently was easier to machine less off deck surface than redesign a low compression head.
     
  5. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    The heads will bump it a half point. Big question is, has this motor been rebuilt ? Very unlikely it hasn't at this late date so the stock ratio may not be in effect here.
     
    TeeEl likes this.
  6. TeeEl

    TeeEl Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2019
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    472
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Location:
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Ford Maverick Resto-Mod
    So the 302 has a deck height that's .030" taller than a 289?...
     
  7. Acornridgeman

    Acornridgeman MCCI Wisconsin State Rep Moderator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    6,495
    Likes Received:
    938
    Trophy Points:
    426
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick Grabber, 72 Maverick Grabber Restomod
    289 and 302 up to 1972 were both 8.206"
     
    TeeEl likes this.
  8. TeeEl

    TeeEl Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2019
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    472
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Location:
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Ford Maverick Resto-Mod
    Okay, well the engine currently in my Maverick is a '68. The original '73 302 shortblock is sitting in the garage...
     
  9. Acornridgeman

    Acornridgeman MCCI Wisconsin State Rep Moderator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    6,495
    Likes Received:
    938
    Trophy Points:
    426
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick Grabber, 72 Maverick Grabber Restomod
    There is a date code stamped on the block near the distributor hole. Is that where you found it is a 1968? Because some mistake the casting code on the side of the block - the C8OE - as meaning the block is from 1968 - that casting code on the side of the block is just when the block was designed, not when it was made.
     
  10. Acornridgeman

    Acornridgeman MCCI Wisconsin State Rep Moderator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    6,495
    Likes Received:
    938
    Trophy Points:
    426
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick Grabber, 72 Maverick Grabber Restomod
    Here is a pic of where to look - just above the oil pressure sending unit - this pic shows a 1972 date


    [​IMG]
     
    Crazy Larry and baddad457 like this.
  11. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    That would be the build date. (first time I've seen this stamping) The date the block was cast would be where the casting numbers are found above the starter. A 73 block is .020 taller than the earlier blocks, which can easily be milled off.
     
    Crazy Larry likes this.
  12. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,574
    Likes Received:
    2,331
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    Unless engine has been through a commercial rebuild, orig date should be there. Some years back I pictured the stamp on my orig Comet block.(killed by photobucket)

    Stamp on my '69 Fairlane 302

    1969, June, 19th day, B has no meaning other than a assembly code(my guess it refers to line of assembly).
    Car has a July 1 assembly date.


    a69302builddate.JPG

    Here's a scruffy old '68 289 I have in corner.

    1968, March, 2nd day... V assembly code.

    a68289biolddate.JPG

    Found the Comet pict. 1972, June 7. This car has a June 23 build date.

    a72302assemblydate.JPG
     
    mojo and baddad457 like this.
  13. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,744
    Likes Received:
    637
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    It was the D4 Engineering code blocks (74 thru 77) that had the .02x" higher decks Even if the 68 block has been rebuilt it may have cheap rebuild kit pistons with low crowns, extra thick head gaskets, etc. The only way to really know the compression ratio is to measure it. Then we can discuss dynamic compression ratio...
     
    BBMS18 and mojo like this.
  14. TeeEl

    TeeEl Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2019
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    472
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Location:
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Ford Maverick Resto-Mod
    It's definitely a '68. It began life as a 289, but I swapped in 302 crank & rods. Saved my '73 for a future build.

    So which is it? '73 or '74 that has a .020" taller deck?...
     
  15. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,744
    Likes Received:
    637
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    Blocks that have a number cast into the side starting with "D4" (1974 design) have the higher deck height. Don't remember if they were .023" or .026" higher, it's been awhile. In '78 they went back to the original deck height with the "D8" (1978 design) blocks.
     
    TeeEl likes this.

Share This Page