i disagree. if i buy a car and it still has the original stripes down the side, or the stripes are hinding behind spray paint or such then im fairly convinced of what it is... and what it isnt. so i dont think a Marti report would be needed
Yes i would agree a marti report is not needed but thats not what i mean.. if a car has been taken down to bare metal then primered and you were told it was a grabber. A marti report is the only real way to know.
in that case, i agree, but that's a rare case. most people dont put that kinda work into these cars. lol
here's the vin's from the cars that i currently have in my junkyard: 4K31F560864- '74 Comet GT 3K92F274382- '73 Maverick 4dr 3K91L215817- '73 Maverick 2dr LDO 1K31F524379- '71 Comet GT 7K91L157592- '77 Maverick 2dr 5K92F115744- '75 Maverick 4dr 2F31F563799- '72 Comet GT (not a parts car, belongs to Scott Hilton)
Found the picture that I took of a buck tag. Needs to go into the crushed pile of VIN's, found this one in a junkyard a while back. Who can help complete the VIN for this one?
Or a 999 from ford. 70 Grabbers had some tell tale signs that they were factory Grabbers, and with some experience you'll learn that....
More fresh kills 2K31T524487 62B 9A KF 3 W 53 Fresno, Calif. 4K30L545811 54B 5H BU W 6 53 Stockton, Calif. 6K92L178648 54A 2R BA W 3 71 Nampa, Idaho. These 2 Comets and 1 Maverick are all in junkyards. Consider them parted and scrapped.