Power Tips and Secrets

Discussion in 'Drag Racing' started by riporter, Oct 25, 2004.

  1. riporter

    riporter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Charleston S.C.
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick 2 dr. modified street cruiser, 72 Comet tube chassis drag car
  2. stockhatch

    stockhatch Re Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    772
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Boiling Spring Lakes NC
    Vehicle:
    '72 Grabber
    Heck yeah, it would be awesome to have a wideband O2 AND an EGT probe. Then tie it all into a datalogger and you would be set up! Thats my plan if I ever get the turbo on my car......or even get the car back on its feet for that matter :D

    AC
     
  3. 1/4Mile Comet

    1/4Mile Comet Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Salina,KS
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    Don't Understand

    :cool: I don't understand the skepticism of getting 350-360 H.P. out of a 302. My motor is a stock bore 302 with trickflow twisted wedge heads edelbrock rpm air-gap intake with 9.7 to 1 compression. It has a very mild hydralic roller cam .533/.544 lift and 215 duration with 1.7 roller rockers and a 650 double pumper to top it off. And it is making 370 H.P. and 350 ft. lbs. of torque at 6300 rpm's at the fly wheel. I have the dyno sheets to back this up for the non beilevers. If you need to see them.:confused:
     
  4. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    I agree. 350 HP from a 302=easy. CarCraft made 400 if memory serves me correctly....with AFR165's and a MILD short block.
     
  5. Rick Book

    Rick Book Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,744
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    197
    Location:
    Thailand
    Vehicle:
    Missing my old '70 Maverick
    removed earlier comment re: h.p. out of 302

    :smash:
     
  6. ohthat72mav

    ohthat72mav Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Vehicle:
    72' Maverick Sprint
    courier, couldnt a bad plug/plug wire throw off a tune? even if so, it shouldnt take 8 o2 sensors to figure out such a simple problem.i really dont know where i was going with that point. sry : /
     
  7. ohthat72mav

    ohthat72mav Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Vehicle:
    72' Maverick Sprint
    i hope i can get 400 hp as easy as carcraft :D
     
  8. stockhatch

    stockhatch Re Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    772
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Boiling Spring Lakes NC
    Vehicle:
    '72 Grabber
    I think CarCraft has the magic dyno or something. AFR or not, those are some almost unbelievable numbers. I have NEVER seen any dyno sheets besides theirs to back this up. That would be what...about 320RWHP minimum through a T5? Havent seen it with 165's. I would be more inclined to believe twisted wedge heads made that kind of power as they flow better than the AFRs. This is NOT to say that 400HP cant be made with a 302, just that with AFR 165s it would surprise me.

    AC
     
  9. ohthat72mav

    ohthat72mav Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Vehicle:
    72' Maverick Sprint
    maybe its just a magic motor...i hope i have one :D

    question - does more flow ALWAYS = more horsepower?? or do properly matched heads for the motor make more hp, e.g. depending on compression ratio, cam, etc, etc...could the afr's perhaps just be a good match for what carcraft was runnign? i dotn knwo what to believe because there are so many different versions of the "truth" out there...can anyone help me out?
    -beau
     
  10. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    I don't know what they did. Maybe magic, maybe just luck (and I wish they'd give me some of it too!). I do know that flow numbers are important, but not exactly a apples-to-apples comparison of different heads. For instance take a set of Yates big-port heads and put 'em on a 302. Ports are so large that it'd take a half metric ton of of epoxy to get enough velocity to actually get all that air into the cylinders at anything lower than 12,000 RPM. From what I understand, that's how AFR heads make their power. From velocity. Velocity=torque and torque=HP no matter what engine it is.

    Mis match a set of 165's though on a race-built 427 stroker windsor and you'll be rewarded with a awesome low end but falls off above 5500 RPM.

    It's all about careful selection of parts. I'm in that predicament now. Whether or not to go with the cam that was recommended....when the one I have now worked great on the combo I DID run.
     
  11. ohthat72mav

    ohthat72mav Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Vehicle:
    72' Maverick Sprint
    i see...thanks for the explanation...good luck with your parts predicament
     
  12. stockhatch

    stockhatch Re Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    772
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Boiling Spring Lakes NC
    Vehicle:
    '72 Grabber
    Good point on the proper matching of components. Its true that too much head or the wrong cam on a small cube engine can adversely effect HP. My main point was that I have seen a few AFR headed combos and NONE of them come close to the 400HP mark(at least N/A). Sure would be nice if Im wrong though. Any easy 400HP is a good thing :D

    AC
     
  13. AppMaverick

    AppMaverick Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,306
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick 2dr
    my comment on this isn't really worth anything. Have just been having a blast reading this thread and thought I'd resurrect it. Makes all my repairs seem minor.

    Respect!
     
  14. ShelbyMaverik74

    ShelbyMaverik74 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    52
    Location:
    Enon, OH
    Vehicle:
    1974 Shelby Mav Clone
    Yeah

    I dont think anyone has touched this thread for a while. but i was gonna add that AirFlowResearch has dyno charts on their website for N/A 302 and they make some goood power.

    I bout a pair myself havent run em yet but hope to be pleased.
     
  15. Killercomet

    Killercomet Member MCCI

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Messages:
    418
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    99
    Location:
    Dirtyburg, WV
    Vehicle:
    1973 comet
    MY AFR 165 Competition sieres head gained me 10mph and a full second over a 58cc early ford casting head. As of a few months back it is making a touch over 400 at the crank at 7150 rpms. With stock 302 bottom end, 10:1 TRW flat tops, 520/540 224/244 @ .050 hyd cam, RPM Air Gap and 750 dbl pumper.
     

Share This Page