solid lifters

Discussion in 'Technical' started by scooper77515, Dec 9, 2006.

  1. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    For me, a $750 permanent upgrade that provides all those benefits is not even a worry. It will just take me longer to do it...It sounds like I am convinced at this point that solid roller is the way to go...
     
  2. igo1090

    igo1090 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    706
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    catonsville, md
    Vehicle:
    75 maverick, 93 tbird tube car
    i feel that if running a solid roller, you should use stud girdles. yes, there are guys out there not using them, usually with very mild springs. occasionally they break a stud. my feeling is that you are already spending $800 for the roller. a girdle is what? 150-200 for sbf? cheap insurance against broken studs and it helps maintain lash settings. jmho.

    by the way, whether getting by with the lighter springs ($130) or using heavy ones ($250+), you will be changeing them more often. they take a beating. not a bad idea to get a tool to check seat pressure on the car. check pressure on initial install, & check periodically thereafter on a regular basis.

    when installing, you must check p/v clearance.
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2006
  3. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!

    I run these: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/SOLID-BAR-7-16-FORD-289-302-HO-351W-ROCKER-STUD-GIRDLE_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ33623QQhashZitem200053799861QQihZ010QQitemZ200053799861QQrdZ1QQsspagenameZWDVW

    cheap yet effective. Also available in 3/8.
     
  4. stmanser

    stmanser Looking for a Maverick

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,818
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Davenport, Iowa
    i second that
     
  5. Scootermagoo

    Scootermagoo Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Vehicle:
    1973 Ford Maverick Grabber ginger & white factory 302 c-4 car LDO package
    funny you should mention hydraulics and noise.. I find the sound of a lumpy cammed 302 with a solid much more intresting then a hydraulic cam with a dead lifter >;) as for longevity solids will last as long as a hydraulic if not longer just keep them adjusted once between races or once every 6 months I have no complaints whatsoever

    the correct way to break in and run a solid is as follows

    adjust cam to the reccomended lash and fire off and run the endine over 2500 rpm for 20-30 minutes. shut the engine off and drain the oil and change the filter (removes the breakin lube and anything metallic in the oil that rubbed off the cam and lifters)
    some flake is normal as edges wear off the cam but lots of flake means lots of wear.. (aka flat cam) if you get past this point while the engine is still warm/hot pull the valve covers off and run the lash again (fire the engine off to warm it between heads) then let the engine sit over night and cool off
    soon as you check the car the next morning check the cold lash write it down and average it out.
    drive or race the car a few times (maybe 5-10 passes or 500 street miles)
    drain out the oil and change the filter again (cutting the filter and checking oil for metal) run the lash hot again then cool it off and check the cold lash if it hasn't changed much you now know how much lash to use cold and the cam should last a long time with regular oil changes and adjustments
     
  6. T.L.

    T.L. Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2002
    Messages:
    4,187
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Maverick 2-door, V-8
    'Sounds like a real hassle...
     
  7. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,576
    Likes Received:
    2,928
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    or..install ...hydraulic roller cam... and drive off (y)
    ...Frank...:bouncy:
     
  8. Fordmaster169

    Fordmaster169 Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    913
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Coos Bay, Oregon
    Vehicle:
    1969 1/2 MavPro Street Project, 1972 F-100 stepside 4X4, 2015 F150 4X4, 2ea 2001 Ranger 4X4 extended cab step sides
    The last 392 I built I ran a solid flat tappit cam in. I had the cam coustom cut by Babe Erson (who has sence passed away) I got the cam, lifters, springs, retainers and lock in a kit designed to work together on a set of dart heads, cut for my car setup. I installed a stud girtle made the lash adjustments recomended for the cam and broke in the cam and lifters. I did all the oil change and re- adjustments on the lash. Took it to the drag strip and raced all night (about 10-12 runs at 7.37 in the 1/8th) Re-adjusted the lash and slowed the car down to 7.60 in the next test and tune night. Ran the car for another 3 1/2 years without pulling a valve cover on the car. So the ones here that say that solid cams are noisy and need adjusting all the time have never had a properly set up solid cam in thier car. I will never go back to a hydraulic cam, even on the street. My next engine (408 or 427) will have a solid roller in it. It will be a 50% street 50% track car. You just cant get the range of performence out of a hydraulic cam. OK even if you have to adjust the lash every year, so what. The trade off for performence is well worth it.

    My :2cents:
     
  9. jmgford

    jmgford Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    147
    Location:
    Iowa
    Vehicle:
    '71 Maverick, '69 Fairlane 351, '12 F-150, '02 ZX2
    Ditto.
     
  10. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!

    besides, those who say that solids are noisy and need constant adjustment have not been around OLD stuff...before hydraulic valvetrain was widely used. Remember the Boss 302? Those were solid. Same with some 427s and 428s, as well as some boss 351's and the famous boss '9. Remember the sweet sound of the valvetrain clatter? That is music to ANY hotrodder's ears! Many times you can't even hear it. Dad's old 331...silent. Couldn't tell it wasn't a hydraulic cam. Same for my Mustang.

    Is the swap worth it? Dang right! Especially considering the solid roller stuff. It opens up a whole new world of possibilities. The flat tappet cams are limited by design to the amount of lift and duration, as well as the rate of lift. Most folks don't know, but a flat tappet cam has a faster rate of lift up to about .050" lift...then the roller blows it out of the water. Ever seen some inverted lobe profiles? Try that with a flat-tappet cam! Hydraulic roller cams have limits too...their weight and design limit the amount of RPM. You cannot run a valve spring thats stiff enough to control the valve at lots of RPM (usually around 6000 is the max for them, +/-.....) without collapsing the plunger in the lifters. A rev kit will take care of that, but adds cost and complexity to the system....once you get to the cost of the rev kit, lifters, spider, dogbones, springs...you could have had a solid roller installed and make a bunch more power especially up in the higher RPM.

    Ya know...if I had known all this years ago, I would not be as poor as I am today! We've tried everything...solids, hydraulics, hyd rollers, and solid rollers. Think about it. I've had probably 10 different cams. Each one around $100 a piece excluding the roller cams. That's what...$1000 give or take? I could have bought a GOOD solid roller, lifters, springs, pushrods, and rockers for that...and would have made more power and more reliably...and spent less money. No need in doing things 3-4-5....10 times when it only has to be done once.
     
  11. eddie1975

    eddie1975 Windsor Specialist

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,226
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Martinsburg, WV
    Vehicle:
    sold

    easy now one at a time:D
     
  12. ShadowMaster

    ShadowMaster The Bad Guy

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    The ShadowLands
    Vehicle:
    1969 1/2 Maverick
    For a street/strip car this is really a good idea.
     
  13. Scotty P

    Scotty P Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    Location:
    santa rosa, ca
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    I once had a 1969 Z-28 that I set the valves once after a rebuild and ran it for 30,000+ miles without removing the covers. I agree, properly set-up solids are a non event. For my new motor, it was also a lot less expensive than converting my non-roller and buying the parts. Again, the only negative I hate is the break-in although, I have never has an issue with that. FWIW, Scott
     
  14. Scootermagoo

    Scootermagoo Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Vehicle:
    1973 Ford Maverick Grabber ginger & white factory 302 c-4 car LDO package
    It's hard to explain to guys why solids are better and why they can last a long time.
    I'm not saying hydraulics are bad and I'm not saying there isn't a place for them but adjusting valves takes 30 minutes after you warm the engine up and once a year is not that big of a deal..
    And with a 302 firing order cam vrs a 351/5L firing order you just don't understand how good a solid sounds.
    Sure it's "noisy" but complete valve train control and no possibilities of lifter collapse (which I had with a 220 @ 050 cam at about 5700 rpm).
    And that 302 rumpity rumpity firing order it's a beautifull thing.(ask anyone with a 306hp 289 in like a shelby or a gt)

    soon as I get the video camera and mic working you hydraulic guys can hear a solid lifter engine running >;) maybe we can convert a few more
     
  15. T.L.

    T.L. Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2002
    Messages:
    4,187
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Maverick 2-door, V-8
    So a 351/late model 302 firing order sounds different from a older 302??...
     

Share This Page