Typical size pipe for 300 hp engine

Discussion in 'Technical' started by Slk70, Apr 25, 2007.

  1. stmanser

    stmanser Looking for a Maverick

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,818
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Davenport, Iowa
    i have my exhaust going up and over the axle and exits out at the corners just below the rollpan.. the exhaust shop did it and i dont notice any restriction

    of course it probably is more restricted than a straight pipe.. but i still have plenty of power
     
  2. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    Just gotta remark (no surprise;) )
    There is a big difference between shop bent pipe and mandrel bent pipe.

    Therefore the folks knocking 3" exhaust should know that shop bent 3" pipe flows less exhaust than 2.5" mandrel bent pipe!

    So, if you have a shop bent 3" exhaust system, it really is not overkill.
    Is it? :D
    Or
    Would you tell someone that has a mandrel bent 2.5" system that it is overkill because it outflows a non-mandrel 3"?
     
  3. T.L.

    T.L. Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2002
    Messages:
    4,187
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Maverick 2-door, V-8
    You obviously have no idea how an exhaust system works...
     
  4. T.L.

    T.L. Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2002
    Messages:
    4,187
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Maverick 2-door, V-8
    So??...



    Uhm...it is.

    For most street small blocks, it definitely is overkill, however it is a misconception that a 3-inch system "flows" better. It doesn't, it's just louder, so a 2-1/2 mandrel-bent system would certainly be better than a 3-inch of either type. I thought we've already had this discussion. Size alone is not what creates "flow". Most guys who run 3-inch systems on engines with the horsepower rating mentioned, are doing so to compensate for having a small....well nevermind...
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2007
  5. Slk70

    Slk70 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    I know that a 3" pipe would be best on a strong stroked well built 347 type or big block motor. We are talking 300+ maybe with considerable add ons. I agree it is overkill to the max. Would sound good, but would be robbed of it's guts... To open.

    J Miller how do you really feel about your exhaust guy. Experienced vet or still in training. That has a lot to do with it to. Please explain the sender unit issue to me more.
     
  6. Slk70

    Slk70 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    Back to my original point. 300 definitely too big, but now I think I need to look at the cam specs again to see where motor makes it's power. I'm guessing maybe 2 1/4.
     
  7. j miller

    j miller Montana MCCI state rep

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,027
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    177
    Location:
    Polson, Mt
    Vehicle:
    77 2 door Maverick, 250ci, power disc brakes, a/c,
    i asked several mechanics and my muffler shop before making my change. with my set up they agreed that my shop bent pipes were constricting the flow. the exaust shop i go to has been around for 15 years and he runs his own rail car at the local track. NOT a green trainee.
    the question on the sending unit is this. on later tanks the sending unit is mounted on the driver side of the tank therefore making it very tight to get the exaust past safely. there is little room between the spring and the side of the tank.
    T.L-- you and i rarely agree and this is another instance. we'll leave it at that. there are ways of stateing you're point without being rude, juvenile,or insulting!
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2007
  8. Thack

    Thack vision advicator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Moreno Valley Ca
    Vehicle:
    71 2 Dr Maverick, 70 Mustang Sportsroof, 77 F100 4x4, 72 maverick grabber wifes
    Here's what we have on Tammy's car and it seam to work pretty good. Shorty headers 1.5", 2.5" collector 2.5" mandrel bent tube, 1.5 H pipe, arrow chamber mufflers. Her car dynoed at 300 RWHP with a relitivly small cam 220 dur@.050 and .498 lift for both intake and exhaust. RPM heads 1.90/1.6 valves, airgap, and 600 carb.
     
  9. j miller

    j miller Montana MCCI state rep

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,027
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    177
    Location:
    Polson, Mt
    Vehicle:
    77 2 door Maverick, 250ci, power disc brakes, a/c,
    sounds like a fun combo. hopefully you will get her up and running quickly. that mandrel bending makes all the difference.
     
  10. T.L.

    T.L. Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2002
    Messages:
    4,187
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Maverick 2-door, V-8
    It's not a matter of being rude. You challenged me and basically said that my opinion "doesn't matter". Well 'sorry, but it DOES. If anything, telling someone that their opinion "doesn't matter" is rude, so before you accuse me.... .

    This is nothing more than a typical case of "bigger is better (or more powerful)" mentality. Unless you are running a 500+ horsepower engine, 3-inch is of no benefit and WILL NOT "flow" better than a 2-1/2-inch system, mandrel-bent or otherwise. If you like the noise and think it looks cool, then by all means, do what you like with your car. I don't care if you agree with me or not. I'm not gonna argue this topic anymore, because some people are hell-bent on remaining ignorant about certain things...
     
  11. Maverick Man

    Maverick Man The Original Maverick Man

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,559
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    137
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    Two 1973 LDO Mavericks (one 4 Drag one 4 driving like Mad on the roads :) ) also have a 75 6cyl Stock! Ok, well sort of Stock :P
    everyone read and learn...

    http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/exhaust_system_installation/index.html

    numbers never lie ;) that should answer your question Slk70.... and should put an end to all debates. ;) group hug please.

    i might ad that was also on a dynojet which does put higher numbers then a mustang chassis dyno.

    so that should answer some questions.

    i run this same system on both of my cars.

    Slk70 you have heard my car... it is very quite.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2007
  12. j miller

    j miller Montana MCCI state rep

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,027
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    177
    Location:
    Polson, Mt
    Vehicle:
    77 2 door Maverick, 250ci, power disc brakes, a/c,
    maybe one day those of us on the east coast can hear it too. thanks for the link.
    highjack-- maverick man-- did you know there is a company selling carbon fiber hoods on ebay that look identicle to yours? theirs are alot more expensive tho.
     
  13. Maverick Man

    Maverick Man The Original Maverick Man

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,559
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    137
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    Two 1973 LDO Mavericks (one 4 Drag one 4 driving like Mad on the roads :) ) also have a 75 6cyl Stock! Ok, well sort of Stock :P
    yep they been doing that for years. they don't have them. not worried about it anymore but thanks for heads up.
     
  14. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,823
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    Hard to make any determination from that article. They have a 400 hp 302 drag race only car and the only hp & torque figures they spout are peak numbers. Doesn't really have much to do with the original poster's 300 hp car that probably sees mostly sub-3000 rpm strreet driving.
     
  15. RabidCustoms

    RabidCustoms sic minds demand sic toys

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,394
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    117
    ....you forgot to add that you can Always believe Everything written in a magazine :D

    (sorry, havent stirred any pots for a while):rolleyes:
     

Share This Page