V8 z-bar dimensions and angles please

Discussion in 'Technical' started by EngineerDuane, Apr 17, 2018.

  1. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    Thnaks for the follow up reply. Mental notes taken and filed away for future use. Hopefully I can remember later on which mental cabinet I stored it away in though! lol
     
    Shorty likes this.
  2. EngineerDuane

    EngineerDuane Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2018
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Location:
    Edmonton Alberta
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick
    The 8 and 12 degree angles conflict in the sketch unless the bar us tapered 4 degrees, can you confirm please.

    Is the long bar connect to the tube exactly in the middle, no dimension is specified.

    Was there any reason ford put the c shape bend in the lower arm? Many installations omit it, but there may have been some reason.

    Thank you.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. EngineerDuane

    EngineerDuane Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2018
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Location:
    Edmonton Alberta
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick
    No wait, I see the bend in the bar now. 8 and 12 is fine. I just didn’t see it in the sketch at first.
     
  4. Maverocket

    Maverocket Bob Williams

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,120
    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Northwest
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Mav, 62 F100 unibody
    The brake in the middle section is compound. Was hard to convey in the sketch without spending a lot more time measuring. I’m guessing those angles are inconsequential to the function of the bar. 1 square = 1/2” on diagram. I think the “c” bend gives a more consistent travel length. The straight arm loses more throw as it is applied. CD64D866-BD1C-490B-B355-2C0D5A5AE60D.jpeg
     
  5. EngineerDuane

    EngineerDuane Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2018
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Location:
    Edmonton Alberta
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick
    thanks one more time.
     
  6. Maverocket

    Maverocket Bob Williams

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,120
    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Northwest
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Mav, 62 F100 unibody
    Sure, hope it helped.
     
  7. spork1o1

    spork1o1 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    128
    Location:
    Michigan
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick
    20180114_202802.jpg 20180114_203113.jpg $275 + shipping
     
  8. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    A few things to also consider: Once you fabbed a bar, it will require heat treating to stiffen the steel. Otherwise it'll bend in short order. And yes, going hydraulic does require stiffening the firewall. And fabricating that stiffener. I went with a Modern Driveline kit to use with a McCleod hydro throwout bearing but was less than satisfied with the supplied stiffener plate and had to fab an additional plate myself. And it wasn't easy installing all this. But it IS dead reliable vs a mech linkage, I know having dealt with this in the 80's with a 67 big block Stang.
     

Share This Page