Why mod motors don't fit

Discussion in 'Technical' started by ATOMonkey, Sep 29, 2006.

  1. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,576
    Likes Received:
    2,928
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    he had 8 of them hanging on a rack to choose from.
    at a friends shop, that's what he does now...installs LS engines in 60s-70s model cars and trucks. he does about one a week. even did an early 2000 Porsche. he said they make a swap kit for about everything now.
     
    Static likes this.
  2. greasemonkey

    greasemonkey Burnin corn

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,406
    Likes Received:
    204
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Sedalia,MO
    Vehicle:
    1973 ford maverick Grabber,2017 dodge ram,88t-bird,indian scout,Indian Chieftain.95 Mustang GT
    The spark plug deal does suck. Iv pulled cabs myself but haven't had to in a long long time. The phasers are another problem but, since 2011 all the driveline improvements the new 5.0 is a very reliable engine. But,very complex and still very large. In all reality they have a ton of potential but no way would I try to wedge one in a Maverick.
     
  3. dan gregory

    dan gregory Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    835
    Likes Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    chesapeake va
    Vehicle:
    1970 maverick
    I had a 92 Lincoln w/ a 4.6,great mtr & never had a problem w/ it.However,Rob is right in that they are complex & the timing chain set up on them is also not really the best.That is why a 393 & a 408 are no brainers,easy to work on,make big torque which mod mtrs struggle to do,& they last a long time.They are very reliable,I know 2 racers that got 3 yrs each out of theirs,& these guys race a lot(3 times a mnth),& one of them has a 15 to 1 comp ratio with 3 in mains.Oh,& by the way at the Stick Shift Nationals A MIR he went 8.65 sec at 156mph in a fox.Right now,bar none,if you want a N/A platform,foxes with Windsors are kicking some serious but at the drag strip.I wanted to build one but now they are like Camaros,everybody has one so I am glad I got the Maverick just to be a little different.Right now my favorite Mav is Craig Hedjas with the Ozark Mountain Super Shifters,5.23 in the 1/8 w/ a Liberty & a 434 cleveland,that`s getting the job done!
     
    greasemonkey likes this.
  4. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,709
    Likes Received:
    2,429
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    I'd be looking at selling it for a profit to buy Windsor parts...

    Yes I've owned several 2v 4.6, other than the POS plastic intake busting on a Grand Marquis(in 49 years of vehicle ownership, it's one of the handful of repairs I paid someone else to do) and another needing valve stem seals (I repl those)they've been good... I wouldn't touch one for performance mainly because of the huge size and stupid $$$$ to get one to run decently... That said I did own a 2003 Marauder with a Eaton added from a '03 Stang Cobra... Nice car, no fun to work on...
    [​IMG]
     
  5. rotorr22

    rotorr22 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,302
    Likes Received:
    259
    Trophy Points:
    211
    Location:
    Columbiana, Ohio
    Vehicle:
    2018 F150 XLT/5.0, 2014 Focus 5 spd manual,1974 Maverick Grabber, 1986 Thunderbird Elan 5.0/AOD
    There are also economies of scale to consider. What percentage of the modulars on the road are 4 valves? One of the reasons the old 5.0 Windsor stuff took off in the aftermarket was the sheer number of them on the road. The aftermarket is out to make money and to do that in the hot rod market, the parts have to be value priced. That means keeping the unit cost low by means of volume. The 4V is also a pretty good factory engine, much in the same fashion as the 428CJ of old.

    Chevrolet held to its historical practice of creating a basic platform with the LS and sticking with it, which has created the production numbers that the aftermarket craves.
     
    mojo likes this.
  6. 351Blueblood

    351Blueblood Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2015
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Garage:
    1
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick
    Ummmm[​IMG][​IMG]
     
    mojo, greasemonkey and Krazy Comet like this.
  7. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,822
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    You're right, it is out of place. It should be under my hood... :bananaman:
     
  8. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    538
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
    It would be fun wouldn't it?:chirp:
     
  9. RMiller

    RMiller My name is Rick

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    538
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick Grabber
    Interesting read, they made a ton of power but certainly not on a budget I could sustain! I bet their investment would put a significant dent in my mortgage.
     
  10. 351Blueblood

    351Blueblood Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2015
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Garage:
    1
    Vehicle:
    1971 Maverick
    'We choose to go to the mod in this decade and do the other things. Not because they are easy, but because they are hard.
    '
     

Share This Page