coyote 5.0 swap

Discussion in 'Technical' started by Hottrod1991, Nov 15, 2014.

  1. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    I know theirs some guys working on some
    I take if you guys are retaining the factory ECU setup. and using the matching auto?
     
  2. Bryant

    Bryant forgot more than learned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,538
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    71 Maverick
    i have not done this yet. i was talking with someone who is doing this on an old t bird. they didnt know about he wiring portion. i took a look and the biggest problem is going the be the speed sensor. it looks like ford uses the wheel speed sensors for the transmission control. this means thats some sort of wheel speed sensor set up needs to be added to the car for the auto to work.
     
  3. mercgt73

    mercgt73 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    3,829
    Likes Received:
    354
    Trophy Points:
    223
    Location:
    Eastern Shore, Maryland
    Vehicle:
    1973 Comet GT (clone), 1974 Mustang II, 1980 Bobcat Wagon
  4. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    I guess the other lil snag may be the driveby wire throttle/pedal?
    Ill check out the other links now
     
  5. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    As for the vss and trans working, it says itll work with a mechanical speedo...so that should eliminate the vss issue
    .as should a gps speedo too..
    I wonder if theirs a y cheaper solutions..
    Too bad theirs not an off the shelve carb intake option
    I was looking at used coyote engines out of the trucks as you can get then for like 2200 shipped to door
     
  6. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    • What about a manual valve body for 4r70w
    Or simply use an AOD from a modular engine?
     
  7. Krazy Comet

    Krazy Comet Tom

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    7,692
    Likes Received:
    2,415
    Trophy Points:
    531
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Chesapeake VA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT clone 306 . 1969 Fairlane Cobra 428CJ 1988 T-Bird awaiting 331 ..
    No AOD ever had a modular pattern, the early 4.6 that used them had a small block bolt pattern cast on block... Yeah I know, another stupid move by Ford, why they switched and then had to build AODE/4R70W with two patterns makes even less sense...
     
  8. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    Well must not be hard though, read on some forums people running AODs, C4 and gm trans behind the coyote
    I Got to do more digging it seems
     
  9. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    Also i have been reading coyote and mod 4.6 share same bellhousing/ 8bolt crankshaft and flexplate bolt pattern..
     
  10. mav1970

    mav1970 Bob Hatcher

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    10,633
    Likes Received:
    322
    Trophy Points:
    398
    Location:
    Mountain Top Pa
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Maverick 393 Cleveland Stroker
    I love the "big motor - little car" concept. I'll be watching to see how the build goes :)
     
    Hottrod1991 likes this.
  11. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    yeah for an engine that weighs around 444lbs and puts out 360hp 380 ft lbs for 2k it doesn't seem like a bad route to go..a d it gets modernized
     
  12. mav1970

    mav1970 Bob Hatcher

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    10,633
    Likes Received:
    322
    Trophy Points:
    398
    Location:
    Mountain Top Pa
    Vehicle:
    69.5 Maverick 393 Cleveland Stroker
    My Cleveland certainly weighs more than that
     
  13. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    I did some digging and found a way to use a carb setup via 4.6 intake and custom spacers..but when said and done its essentially same cost with loss of the cvvt?

    I think a good lower cost alternative for transmission would be the use of a 4l80e with coan 4.6 to gm plate/converter and itll hold more power then link posted above
     
  14. safado

    safado Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2005
    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    West Phoenix, AZ
    is the truck motor the same as the mustang motor..internally?
     
  15. Hottrod1991

    Hottrod1991 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PGH,PA
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick
    Same forged crank
    Same exhaust cam
    Different intake cam
    .5 less compression ratio
    Different exhaust manifolds and intake manifold

    Havent looked into the boss 302 but know they have different intake then the other two...and different exhaust cam then the other two
     

Share This Page