Just curious.....

Discussion in 'Technical' started by PINKY, Jun 23, 2003.

  1. PINKY

    PINKY .....John Ford.....

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    9,875
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Louisville, Ky.
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick
    Will a C6 fit in a mav. without cutting the tranny tunnel?
     
  2. AdamMav

    AdamMav Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    Location:
    Marquette Michigan
    Vehicle:
    Black mav with 302
    I was going to put one in the mav last summer and after looking at the c4 and the c6 side by side.......... i decided, no i'd better not.
    I am almost positive there isnt enough room without cutting or hammering.
     
  3. wardf

    wardf Ward Frahler

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,964
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Location:
    Elizabethtown, Ky.
    Vehicle:
    70 maverick
    John, you don't want to go that way. WAY to heavy and power robbing. They are putting c-4s behind big blocks because of this very reason. With the parts they are making now for the c-4 there is no reason to go with the c-6 other than in something heavy or used to tow with.
     
  4. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    I agree with wardf. C6's are great for trucks that tow big loads...but for performance, go with the c4. They weigh about 100 lbs less than a prepped c6, and use about 50 less horsepower to turn it (on a good day!) I saw on another post that someone had stated that c4's arent that great above the 600 HP level....well, I know a guy that uses one that's built almost exactly like ours (except more, thinner clutches in forward and high drums) behind a nitrous 557 big block that has run some 8.30's in the 1/4. Built right, they are very tough. Not to mention they're fairly easy to build by yourself to hold up to respectable power levels.
     
  5. PINKY

    PINKY .....John Ford.....

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    9,875
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Louisville, Ky.
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick
    Thanks guys. I was just wondering, cause I kept hearing all these chevy boys telll me I needed to go with a c6, but I know that guys are running BIG numbers with the c4. Just needed some reassurrance. :)
     
  6. AdamMav

    AdamMav Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    Location:
    Marquette Michigan
    Vehicle:
    Black mav with 302
    Those damn chevy guys! always tellin us what to do.
     
  7. Lightning

    Lightning Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2002
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Saskatchewan ,Canada
    Vehicle:
    1971 comet GT
    Gonna have to call you on that one Mavman . It takes about 35 to 40 HP to run a C6 with five clutches in each pack and around 15 for a C4 , at least 6 or 7 years ago when I last looked into converting to a C4.
    C6 weigh 160 + pounds depending on which tailshaft housing and pan you have on it . C4s weigh just over a hundred pounds .


    I am curious ( anyone ) what the price of a prepared C4 would be that could handle around 400 -425 HP . Please don't tell me a stock one will as I know that is not true by experience .

    Specifically which stock parts do you have to buy after market to make it stand up . I always broke input shafts and/or forward clutch packs . Sometimes the back planetary cage cracked too . I have also seen alot of cases crack around the pump . No problems with convertors though .

    I am kinda interested now . I am thinking of getting a higher stall convertor and maybe it is time to look at changing to a C4 again .It seems a lot of people are having good luck with them . I liked the C6 because you could basically run a stock transmission , tear it down every 100 passes and have no trouble . Faster ETs are always better though .

    Any advice will be appreciated .
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2003
  8. CometGT1974

    CometGT1974 Gearhead

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,583
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    117
    Location:
    Western NC
    Vehicle:
    74 Comet GT
    The c4 will stand up to alot of abuse if built correctly and maintained properly!! Forget about a c6, they are just not the way to go when it comes to drag racing!! I searched around when building my c4 and found out that if you want it to last under MAJOR horsepower numbers you must be willing to spend some $$$$$. I bought a kit from Performance Automatic that included all new drums and performance clutches, hardened input shaft, 6-gear roller planetary, billet aluminum servo, deep pan, manual reverse valve body and several other little things!! This kit cost me about $800 if I remember correctly. I have since changed to a JPT billet t-brake valve body. I have had zero problems with my tranny since it was put together about 2 yrs ago. The tranny has been on several low 6 second passes in the 1/8th and has NEVER hesitated or anything!! In my opinion it was money well spent!! This tranny will last me a lifetime if I maintain it correctly, which means tearing it down at the end of the season and inspecting it and replacing what needs to be replaced. (clutches etc....)
     

Share This Page