playing with dyno2000

Discussion in 'Technical' started by Will, May 26, 2003.

  1. Will

    Will I

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    594
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Waco
    Vehicle:
    74 2door - Small bumpers, 5.0 EFI, Tremec 3550, disc brake 8.8,MII front end, boosted
    I put my setup in and found out I will have enough power for my virgin foot. :D

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Rick Book

    Rick Book Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,744
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    197
    Location:
    Thailand
    Vehicle:
    Missing my old '70 Maverick
    Wow - what stall converter do you have - looks like your power is up there in the rpms!

    Vroom Vroom! :thumbs up:
     
  3. Will

    Will I

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    594
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Waco
    Vehicle:
    74 2door - Small bumpers, 5.0 EFI, Tremec 3550, disc brake 8.8,MII front end, boosted
    its going to have a 5speed
     
  4. K. Merring

    K. Merring Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    484
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Easton,Pa.
    Vehicle:
    73 Comet GT
    Don't get over optimistic about that graph.
    Reasons; look at the peak torque, it's at 4500 rpm. You picked a set of parameters that included a long cam timing.
    If the car is for drag only, fine but for the street it would be much to aggressive unless you are going to run 4.10 gears and cruise at over 3000 rpm.
    I'm just trying to get you to see the technical/practical side of things and not just look at the numbers.
     
  5. MaverickGrabber

    MaverickGrabber MaverickGrabber1972

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    125
    Location:
    Cardington, ohio
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick Grabber 393w
    this is the info on mine how it is built



    [​IMG]
     
  6. K. Merring

    K. Merring Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    484
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Easton,Pa.
    Vehicle:
    73 Comet GT
    Yours is more in line with a 351 as expected but not for a 302.
    I am in the process of gathering engine parts for a 358 4 barrel alky engine using a sportsman block, N351 heads and a 800 cfm carb. The engine will be used in a sprint car turning as high as 7800 rpm and will still only make about 525 hp that's according to others who have built and real dynoed this combo.
    Point is you have to turn rpm to move air and make power from any engine.
    The dyno programs are nice to learn on but take about 15% off the figures because the program doesn't have enough parts spec-ed out to get really close for a $45 program. Takes one in the $300 range to get finely detailed expectation of what you will get for power.
     
  7. MaverickGrabber

    MaverickGrabber MaverickGrabber1972

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    125
    Location:
    Cardington, ohio
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick Grabber 393w
    ass long as its close

    [​IMG] :D
     
  8. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    I've found that desktop dyno is pretty close, at least in the case of our sprint. I ran the combo through, and it showed 838 HP, and on the engine dyno it dyno'd 854. 410 inch bowtie of course...but one of these days we're going to build a Ford. Wonder if Outlaws will allow canted-vavle heads??? I think 850 is possible with a 410w, don't you?
    might stay together longer than the chevys too:D
     
  9. MaverickGrabber

    MaverickGrabber MaverickGrabber1972

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    125
    Location:
    Cardington, ohio
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick Grabber 393w
    don't see why not :D
     
  10. CACollo

    CACollo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    417
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Abq. NM
    Vehicle:
    1969.5 Maverick
    That's actually about what my girlfriend's car came up with on a 5.0L mustang on desktop dyno2000. DD said 480 hp, ended up being 280 rwhp SAE. Not bad for a 302....
     

Share This Page