When did Ford change plug size?

Discussion in 'Other Automotive Tech & Talk' started by ford84stepside, Dec 29, 2011.

  1. ford84stepside

    ford84stepside Lone Wolf

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,038
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    132
    Location:
    Berry Alabama
    Vehicle:
    1947 Lincoln Zephyr Coupe
    When did the spark plug size go from the large 13/16 plugs to the smaller 5/8 ones? My other 302 has the large plugs, so I'm thinking they're probably 289 heads. The motor is on the stand, upside down, covered up in my storage room and I can't get to it to check numbers on the heads and block. IIRC, I ran the numbers on the block once before and it was a 70 block, but I'm not sure now. It has a three bolt 28oz balancer, so it might end up being a 289 instead of a 302. Doesn't really matter one way or the other which size it is, as it's going to be a cruiser in the street rod anyways. Just wondering mostly about the heads, if they are the small chambers or not and if the big plugs will give problems with header fitment.
     
  2. tim keck

    tim keck truckdrivintrailertrash

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    sharps chapel,Tn
    Vehicle:
    '72 Comet, '75 Maverick, '85 F150 4x4 ,'93 F150,'75 F100,'77 Jeep Wagoneer,'91 Dodge D250 Cummins,'90 F150 xtra cab 4x4, '93 F150 4x4
    I think '74 or '75. My '75 had the smaller plugs, put on some '72 heads & they were the big plugs. My '73 had the big plugs too.
     
  3. Joe Dirt

    Joe Dirt BBF life

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    4,375
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Cleveland, TN
    Vehicle:
    1970 ford torino #1
    1974 was the first year for. The 5/8 hex plug
     
  4. strokermaverick

    strokermaverick Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    100
    Location:
    CAPE CARTERET,N.C. (COASTAL BEACH AREA)
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick 2 door/ 420 c.i. stroker, converted to small bumpers ('73 Maverick 2 door 302 a/c p/s c-4 SOLD) '69.5 Maverick 2 door 200 c.i. c-4
    Just remember, none of these heads flowed well. It does'nt matter which set of stock heads you run. If they were not the DOOE heads, none of them flowed better.
    It doesn't matter if the combustion chambers were smaller. The DOOE heads, off the 351W 4V, were the only heads that flowed margionally better than any of the other heads.
    No matter if they were the 289 power pack heads, or what they were.

    The only small block head, besides the tunnel port 302, that flowed any better, was the DOOE heads, that came off the 351W 4V engines. The old 289 power pack heads off the Shelby, even flowed less than the 351W 4V heads. Yet, they worked good on the little 289.
    I venture to say, that a set of gasket matched, 302 heads will flow more than those 289 power pack heads.
    The 289 power pack heads had very small intake runners and exhaust port volume.:tiphat:
     
  5. ford84stepside

    ford84stepside Lone Wolf

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,038
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    132
    Location:
    Berry Alabama
    Vehicle:
    1947 Lincoln Zephyr Coupe
    ^ Reread original post. Not looking for flow or HP on this motor, it's a street cruiser only. Just curious about the plugs, and possibly the chamber size for the compression ratio. Don't want a cruiser that I have to feed race gas!:D
     
  6. rthomas771

    rthomas771 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,055
    Likes Received:
    950
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    GA
    Vehicle:
    '74 Maverick 302 5-Speed.'60 Falcon V8. '63.5 Falcon HT
    Ford went to 4 bolt balancer in 1970. Most 289's had a thin harmonic balancer. The 1968-69 small blocks had a wider balancer with more detailed timing markings.
     

Share This Page