![]() |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#32 |
|
Adam
|
Not the best idea to mix and match parts.
A-arm mounting points are positioned and a-arm length is chosen to minimize bump steer in a particular application. If you put a random rack with a random crossmember and random control arms, it probably won't drive so well. By changing the length of th arms and where they're mounted (up and down in the car) will also really affect handling. This geometry determines the instant center of the suspension, which works with the center of gravity to determine how much body roll you get when going around corners, and how the tire is positioned with respect to the road. If you just need the front end to hold the engine off the ground, then anything will probably work.
__________________
1969.5 2 Dr - 4.6 T56 IRS conversion WIP Modular Maverick Mafia - Member #3 http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2200206 |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Novice
Join Date: 2011-12-03
Location: Drummonds Tenn
Posts: 6
Vehicle(s): 1964 Falcon sprint a964 comet calienteiTrader: 0 (0%)
|
Mustang 11 front end install
Hello,I'll do what I can to help in this area, I have done this swap 4 times total now,Three of them were done using donor front ends I have bought out of 1977-1978 mustang salvage cars and one from a kit from spartan rod works wich worked good also. Spartan rod works has a web site and are based in Sparta Wisconsin. Their kits require a bit more welding and assembly but the prices are quite a bit cheaper than some others I have seen. When you use an original mustang 11 front end and graft it in you do have to incorporate the original strut rods to the m11 front end but its not that hard to do
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Bob Hatcher
|
Here is a Facebook link for one of our newest forum members that designed and built his own Mustang II type front suspension for his Maverick - Really great build photos in his album
![]() https://www.facebook.com/jeffrey.sasse
__________________
Every step of my project has been temporarily impossible My Insane 1969.5 Street Project Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Senior member
|
What I wonder is if the spindles are the same.. I recently purchased a 72 that has a Street Rod Enginering crossmember in it. It has nothing else for a suspension or steering. I can get all the componants to complete the front end back together from them.
When it comes to the brakes I am considering upgrading from the Granada setup they offer to Wilwood. They say that I have to have their brackets and I need to know which calipers I want.. SO.. I wonder if I can get the brackets directly from Wilwood or from say a member who might be intrested in selling their parts. Not that there is a member at this time, just wondering if it were possible if I decided to go that route.. Reading the information in this thread reminds me that I was wanting to look and compare the differences in the Street Rod structure and the R&C structure. I already have the one crossmember in my 72 and need to do a kit to my 73. From what I read so far I should not get my A arms from R&C to put on my 72. But I wonder if anything else would matter..
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Bob Hatcher
|
Quote:
__________________
Every step of my project has been temporarily impossible My Insane 1969.5 Street Project Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Senior member
|
Sounds like what I understand so far... Once I get the car here (which is being picked up as I type this) I want to compare the attaching point on the crossmember for the lower A arms to the R&C. I am thinking this area is a critical one. My thoughts are wider and thicker tube/sleeve is better and gussetted is a plus.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Bob Hatcher
|
Quote:
And gussets are always a good addition
__________________
Every step of my project has been temporarily impossible My Insane 1969.5 Street Project Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Interested in this thread? Receive email updates and post your own response by registering today, it's free! |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|