302 or 347???

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by Mikef, Jun 17, 2022.

  1. ike72com

    ike72com Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2019
    Messages:
    408
    Likes Received:
    247
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Charleston SC
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet, 70 mustang, F250 and F100
    Read replys to your post Mikef. A Lil research a good idea too.

    347 is a stroked 302 as Rmiller stated.
    408 is a stroked 351w
     
    mojo likes this.
  2. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,538
    Likes Received:
    2,907
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    it bolts into the same place as the 302.
    headers, intake and fuel system are the biggest external mods. sometimes the valve covers are depending on what roller rockers you want to run.
    with these mods sometimes it require a hood change.
    you can build it from mild to wild.
    mine was built to a 9:1 compression specs. for reg. pump gas. builder said a cam change and peel some off the head gaskets and mine would pick up another 50 HP. I was building mine for the street.
    this is a pic of it when I picked it up from the builder...Coupe Performance.
    my Wife and I did an 11 day, 3,300 mile trip one July vacation...:drive:...:chirp:
     

    Attached Files:

    Shorty likes this.
  3. bmcdaniel

    bmcdaniel Senile Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,800
    Likes Received:
    673
    Trophy Points:
    318
    Location:
    York. PA
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick Grabber
    Like others have said, it's a 302 block, just bored and stroked internally, so it bolts right into your car like a 302. To get the full potential you should use headers. Think of it more as a 351 than a 302.
     
  4. Mikef

    Mikef Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2022
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    2
    Location:
    Inland Empire, Southern California
    Vehicle:
    1971 Ford Maverick
    yes. That was a dumb question. I brain farted.
     
  5. greasemonkey

    greasemonkey Burnin corn

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,401
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Sedalia,MO
    Vehicle:
    1973 ford maverick Grabber,2017 dodge ram,88t-bird,indian scout,Indian Chieftain.95 Mustang GT
    It just takes some different parts to support it and get the benefits of the extra cubic inches.
     
  6. satchelmcqueen

    satchelmcqueen Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Location:
    north georgia
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick
    this is what i plan on in the next 2yrs if possible. got a good raise so itll be sooner if this economy ever recovers unfortunately.
     
  7. CaptainComet

    CaptainComet Large Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    4,992
    Likes Received:
    436
    Trophy Points:
    413
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    You'll be happier with the way a 302 based stroker (331 is what I keep leaning toward, there is some thought they rev better). Your selection of headers is greater than if you go to the larger 351W based motor and it will just fit better overall.

    I currently have a 351W in my Comet and will likely switch back to a 302-based motor when the time comes. My headers are ridiculously tight fitting and probably no big benefit. When I did the swap in the mid-90s, there were not as many stroker kits out there like now.
     
    TeeEl likes this.
  8. Jaybee

    Jaybee Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2019
    Messages:
    460
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    117
    Location:
    Hampton Roads, VA
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick
    I can't imagine you being sorry you went with a 347 over a 302.
     
  9. pjb03

    pjb03 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2018
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Location:
    St. Augustine, Fl
    Vehicle:
    72 Maverick Grabber
    That is a combo I'm interested in. An 87 octane 302 that gets 20+ with a T5 or AOD.
     
  10. Lee Richart

    Lee Richart Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Redford, MI
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick LDO 421W
    I built my car as a sleeper and is stock on the outside. I love my 421 (stroked 351W) and have had it in my car for 15 years. It peaks out about 5200rpms, but the midrange torque is brutal. It is a C4 and finally had to rebuild it last year. It has a 2800 stall converter and is just getting into the torque curve at that rpms. It has a 3.50 tractionlok and a gearvendors OD so it cruises down the hiway @70 the rpms are about 2300. There is no substitute for cubic inches.
    Lee "THE MAV" Richart
     
  11. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,538
    Likes Received:
    2,907
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber
    Hi Lee, been a while.
    glad to see that gearvendors OD is still doing you good. how long have you had it now?
    Frank
     

Share This Page